Abstract
Cross-region innovation is widely recognized as an important source of the long-term regional innovation capacity. In the recent past, a growing number of studies has investigated the network structure and mechanisms of cross-region innovation collaboration in various contexts. However, existing research mainly focuses on physical effects, such as geographical distance and high-speed railway connections. These studies ignore the intangible drivers in a changing environment, the more digitalized economy and the increasingly solidified innovation network structure. Thus, the focus of this study is on estimating determinants of innovation networks, especially on intangible drivers, which have been largely neglected so far. Using city-level data of Chinese patents (excluding Hong Kong, Macao, and Taiwan Province of China), we trace innovation networks across Chinese cities over a long period of time. By integrating a measure on Information and Communications Technology (ICT) development gap and network structural effects into the general proximity framework, this paper explores the changing mechanisms of Chinese innovation networks from a new perspective. The results show that the structure of cross-region innovation networks has changed in China. As mechanisms behind this development, the results confirm the increasingly important role of intangible drivers in Chinese inter-city innovation collaboration when controlling for effects of physical proximity, such as geographical distance. Since digitalization and coordinated development are the mainstream trends in China and other developing countries, these countries’ inter-city innovation collaboration patterns will witness dramatic changes under the influence of intangible drivers.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abdi H, Williams L J, 2010. Principal component analysis. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews:Computational Statistics, 2(4): 433–459. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/wics.101
Acs Z J, Anselin L, Varga A, 2002. Patents and innovation counts as measures of regional production of new knowledge. Research Policy, 31(7): 1069–1085. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00184-6
Antonelli C, Geuna A, Steinmueller W E, 2000. Information and communication technologies and the production, distribution and use of knowledge. International Journal of Technology Management, 20(1–2): 72–94. doi: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.2000.002853
Aslesen H W, Martin R, Sardo S, 2019. The virtual is reality! On physical and virtual space in software firms’ knowledge formation. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 31(9–10): 669–682. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2018.1552314
Balland P A, De Vaan M, Boschma R, 2013. The dynamics of interfirm networks along the industry life cycle: the case of the global video game industry, 1987–2007. Journal of Economic Geography, 13(5): 741–765. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbs023
Barabási A L, Albert R, 1999. Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science, 286(5439): 509–512. doi: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.286.5439.509
Bergé L R, 2017. Network proximity in the geography of research collaboration. Papers in Regional Science, 96(4): 785–815. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/pirs.12218
Boschma R, 2005. Proximity and innovation: a critical assessment. Regional Studies, 39(1): 61–74. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/0034340052000320887
Breschi S, Lenzi C, 2016. Co-invention networks and inventive productivity in US cities. Journal of Urban Economics, 92: 66–75. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2015.12.003
Broekel T, 2012. Collaboration intensity and regional innovation efficiency in Germany: a conditional efficiency approach. Industry and Innovation, 19(2): 155–179. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2012.650884
Cameron A C, Trivedi P K, 1998. Models for Count Data. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dang J W, Motohashi K, 2015. Patent statistics: a good indicator for innovation in China? Patent subsidy program impacts on patent quality. China Economic Review, 35: 137–155. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2015.03.012
De Noni I, Ganzaroli A, Orsi L, 2017. The impact of intra- and inter-regional knowledge collaboration and technological variety on the knowledge productivity of European regions. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 117: 108–118. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.01.003
Démurger S, Fournier M, 2011. Poverty and firewood consumption: a case study of rural households in northern China. China Economic Review, 22(4): 512–523. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2010.09.009
Dodgson M, 1993. Learning, trust, and technological collaboration. Human Relations, 46(1): 77–95. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/001872679304600106
Dong X F, Zheng S Q, Kahn M E, 2020. The role of transportation speed in facilitating high skilled teamwork across cities. Journal of Urban Economics, 115: 103212. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2019.103212
Dong Z J, Xu L, Cheng J H et al., 2021. Major factors affecting biomedical cross-city R&D collaborations based on cooperative patents in China. Scientometrics, 126(3): 1923–1943. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03828-4
Fritsch M, Kudic M, 2016. Preferential Attachment and Pattern Formation in R&D Networks-plausible Explanation or Just a Widespread Myth? Jena: Friedrich Schiller University Jena.
Gassmann O, 2006. Opening up the innovation process: towards an agenda. R& D Management, 36(3): 223–228. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2006.00437.X
Glückler J, 2007. Economic geography and the evolution of networks. Journal of Economic Geography, 7(5): 619–634. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbm023
Grabher G, Ibert O, 2014. Distance as asset? Knowledge collaboration in hybrid virtual communities. Journal of Economic Geography, 14(1): 97–123. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbt014
Granstrand O, Patel P, Pavitt K, 1997. Multi-technology corporations: why they have ‘distributed’ rather than ‘distinctive core’ competencies. California Management Review, 39(4): 8–25. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/41165908
Grillitsch M, Nilsson M, 2015. Innovation in peripheral regions: do collaborations compensate for a lack of local knowledge spillovers? The Annals of Regional Science, 54(1): 299–321. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-014-0655-8
Gu Q, Lu X H, 2014. Unraveling the mechanisms of reputation and alliance formation: a study of venture capital syndication in China. Strategic Management Journal, 35(5): 739–750. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2117
Hancock J T, Dunham P J, 2001. Impression formation in computer-mediated communication revisited: an analysis of the breadth and intensity of impressions. Communication Research, 28(3): 325–347. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/009365001028003004
Hanley D, Li J C, Wu M Q, 2022. High-speed railways and collaborative innovation. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 93: 103717. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2021.103717
He Yubing, 2012. The theoretical model of I-U-R collaborative innovation. Studies in Science of Science, 30(2): 165–184. (in Chinese)
Hoekman J, Frenken K, Tijssen R J W, 2010. Research collaboration at a distance: changing spatial patterns of scientific collaboration within Europe. Research Policy, 39(5): 662–673. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.012
Hu Yang, Li Xun, 2017. The impact of multi-dimensional proximities on university-industry cooperative innovation: case studies of high-tech enterprises in Guangzhou. Geographical Research, 36(4): 695–706. (in Chinese)
Jiang S Q, Shi A N, Peng Z H et al., 2017. Major factors affecting cross-city R&D collaborations in China: evidence from cross-sectional co-patent data between 224 cities. Scientometrics, 111(3): 1251–1266. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2358-2
Li D D, Wei Y D, Wang T, 2015. Spatial and temporal evolution of urban innovation network in China. Habitat International, 49: 484–496. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2015.05.031
Liu Y Q, Shao X Y, Tang M P et al., 2021. Spatio-temporal evolution of green innovation network and its multidimensional proximity analysis: Empirical evidence from China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 283: 124649. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124649
Long J S, Freese J, 2006. Regression Models for Categorical Dependent Variables Using Stata. 2nd ed. New York: Stata Press.
Lu Lachang, Huang Ru, 2012. Urban hierarchy of innovation capability and inter-city linkages of knowledge in post-reform China. Chinese Geographical Science, 22(5): 602–616. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11769-012-0555-8
Lyytinen K, Yoo Y, Boland Jr R J, 2016. Digital product innovation within four classes of innovation networks. Information Systems Journal, 26(1): 47–75. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12093
Ma H T, Fang C L, Pang B et al., 2014. The effect of geographical proximity on scientific cooperation among Chinese cities from 1990 to 2010. PloS One, 9(11): e111705. doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0111705
Ma Haitao, Fang Chuanglin, Pang Bo et al., 2015. Structure of Chinese city network as driven by technological knowledge flows. Chinese Geographical Science, 25(4): 498–510. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11769-014-0731-0
Maggioni M A, Nosvelli M, Uberti T E, 2007. Space versus networks in the geography of innovation: a European analysis. Papers in Regional Science, 86(3): 471–493. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1435-5957.2007.00130.x
Malecki E J, 2017. Real people, virtual places, and the spaces in between. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 58: 3–12. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2016.10.008
Marek P, Titze M, Fuhrmeister C et al., 2017. R&D collaborations and the role of proximity. Regional Studies, 51(12): 1761–1773. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2016.1242718
Marion T J, Fixson S K, 2021. The transformation of the innovation process: how digital tools are changing work, collaboration, and organizations in new product development. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 38(1): 192–215. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12547
Montobbio F, Sterzi V, 2013. The globalization of technology in emerging markets: a gravity model on the determinants of international patent collaborations. World Development, 44: 281–299. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2012.11.017
Morrison A, Rabellotti R, Zirulia L, 2013. When do global pipelines enhance the diffusion of knowledge in clusters? Economic Geography, 89(1): 77–96. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-8287.2012.01167.x
Neuländtner M, Scherngell T, 2020. Geographical or relational: what drives technology-specific R&D collaboration networks? The Annals of Regional Science, 65(3): 743–773. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-020-01002-5
Newman M E J, 2001. Clustering and preferential attachment in growing networks. Physical Review E, 64(2): 025102. doi: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.64.025102
Pan X F, Pan X Y, Ai B W et al., 2020. Structural heterogeneity and proximity mechanism of China’s inter-regional innovation cooperation network. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 32(9): 1066–1081. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2020.1740193
Rodríguez-Crespo E, Martínez-Zarzoso I, 2019. The effect of ICT on trade: does product complexity matter? Telematics and Informatics, 41: 182–196. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2019.05.001
Rossmannek O, Rank O N, 2021. Is it really a universal phenomenon? Preferential attachment in alliance networks. European Management Review, 18(l): 85–89. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/emre.12428
Scherngell T, Barber M J, 2009. Spatial interaction modelling of cross - region R&D collaborations: empirical evidence from the 5th EU framework programme. Papers in Regional Science, 88(3): 531–546. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1435-5957.2008.00215.x
Scherngell T, Hu Y J, 2011. Collaborative knowledge production in China: regional evidence from a gravity model approach. Regional Studies, 45(6): 755–772. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00343401003713373
Scherngell T, Lata R, 2013. Towards an integrated European Research Area? Findings from Eigenvector spatially filtered spatial interaction models using European Framework Programme data. Papers in Regional Science, 92(3): 555–577. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1435-5957.2012.00419.x
Scherngell T, 2021. The geography of R&D collaboration networks. In: Fischer M M, Nijkamp P (eds). Handbook of Regional Science. Berlin: Springer, 869–887.
Shen Kunrong, Lin Jianwei, Fu Yuanhai, 2023. Network infrastructure construction, information accessibility and the innovation boundaries of enterprises. China Industrial Economics, (1): 57–75. (in Chinese)
Singh R K, Murty H R, Gupta S K et al., 2009. An overview of sustainability assessment methodologies. Ecological Indicators, 9(2): 189–212. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2008.05.011
Song Z Y, Wang C, Bergmann L, 2020. China’s prefectural digital divide: spatial analysis and multivariate determinants of ICT diffusion. International Journal of Information Management, 52: 102072. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102072
Sun Y T, Cao C, 2015. Intra- and inter-regional research collaboration across organizational boundaries: evolving patterns in China. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 96: 215–231. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2015.03.013
Sun Y T, Liu K, 2016. Proximity effect, preferential attachment and path dependence in inter-regional network: a case of China’s technology transaction. Scientometrics, 108(1): 201–220. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-1951-0
Sun Y T, 2016. The structure and dynamics of intra- and inter-regional research collaborative networks: the case of China (1985–2008). Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 108: 70–82. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.04.017
Ter Wal A L J, Boschma R A, 2009. Applying social network analysis in economic geography: framing some key analytic issues. The Annals of Regional Science, 43(3): 739–756. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-008-0258-3
Tewathia N, Kamath A, Ilavarasan P V, 2020. Social inequalities, fundamental inequities, and recurring of the digital divide: insights from India. Technology in Society, 61: 101251. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101251
Torre A, 2011. The role of proximity during long-distance collaborative projects. Temporary geographical proximity helps. International Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy, 7(1–3): 213–230. doi: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJFIP.2011.040075
Wang D, Zhou T, Lan F et al., 2021. ICT and socio-economic development: evidence from a spatial panel data analysis in China. Telecommunications Policy, 45(7): 102173. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2021.102173
Wang M L, Choi C H, 2019. How information and communication technology affect international trade: a comparative analysis of BRICS countries. Information Technology for Development, 25(3): 455–474. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2018.1493675
Wang Yue, Wang Chengyun, MAO Xiyan et al., 2021. Spatial pattern and benefit allocation in regional collaborative innovation of the Yangtze River Delta, China. Chinese Geographical Science, 31(5): 900–914. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11769-021-1224-6
Wasserman S, Faust K, 1994. Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wold S, Esbensen K, Geladi P, 1987. Principal component analysis. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 2(1–3): 37–52. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-7439(87)80084-9
Xie Q J, Su J, 2021. The spatial-temporal complexity and dynamics of research collaboration: evidence from 297 cities in China (1985–2016). Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 162: 120390. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120390
Yao L, Li J, 2022. Intercity innovation collaboration and the role of high-speed rail connections: evidence from Chinese co-patent data. Regional Studies, 56(11): 1845–1857. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2021.2008340
Zhang C W, Bu Y, Ding Y et al., 2018. Understanding scientific collaboration: homophily, transitivity, and preferential attachment. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 69(1): 72–86. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23916
Zhao M Y, Isalam M, 2017. Cross-Regional R&D Collaboration and Local Knowledge Spillover. Bingley: Emerald Publishing, 343–385.
Funding
Open access funding provided by AIT Austrian Institute of Technology GmbH.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed to the study conceptualization and design. Gao Yujie: conceptualization, data collection and analysis, methodology, writing-original draft; Thomas Scherngell: conceptualization, writing-review and editing, supervision; Martina Neuländtner: conceptualization, writing-review and editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
The authors have no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.
Additional information
Foundation item: Under the auspices of China Scholarship Council
Supplementary
Tables S1–S3 and Fig. S1 could be found at http://egeoscien.neigae.ac.cn/indexcn.htm
Electronic Supplementary Material
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Gao, Y., Scherngell, T. & Neuländtner, M. Drivers for Inter-city Innovation Networks Across Chinese Cities: Modelling Physical Versus Intangible Effects. Chin. Geogr. Sci. (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11769-024-1426-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11769-024-1426-9