Skip to main content
Log in

Machinability of a Sinter-Hardened Powder Metallurgy Steel: Combined Analysis of Cutting Force and Chip Characteristics

  • Published:
Powder Metallurgy and Metal Ceramics Aims and scope

This study investigates the machining of FLC-4608 (designation by Metal Powder Industries Federation, standard 35) sinter-hardened steel compacts with 90% relative density during turning operation. The objective of the study is to analyze the effect of cutting velocity and feed rate on the cutting force component in the direction of cutting motion using chip characteristics. The results showed that the combination of high cutting velocity and low feed rate is the appropriate condition to obtain a low value of the cutting force component. The results also indicated that the machining configurations considered produce shear-localized segmented chips, also known as saw tooth chips, and that the chip formation process involves almost complete densification of the uncut chip material. Except for chip length, all the investigated chip characteristics, minimum and maximum chip thickness, shear band microstructure, and structure below the tip of the chip segment were consistent with the results of the cutting force component. As the feed rate increased, the minimum and maximum chip thickness increased, which was consistent with the increasing value of the cutting force component. Similarly, through the microstructure of the adiabatic shear band and the structure below the tip of the chip segment, increasing cutting velocity showed the dominance of the thermal softening effect over strain hardening and strain rate hardening, consistent with the decreasing value of the cutting force component. This approach is novel, as chip characteristics have received little attention in previous studies on the machining of PM materials. The present study is potentially helpful to the PM industry in achieving better machining process control through a thorough understanding of the results related to the cutting force component in the direction of the cutting motion. The future scope discussed in this report also has prospects for advancing the science of machining PM materials.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 7.
Fig. 8.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. N.B. Ullen, “Characterization of machinability of sintered steel foams having different porosities during drilling operation,” Mach. Sci. Technol., 25, Issue 4, 527–557 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1080/10910344.2020.1815051.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. B. Hu, R. Warzel III, S. Ropar, and A. Neilan The effect of porosity on machinability of PM materials. Int. J. Powder Metall. 2017. Vol. 53, Issue 1. P. 27–36.

  3. O.R. Tutunea-Fatan, M.A. Fakhri, and E.V. Bordatchev, “Porosity and cutting forces: From macroscale to microscale machining correlations,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part B. J. Eng. Manuf., 225, Issue 5, 619–630 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1177/2041297510394057.

  4. E. Alizadeh, “Factors influencing the machinability of sintered steels,” Powder Metall. Met. Ceram., 47, 304–315 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11106-008-9021-7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. A. Salak, M. Selecka, and H. Danninger, Machinability of Powder Metallurgy Steels, First ed., Cambridge International Science Publishing, Cambridge (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  6. T. Obikawa, T. Ohno, T. Maetani, and Y. Ozaki, “Machining of sintered steel under different lubrication conditions,” Mach. Sci. Technol., 22, Issue 2, 338–352 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/10910344.2017.1365893.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. J.S. Agapiou and M.F. DeVries, “Machinability of powder metallurgy materials,” Int. J. Powder Metall., 24, Issue 1, 47–57 (1988).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. A. Salak, M. Selecka, K. Vasilko, and H. Danninger, “Face turning of PM steels: Effect of porosity and carbon level,” Int. J. Powder. Metall., 44, Issue 2, 49–61 (2008).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Z. Zurecki, R. Ghosh, and J.H. Frey, Finish-Turning of Hardened Powder-Metallurgy Steel using Cryogenic Cooling, Presented at International Conference on Powder Metallurgy and Particulate Materials 2003 (PM2TEC 2003), Las Vegas, USA (2003).

  10. A. Kurt and H. Ates, “Effect of porosity on thermal conductivity of powder metal materials,” Mater. Des., 28, Issue 1, 230–233 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2005.06.020.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. J.S. Agapiou, G.W. Halldin, and M.F. De Vries, “On the machinability of powder metallurgy austenitic stainless steels,” J. Manuf. Sci. Eng., Trans ASME, 110, Issue 4, 339–343 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3187892.

  12. M. Czampa, S. Markos, and T. Szalay, “Improvement of drilling possibilities for machining powder metallurgy materials,” Proc. CIRP, 7, 288–293 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2013.05.049.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. C. Blais and G. l’Esperance, “Turning and drilling of parts made from sinter-hardenable steel powders,” Powder Metall., 45, No. 1, 39–47 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1179/003258902225001597.

  14. C. Chang, G. Smith, and G. Littlefair, “The assessment of powder metallurgy machinability by using TiCN/Al2O3 cutting tools,” SAE Technical Paper, pp. 273–277 (2003). https://doi.org/10.4271/2003-01-2870.

  15. R. M’Saoubi, T. Czotscher, O. Andersson, and D. Meyer, “Machinability of powder metallurgy steels using PcBN inserts,” Procedia CIRP (6th CIRP International conference on High Performance Cutting, HPC 2014), 14, 83–88 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2014.03.094.

  16. M. Czampa, I. Biro, and T. Szalay, “A novel machinability test for determining the cutting behaviour of iron-based, carbon-containing, and copper-containing powder metallurgy steels (PMS),” The Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 89, 3495–3507 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-9313-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. G.T. Smith, “Surface integrity aspects of machinability testing of Fe–C–Cu powder metallurgy components,” Powder Metall., 33, Issue 2, 157–164 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1179/pom.1990.33.2.157.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. G.T. Smith, “Getting the measure of PM machinability,” Metal Powder Rep., 53, Issue 5, 31–35 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0026-0657(98)85009-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. U. Engstrom, “Machinability of sintered steels,” Powder Metall., 26, Issue 3, 137–144 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1179/pom.1983.26.3.137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. H. Kulkarni and V.V. Dabhade, “Influence of MnS in processing and applications of sintered Fe–Cu–C alloys: An overview,” Mater. Today: Proc., 5, Issue 9/1, 17277–17283 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2018.04.139.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. W.-F. Wang, “Effect of MnS powder additions on corrosion resistance of sintered 304L stainless steels,” Powder Metall., 45, Issue 1, 48–52 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1179/003258902225001515.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. H. Kulkarni and V.V. Dabhade, “Green machining of powder-metallurgy-steels (PMS): An overview,” J. Manuf. Proc., 44, 1–18 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2019.05.009.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. H. Kulkarni, V.V. Dabhade, and C. Blais, “Analysis of machining green compacts of a sinter-hardenable powder metallurgy steel: A perspective of material removal mechanism,” CIRP J. Manuf. Sci. Technol., 41, 430–445 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirpj.2022.12.018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. E. Robert-Perron, C. Blais, Y. Thomas, S. Pelletier, and M. Dionne, “An integrated approach to the characterization of powder metallurgy components performance during green machining,” Mater. Sci. Eng.: A, 402, Issue 1–2, 325–334 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2005.05.019.

  25. E. Robert-Perron, C. Blais, S. Pelletier, and Y. Thomas, “Machinability of green powder metallurgy components: Part I. Characterization of the influence of tool wear,” Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 38, 1330–1336 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-007-9191-9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. E. Robert-Perron, C. Blais, S. Pelletier, and Y. Thomas, “Machinability of green powder metallurgy components: Part II. Sintered properties of components machined green state,” Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 38, 1337–1342 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-007-9187-5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. J. Desbiens, E. Robert-Perron, C. Blais, and F. Chagnon, “Effect of green machining on the tensile properties and fatigue strength of powder metallurgy sinter-hardenable steel components,” Mater. Sci. Eng.: A, 546, 218–222 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2012.03.054.

  28. A. Benner and P. Beiss, “Wear aspects during green machining of warm compacted PM steels,” Mater. Sci. Eng. Technol., 35, Issue 10–11, 663–669 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1002/mawe.200400792.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. C.C. Degnan, A.R. Kennedy, and P.H. Shipway, “Relationship between physical structure and machinability of green compacts,” Powder Metall., 50, Issue 1, 14–20 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1179/174329007X153251.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. C. Blais, G. L'Espérance, and I. Bourgeois, “Characterisation of machinability of sintered steels during drilling operations,” Powder Metall., 44, Issue 1, 67–76 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1179/003258901666194.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. T. Khantisitthiporn, M. Morakotjinda, B. Vetayanugul, and R. Tongsri, “Machined surface quality of pre-sintered hardenable PM steel,” Key Eng. Mater., 659, 335–339 (2015). https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.659.335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. N. Igarashi, Y. Sonoda, R. Take, and H. Terai, “High-quality high-productivity manufacturing of variable valve timing parts by green machining,” SEI Technical Rev., 85, 48–53 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  33. C.Z. Duan and L.C. Zhang, “Adiabatic shear banding in AISI 1045 steel during high speed machining: Mechanisms of microstructural evolution,” Mater. Sci. Eng.: A, 532, 111–119 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2011.10.071.

  34. C. Duan and M. Wang, “A review of microstructural evolution in the adiabatic shear bands induced by high speed machining,” Acta Metall. Sin., 26, 97–112 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40195-013-2001-z.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Z.P. Wan, Y.E. Zhu, H.W. Liu, and Y. Tang, “Microstructure evolution of adiabatic shear bands and mechanisms of saw-tooth chip formation in machining Ti–6Al–4V,” Mater. Sci. Eng.: A, 531, 155–163 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2011.10.050.

  36. J. Barry and G. Byrne, “The mechanisms of chip formation in machining hardened steels,” J. Manuf. Sci. Eng., 124, Issue 3, 528–535 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1455643.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. R. Komanduri and B.F. von Turkovich, “New observations on the mechanism of chip formation when machining Titanium alloys,” Wear, 69, Issue 2, 179–188 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1016/0043-1648(81)90242-8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. R. Komanduri, T. Schroeder, J. Hazra, B.F. von Turkovich, and D.G. Flom, “On the catastrophic shear instability in high speed machining of an AISI 4340 steel,” ASME J. Eng. Ind., 104, Issue 2, 121–131 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3185807.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. M.A. Davies, T.J. Burns, and C.J. Evans, “On the dynamics of chip formation in machining hard metals. CIRP Annals,” 46, Issue 1, 25–30 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0007-8506(07)60768-9.

  40. A. Molinari, C. Musquar, and G. Sutter, “Adiabatic shear banding in high-speed machining of Ti–6Al–4V: Experiments and modeling,” Int. J. Plastic., 18, Issue 4, 443–459 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-6419(01)00003-1.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. K. Nakayama, M. Arai, and T. Kanda, “Machining characteristics of hard materials,” CIRP Annals., 37, Issue 1, 89–92 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0007-8506(07)61592-3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. A. Vyas and M.C. Shaw, “Mechanics of saw-tooth chip formation in metal cutting,” ASME. J. Manuf. Sci. Eng., 121, Issue 2, 163–172 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2831200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. M.A. Elbestawi, A.K. Srivastava, and T.I. El-Wardany, “A model for chip formation during machining of hardened steel,” CIRP Annals., 45, Issue 1, 71–76 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0007-8506(07)63019-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. M.C. Shaw, Sawtooth Chip Formation, Chapter 22, Metal Cutting Principles, Second Ed., Oxford University Press (2005).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vikram V. Dabhade.

Additional information

Published in Poroshkova Metallurgiya, Vol. 62, Vol. 62, Nos. 7–8 (552), pp. 81–97, 2023.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kulkarni, H., Dabhade, V.V. Machinability of a Sinter-Hardened Powder Metallurgy Steel: Combined Analysis of Cutting Force and Chip Characteristics. Powder Metall Met Ceram 62, 445–458 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11106-024-00406-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11106-024-00406-8

Keywords

Navigation