You are here

Article Text

Article menu
Download PDFPDF
Commentary
Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists to treat chronic liver disease: real-world evidence or ambiguity?
  1. Samy Suissa1,2,
  2. Ruben Hernaez3,4
  1. 1 Centre for Clinical Epidemiology, Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
  2. 2 Departments of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, and of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
  3. 3 Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
  4. 4 Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Michael E DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, Texas, USA
  1. Correspondence to Dr Samy Suissa, Centre for Clinical Epidemiology, Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Montreal, Canada; samy.suissa{at}mcgill.ca

https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2024-331976

Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

    Chronic liver diseases are prevalent, particularly among patients with type 2 diabetes, who have a higher incidence of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) and are subject to other liver diseases.1 With no pharmacotherapy for these liver conditions, recent attention was given to glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP1a) for their effectiveness in treating type 2 diabetes and obesity and in reducing liver enzyme levels and liver fat levels.2 A 72-week, phase II, placebo-controlled randomised trial in patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and liver fibrosis found that the GLP1a semaglutide improves the resolution of NASH but does not affect fibrosis regression.2 By its limited size, however, this trial could not provide effectiveness data on major liver outcomes (MALO), such as decompensated cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma, liver transplantation or liver-related death, despite its long-term follow-up. Non-randomised observational studies can be useful to address such questions.

    In Gut, Wester et al 3 present an observational study that evaluates the effectiveness of GLP1a in the long-term incidence of MALO in patients with chronic liver disease and type 2 diabetes. They use data from Swedish healthcare registers between 2010 and 2020 to identify all Swedish adult residents with diagnoses of chronic liver disease and type 2 diabetes and who filled at least one prescription of metformin, an indication for second-line treatment with a GLP1a (liraglutide, semaglutide, dulaglutide, exenatide and lixisenatide).

    Within this base cohort, defined as of January 2010, initiation and continuation of a GLP1a were compared with non-initiation. The outcome was the first MALO event to occur during follow-up, namely decompensated cirrhosis (variceal bleeding, ascites, portal hypertension or hepatorenal syndrome), hepatocellular carcinoma, need for liver transplantation or MALO-related death. The authors emulated a hypothetical pragmatic randomised controlled trial (RCT), a so-called ‘target trial’, by generating a series of 131 separate ‘trials’, …

    View Full Text

    Footnotes

    • Contributors SS and RH contributed equally to writing the commentary.

    • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

    • Competing interests SS attended scientific advisory committee meetings or received speaking fees from AstraZeneca, Atara, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck, Novartis, Panalgo, Pfizer and Seqirus. RH is an Editorial Board Member for Gut journal.

    • Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.

    Linked Articles