skip to main content
research-article

DHyper: A Recurrent Dual Hypergraph Neural Network for Event Prediction in Temporal Knowledge Graphs

Published:29 April 2024Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Event prediction is a vital and challenging task in temporal knowledge graphs (TKGs), which have played crucial roles in various applications. Recently, many graph neural networks based approaches are proposed to model the graph structure information in TKGs. However, these approaches only construct graphs based on quadruplets and model the pairwise correlation between entities, which fail to capture the high-order correlations among entities. To this end, we propose DHyper, a recurrent Dual Hypergraph neural network for event prediction in TKGs, which simultaneously models the influences of the high-order correlations among both entities and relations. Specifically, a dual hypergraph learning module is proposed to discover the high-order correlations among entities and among relations in a parameterized way. A dual hypergraph message passing network is introduced to perform the information aggregation and representation fusion on the entity hypergraph and the relation hypergraph. Extensive experiments on six real-world datasets demonstrate that DHyper achieves the state-of-the-art performances, outperforming the best baseline by an average of 13.09%, 4.26%, 17.60%, and 18.03% in MRR, Hits@1, Hits@3, and Hits@10, respectively.

REFERENCES

  1. [1] Zhao Yuyue, Wang Xiang, Chen Jiawei, Wang Yashen, Tang Wei, He Xiangnan, and Xie Haiyong. 2022. Time-aware path reasoning on knowledge graph for recommendation. ACM Transactions on Information Systems 41, 2 (2022), 126.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. [2] Li Yakun, Hou Lei, and Li Juanzi. 2023. Preference-aware graph attention networks for cross-domain recommendations with collaborative knowledge graph. ACM Transactions on Information Systems 41, 3 (2023), 126.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. [3] Chen Ling, Tang Xing, Qian Yuntao, Li Yansheng, and Zhang Yongjun. 2022. DACHA: A dual graph convolution based temporal knowledge graph representation learning method using historical relation. ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data 16, 3 (2022), 118.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. [4] Dasgupta Shib Sankar, Ray Swayambhu Nath, and Talukdar Partha. 2018. HyTE: Hyperplane-based temporally aware knowledge graph embedding. In EMNLP 2001–2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. [5] Deldjoo Yashar, Schedl Markus, Cremonesi Paolo, and Pasi Gabriella. 2020. Recommender systems leveraging multimedia content. ACM Computing Surveys 53, 5 (2020), 138.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. [6] Deng Songgaojun, Huzefa Rangwala, and Yue Ning. 2020. Dynamic knowledge graph based multi-event forecasting. In KDD. 15851595.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. [7] Fang Jingzhi, Shen Yanyan, Wang Yue, and Chen Lei. 2020. Optimizing DNN computation graph using graph substitutions. In VLDB, 13, 12 (2020), 27342746.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. [8] Feng Yifan, You Haoxuan, Zhang Zizhao, Ji Rongrong, and Gao Yue. 2019. Hypergraph neural networks. In AAAI, 35583565.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. [9] Gao Yue, Feng Yifan, Ji Shuyi, and Ji Rongrong. 2022. HGNN+: General hypergraph neural networks. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 45, 3 (2022), 31813199.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. [10] Jin Woojeong, Qu Meng, Jin Xisen, and Ren Xiang. 2020. Recurrent event network: Autoregressive structure inference over temporal knowledge graphs. In EMNLP. 66696683.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. [11] Kingma Diederik P. and Ba Jimmy. 2015. Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. In ICLR. 115.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. [12] Leblay Julien and Chekol Melisachew Wudage. 2018. Deriving validity time in knowledge graph. In WWW. 17711776.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. [13] Kalev Leetaru and Philip A. Schrodt . 2013. GDELT: Global data on events, location, and tone, 1979–2012. ISA Annual Convention 2, 4 (2013), 149.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. [14] Li Zixuan, Jin Xiaolong, Li Wei, Guan Saiping, Guo Jiafeng, Shen Huawei, Wang Yuanzhuo, and Cheng Xueqi. 2021. Temporal knowledge graph reasoning based on evolutional representation learning. In SIGIR. 408417.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. [15] Li Yujia, Sun Shiliang, and Zhao Jing. 2022. TiRGN: Time-guided recurrent graph network with local-global historical patterns for temporal knowledge graph reasoning. In IJCAI. 21522158.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. [16] Liu Kangzheng, Zhao Feng, Chen Hongxu, Li Yicong, Xu Guandong, and Jin Hai. 2022. DA-Net: Distributed attention network for temporal knowledge graph reasoning. In CIKM. 12891298.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. [17] Pham Minh Tam, Hoang Thanh Dat, Nguyen Minh Hieu, Vu Viet Hung, Huynh Thanh Trung, and Huynh Quyet Thang. 2022. Social multi-role discovering with hypergraph embedding for location-based social networks. In ACIIDS. 675687.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. [18] Schlichtkrull Michael, Kipf Thomas N., Bloem Peter, Berg Rianne Van Den, Titov Ivan, and Welling Max. 2018. Modeling relational data with graph convolutional networks. In ESWC. 593607.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. [19] Sun Haohai, Zhong Jialun, Ma Yunpu, Han Zhen, and He Kun. 2021. TimeTraveler: Reinforcement learning for temporal knowledge graph forecasting. In EMNLP. 83068319.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. [20] Tang Xing, Chen Ling, Cui Jun, and Wei Baogang. 2019. Knowledge representation learning with entity descriptions, hierarchical types, and textual relations. Information Processing and Management 56, 3 (2019), 809822.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. [21] Xing Tang and Ling Chen. 2023. GTRL: An entity group-aware temporal knowledge graph representation learning method. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 99 (2023), 1--16. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. [22] Trivedi Rakshit, Dai Hanjun, Wang Yichen, and Song Le. 2017. Know-Evolve: Deep temporal reasoning for dynamic knowledge graphs. In ICML. 34623471.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. [23] Maaten Laurens Van der and Hinton Geoffrey. 2008. Visualizing data using t-SNE. Journal of Machine Learning Research 9, 11 (2008), 25792605.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. [24] Vashishth Shikhar, Sanyal Soumya, Vikram Nitin , and Partha Talukdar . 2020. Composition-based multi-relational graph convolutional networks. In ICLR, 116.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. [25] Wang Jianling, Ding Kaize, Hong Liangjie, Liu Huan, and Caverlee James. 2020. Next-item recommendation with sequential hypergraphs. In SIGIR. 11011110.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. [26] Wu Jiapeng, Cao Meng, Cheung Jackie Chi Kit, and Hamilton William L.. 2020. TeMP: Temporal message passing for temporal knowledge graph completion. In EMNLP. 57305746.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. [27] Xia Lianghao, Huang Chao, Xu Yong, Zhao Jiashu, Yin Dawei, and Huang Jimmy. 2022. Hypergraph contrastive collaborative filtering. In SIGIR. 7079.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. [28] Yang Dingqi, Qu Bingqing, Yang Jie, and Cudré-Mauroux Philippe. 2020. LBSN2Vec++: Heterogeneous hypergraph embedding for location-based social networks. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 34, 4 (2020), 18431855.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. [29] Yang Yuhao, Huang Chao, Xia Lianghao, Liang Yuxuan, Yu Yanwei, and Li Chenliang. 2022. Multi-behavior hypergraph-enhanced transformer for sequential recommendation. In KDD. 22632274.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. [30] Yi Jaehyuk and Park Jinkyoo. 2020. Hypergraph convolutional recurrent neural network. In KDD. 3366–-3376.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. [31] Yin Nan, Feng Fuli, Luo Zhigang, Zhang Xiang, Wang Wenjie, Luo Xiao, Chen Chong, and Hua Xian-Sheng. 2022. Dynamic hypergraph convolutional network. In ICDE. 16211634.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. [32] Ying Zhitao, You Jiaxuan, Morris Christopher, Ren Xiang, Hamilton Will, and Leskovec Jure. 2018. Hierarchical graph representation learning with differentiable pooling. In NIPS. 48014811.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. [33] Degterev Denis, Badrutdinova Kristina, and Stepanova Anna. 2017. Interconnections among the United States, Russia and China: Does Kissinger's American leadership formula apply? International Organizations Research Journal 12, 1 (2017), 81109.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. [34] Zhang Jiasheng, Liang Shuang, Sheng Yongpan, and Shao Jie. 2022. Temporal knowledge graph representation learning with local and global evolutions. Knowledge-Based Systems 251, 9 (2022), 113.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. [35] Zhang Jiying, Chen Yuzhao, Xiao Xi, Lu Runiu, and Xia Shu-Tao. 2022. Learnable hypergraph Laplacian for hypergraph learning. In ICASSP. 45034507.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. [36] Zhang Zhen, Bu Jiajun, Ester Martin, Zhang Jianfeng, Li Zhao, Yao Chengwei, Dai Huifen, Yu Zhi, and Wang Can. 2021. Hierarchical multi-view graph pooling with structure learning. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 35, 1 (2021), 545559.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. [37] Martins Andre and Astudillo Ramon. 2016. From softmax to sparsemax: A sparse model of attention and multi-label classification. In ICML. 16141623.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. [38] Bergstra James, Komer Brent, Eliasmith Chris, Yamins Dan, and Cox David D.. 2015. Hyperopt: A python library for model selection and hyperparameter optimization. Computational Science and Discovery 8, 1 (2015), 125.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. [39] Chen Ling, Cui Jun, Tang Xing, Qian Yuntao, Li Yansheng, and Zhang Yongjun. 2022. RLPath: A knowledge graph link prediction method using reinforcement learning based attentive relation path searching and representation learning. Applied Intelligence 52, 4 (2022), 47154726.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. [40] Wu Hanrui, Long Jinyi, Li Nuosi, Yu Dahai, and Ng Michael K.. 2022. Adversarial auto-encoder domain adaptation for cold-start recommendation with positive and negative hypergraphs. ACM Transactions on Information Systems 41, 2 (2022), 125.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. [41] Shang Chao, Tang Yun, Huang Jing, Bi Jinbo, He Xiaodong, and Zhou Bowen. 2019. End-to-end structure-aware convolutional networks for knowledge base completion. In AAAI. 30603067.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. [42] Guo Lei, Yin Hongzhi, Chen Tong, Zhang Xiangliang, and Zheng Kai. 2021. Hierarchical hyperedge embedding-based representation learning for group recommendation. ACM Transactions on Information Systems 40, 1 (2021), 127.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. [43] Vaswani Ashish, Shazeer Noam, Parmar Niki, Uszkoreit Jakob, Jones Llion, Gomez Aidan N., Kaiser Łukasz, and Polosukhin Illia. 2017. Attention is all you need. In NIPS. 59986008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. [44] Lee John Boaz, Rossi Ryan A., Kim Sungchul, Ahmed Nesreen K., and Koh Eunyee. 2019. Attention models in graphs: A survey. ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data 13, 6 (2019), 1–25.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. [45] Zhao Yue, Cong Gao, Shi Jiachen, and Miao Chunyan. 2022. QueryFormer: A tree transformer model for query plan representation. In VLDB 15, 8 (2022), 16581670.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. [46] Bordes Antoine, Usunier Nicolas, Garcia-Duran Alberto, Weston Jason, and Yakhnenko Oksana. 2013. Translating embeddings for modeling multi-relational data. In NIPS. 27872795.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. [47] Elizabeth Boschee, Jennifer Lautenschlager, Sean O'Brien, Steve Shellman, James Starz, and Michael Ward. 2015. ICEWS Coded Event Data. Harvard Dataverse. DOI:Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  48. [48] Atzmueller Martin. 2019. Onto model-based anomalous link pattern mining on feature-rich social interaction networks. In Companion Proceedings of the 27th World Wide Web Conference. 10471050.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. [49] Dunlavy Daniel M., Kolda Tamara G., and Acar Evrim. 2011. Temporal link prediction using matrix and tensor factorizations. ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data 5, 2 (2011), 127.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. DHyper: A Recurrent Dual Hypergraph Neural Network for Event Prediction in Temporal Knowledge Graphs

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Full Access

    • Published in

      cover image ACM Transactions on Information Systems
      ACM Transactions on Information Systems  Volume 42, Issue 5
      September 2024
      612 pages
      ISSN:1046-8188
      EISSN:1558-2868
      DOI:10.1145/3618083
      Issue’s Table of Contents

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 29 April 2024
      • Online AM: 18 March 2024
      • Accepted: 6 March 2024
      • Revised: 2 February 2024
      • Received: 27 April 2023
      Published in tois Volume 42, Issue 5

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)222
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)222

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Full Text

    View this article in Full Text.

    View Full Text