Skip to main content
Log in

The impact of land uses on the diversity and farmers' preferences for woody species in the selected highlands of Ethiopia

  • Published:
Agroforestry Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Various woody species are growing in diverse landscapes and form a prominent component of farmland in Ethiopia. Farmers' preferences for woody species also vary in different parts of the country. The diversity and farmers' preferences for woody species have been described earlier. However, a simultaneous analysis of land use diversity and farmers’ preferences for woody species is scarcely available. Therefore, to fill the gap, this study was conducted in three selected highlands of Ethiopia to assess the land use diversity and farmers' preferences for woody species. A total of 320 households were randomly selected, and out of these, 105 households were purposely selected for species inventory. Overall, 525 plots were made using a 30 m × 30 m plot size for different land uses. Focus group discussion and key informant interviews were used for farmers’ preferences. The results imply that 32 woody species belonging to 16 families were recognized. Fabaceae was the leading family with 25% of species, followed by Rosaceae with 12.5% of species. In terms of species diversity, home garden (2.39) was more diverse than grazing land (1.94), crop land (1.50), boundary (0.92), and woodlot (0.54) in all areas. Among the preferred species, Eucalyptus globulus, Cuppressus lusitanica, Malus domestica, Cytisus proliferus, and Acacia decurrens were the most preferred and planted woody species by farmers. Generally, farmland maintains various tree and shrub species according to landscape practices. Farmers preferred and planted different woody species based on their benefits. Woody species must be maintained on farmland to overcome socio-economic and environmental problems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data

This manuscript is the original work. So all data are available in the hand of the author and all materials are cited carefully in the reference.

References

  • Abebe T, Wiersum KF, Bongers F (2010) Spatial and temporal variation in crop diversity in agroforestry homegardens of southern Ethiopia. Agrofor Syst 78(3):309–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abide EB, Asfaw Z (2022) On-farm tree species diversity and management in semi-arid of Lemo district. Southern Ethiopia Agroforestry Systems 96(5–6):817–828

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agidie, A., Ayele, B., Wassie, A., Hadgu, K.M., Aynekulu, E. and Mowo, J., 2014. Agroforestry practices and farmers’ perception in Koga watershed, upper blue Nile basin, Ethiopia. Agriculture & Forestry/Poljoprivreda i Sumarstvo60(2).

  • Aladi, S.F. and John, O.O., 2014. Farmers’ perception of opportunities preferences and obstacles of growing multipurpose trees on farmland in Kogi State. European Scientific Journal10(14).

  • Alem S, Pavlis J (2012) Native woody plants diversity and density under Eucalyptus camaldulensis plantation, in Gibie Valley, South Western Ethiopia. Open Journal of Forestry 2(4):232–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amare D, Wondie M, Mekuria W, Darr D (2019) Agroforestry of smallholder farmers in Ethiopia: practices and benefits. Small-Scale Forestry 18(1):39–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amberber M, Argaw M, Asfaw Z (2014) The role of homegarden for in situ conservations of plant biodiversity in Holeta Town: Oromia National Regional State, Ethiopia. International Journal of Biodiversity and Conservation 6(1):8–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ango, T.G., Borjeson, L., Senbeta, F. and Hylander, K., 2014. Balancing ecosystem services and disservices: smallholder farmers’ use and management of forest and trees in an agricultural landscape in southwestern Ethiopia. Ecology and Society, 19(1).

  • Barrios E, Valencia V, Jonsson M, Brauman A, Hairiah K, Mortimer PE, Okubo S (2018) Contribution of trees to the conservation of biodiversity and ecosystem services in agricultural landscapes. International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services & Management 14(1):1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bekele-Tesemma, A. and Tengnas, B., 2007. Useful trees and shrubs of Ethiopia: identification, propagation, and management for 17 agroclimatic zones (p. 552). Nirobi: RELMA in ICRAF Project, World Agroforestry Centre, Eastern Africa Region.

  • Bock CE, Jones ZF, Bock JH (2007) Relationships between species richness, evenness, and abundance in a southwestern savanna. Ecology 88(5):1322–1327

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chakraborty M, Haider MZ, Rahaman MM (2015) Farmers’ Preferences and Perceptions towards Cropland Agroforestry in Bangladesh. Journal of Forest and Environmental Science 31(4):241–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dagar, J.C. and Tewari, V.P., 2017. Evolution of agroforestry as a modern science. Agroforestry: Anecdotal to modern science, pp.13–90.

  • Derero A, Coe R, Muthuri C, Hadgu KM, Sinclair F (2021) Farmer-led approaches to increasing tree diversity in fields and farmed landscapes in Ethiopia. Agrofor Syst 95:1309–1326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dibaba A, Soromessa T, Kelbessa E, Tilahun A (2014) Diversity, Structure and Regeneration Status of the Woodland and Riverine Vegetation of Sire Beggo in Gololcha District: Eastern Ethiopia. Ethiopian Journal of Science 6(1):70–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Duguma LA, Atela J, Minang PA, Ayana AN, Gizachew B, Nzyoka JM, Bernard F (2019) Deforestation and forest degradation as an environmental behavior: unpacking realities shaping community actions. Land 8(2):26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dumont ES, Gassner A, Agaba G, Nansamba R, Sinclair F (2019) The utility of farmer ranking of tree attributes for selecting companion trees in coffee production systems. Agrofor Syst 93(4):1469–1483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Endale Y, Derero A, Argaw M, Muthuri C (2017) Farmland tree species diversity and spatial distribution pattern in semi-arid East Shewa, Ethiopia. Forests, Trees and Livelihoods 26(3):199–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faye MD, Weber JC, Mounkoro B, Dakouo JM (2010) Contribution of parkland trees to farmers’ livelihoods: a case study from Mali. Dev Pract 20(3):428–434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fifanou VG, Ousmane C, Gauthier B, Brice S (2011) Traditional agroforestry systems and biodiversity conservation in Benin (West Africa). Agrofor Syst 82:1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guyassa E, Raj AJ (2013) Assessment of biodiversity in cropland agroforestry and its role in livelihood development in dry land areas: A case study from Tigray region. Ethiopia Journal of Agricultural Technology 9(4):829–844

    Google Scholar 

  • Iiyama M, Derero A, Kelemu K, Muthuri C, Kinuthia R, Ayenkulu E, Kiptot E, Hadgu K, Mowo J, Sinclair LF (2017) Understanding patterns of tree adoption on farms in semiarid and sub-humid Ethiopia. Agroforestry Syst 9192:271–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jemal O, Callo-Concha D, Van Noordwijk M (2018) Local agroforestry practices for food and nutrition security of smallholder farm households in southwestern Ethiopia. Sustainability 10(8):2722

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kebede M, Yirdaw E, Luukkanen O, Lemenih M (2013) Plant community analysis and effect of environmental factors on the diversity of woody species in the moist Afromontane forest of Wondo Genet, South Central Ethiopia. Biodiversity Research and Conservation 29(2013):63–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kent, M., 2011. Vegetation Description and Analysis: A practical approach. John Wiley and Sons.

  • Kibet S (2011) Plant communities, species diversity, richness, and regeneration of a traditionally managed coastal forest. Kenya Forest Ecology and Management 261(6):949–957

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kidane L, Kejela A (2021) Food security and environment conservation through sustainable use of wild and semi-wild edible plants: a case study in Berek Natural Forest, Oromia special zone. Ethiopia Agriculture & Food Security 10(1):29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuyah S, Öborn I, Jonsson M, Dahlin AS, Barrios E, Muthuri C, Malmer A, Nyaga J, Magaju C, Namirembe S, Nyberg Y (2016) Trees in agricultural landscapes enhance provision of ecosystem services in Sub-Saharan Africa. International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services & Management 12(4):255–273

    Google Scholar 

  • Legesse, A. and Negash, M., 2021. Species diversity, composition, structure and management in agroforestry systems: the case of Kachabira district, Southern Ethiopia. Heliyon7(3).

  • Lemenih M, Kassa H (2014) Re-greening Ethiopia: history, challenges and lessons. Forests 5(7):1717–1730

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandila, B., Hitimana, J., Kiplagat, A., Mengich, E. and Wekesa, T., 2015. Prevalence and adoption of agroforestry technologies and practices in Semi-Arid Regions of West-Pokot County, Kenya. Research Journal of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences. ISSN2320, p.6063.

  • Mekonnen EL, Asfaw Z, Zewudie S (2014) Plant species diversity of homegarden agroforestry in Jabithenan District, North-Western Ethiopia. Int J Biodivers Conserv 6:301–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mekonen T, Giday M, Kelbessa E (2015) Ethno-botanical study of homegarden plants in Sebeta-Awas District of the Oromia Region of Ethiopia to assess use, species diversity and management practices. Journal of Ethno-Biology and Ethno-Medicine 11(1):1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Mekonnen K, Jogo W, Bezabih M, Mulema A, Thorne P (2019) Determinants of survival and growth of tree lucerne (Chamaecytisus palmensis) in the crop-livestock farming systems of the Ethiopian highlands. Agrofor Syst 93:279–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mengistu B, Asfaw Z (2016) Woody Species Diversity and Structure of Agroforestry and Adjacent Land Uses in Dello-Menna District: South East Ethiopia. Natural Resources 7(10):515–534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Misgana D, Shibru S, Chauhan R (2020) Woody species diversity, structure and biomass carbon of parkland agroforestry practices in Gindeberet District, West Shewa Zone, Oromia Regional State, Ethiopia. International Journal of Biodiversity and Conservation 12(1):1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molla A, Kewessa G (2015) Woody species diversity in traditional agroforestry practices of Dellomenna District, Southeastern Ethiopia: Implication for maintaining native woody species. International Journal of Biodiversity 3:1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molla, T., Asfaw, Z., Muluneh, M.G. and Worku, B.B., 2023. Diversity of woody species in traditional agroforestry practices in Wondo district, south-central Ethiopia. Heliyon9(2).

  • Mulugeta G, Admassu M (2014) Woody Species Diversity and their Preferences on Farmers’ land holding. Journal of Natural Sciences Research 4(9):96–108

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulukh DD, Mhaiske VM, Narkhede SS, Patil VK, Rane AD (2018) Farmers’ preferences for indigenous trees suitable for agroforestry technologies in Ratnagiri District of Maharashtra State. Adv Agr Res Technol J 2(1):33–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Nyaga J, Barrios E, Muthuri CW, Öborn I, Matiru V, Sinclair FL (2015) Evaluating factors influencing heterogeneity in agroforestry adoption and practices within smallholder farms in Rift Valley, Kenya. Agr Ecosyst Environ 212:106–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roothaert RL, Franzel S (2001) Farmers’ preferences and use of local fodder trees and shrubs in Kenya. Agrofor Syst 52(3):239–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanon HO, Kabore-Zoungrana C, Ledin I (2007) Behaviour of goats, sheep and cattle and their selection of browse species on natural pasture in a Sahelian area. Small Rumin Res 67(1):64–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanou, J., Zougmore, R., Bayala, J. and Teklehaimanot, Z., 2010. Soil infiltrability and water content as affected by Baobab (Adansonia digitata L.) and Nere (Parkia biglobosa (Jacq.) Benth.) Trees in farmed parklands of West Africa. Soil use and management26(1), pp.75–81.

  • Sinclair, F., Wezel, A., Mbow, C., Chomba, S., Robiglio, V. and Harrison, R., 2019. The contribution of agroecological approaches to realizing climate-resilient agriculture. GCA: Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

  • Singh A, Kumar A (2014) Critical issue in Poplar-based agroforestry system. Indian Journal of Agroforestry 16(1):58–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Tefera B, Ruelle ML, Asfaw Z, Abraha Tsegay B (2014) Woody plant diversity in an afromontane agricultural landscape Debark District: Northern Ethiopia. Forests Trees and Livelihoods 23(4):261–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tekle T, Maryo M (2022) Ecological Assessment of Woody Plant Diversity and the Associated Threats in Afromontane Forest of Ambericho. Southern Ethiopia Journal of Landscape Ecology 15(2):102–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tolera M, Asfaw Z, Lemenih M, Karltun E (2008) Woody species diversity in a changing landscape in the south-central highlands of Ethiopia. Agr Ecosyst Environ 128(1–2):52–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsegaye B (2019) Effect of land use and land cover changes on soil erosion in Ethiopia. International Journal of Agricultural Science and Food Technology 5(1):026–034

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyynela TM (2001) Species diversity in Eucalyptus camaldulensis woodlots and miombo woodland in Northeastern Zimbabwe. New for 22(3):239–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wari BN, Feyssa DH, Kebebew Z (2019) Assessment of woody species in agroforestry systems around Jimma Town: Southwestern Ethiopia. International Journal of Biodiversity and Conservation 11(1):18–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Worku M, Lindner A, Berger U (2015) Management Effects on Woody Species Diversity and Vegetation Structure of Coffee-based Agroforestry Systems in Ethiopia. Small-Scale Forestry 14(4):531–551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamane T (1967) Statistics: an introductory analysis, 2nd edn. Harper and Row, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Zerga B, Berta A (2016) Preference, purpose, and pattern of Eucalyptus tree farming in Eza Wereda. Ethiopia IJRIES 3(2):30–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao H, Gu B, Lindley S, Zhu T, Fan J (2023) Regulation factors driving vegetation changes in China during the past 20 years. J Geog Sci 33:508–528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zomer RJ, Neufeldt H, Xu J, Ahrends A, Bossio D, Trabucco A, Van Noordwijk M, Wang M (2016) Global Tree Cover and Biomass Carbon on Agricultural Land: The contribution of agroforestry to global and national carbon budgets. Sci Rep 6(1):29987

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

First, we would like to give our great thanks to our Almighty God for helping us in all our life. Also, we would like to express our deepest gratitude to Getinat Seyid and Hailu Belay for their unreserved guidance and encouragement. Our thanks go to Dagim Amare, Marshet Nigatu, Bayisa Kebede, Shibiru Gudeta, and Bogale Raya, who helped us during data collection. Special thanks go to the SIDA project program, the Ethiopian Environment and Forest Research Institute, and the Jimma Environment and Forest Research Center for the financial assistance and material support. Our thanks also go to the Environmental Protection, Forestry, and Climate Change Offices of Sinan, Welmera, and Yem woreda for giving us the essential data about study areas. We are also grateful to Tach Chabi, Welmera Choge, and Shewsher Almama kebele administrators and farmers for their endless provision during data collection.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

The authors have responsibility for the following: study conception and design, data collection, analysis and interpretation of results, and manuscript preparation.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fekadu Hailu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.

Ethics statement

This is our original manuscript that has not published before, and is not currently under consideration by another journal and also all sources in the manuscript were cited carefully. We have taken a responsible for the submission of this research article and we accept the conditions of submission agreement.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendices

Appendix

Appendix 1: List of trees and shrubs species found in the study areas

No

Scientific name

Family name

Origin

Type

1

Acacia abyssinica

Fabaceae

Indigenous

Tree

2

Acacia decurrens

Fabaceae

Exotic

Tree

3

Acacia melanoxylon

Fabaceae

Exotic

Tree

4

Azadirachta indica

Meliaceae

Exotic

Tree

5

Cytisus proliferous

Fabaceae

Exotic

Shrub

6

Cordia africana

Boraginaceae

Indigenous

Tree

7

Croton macrostachyus

Euphorbiaceae

Indigenous

Tree

8

Cuppressus lusitanica

Cupressaceae

Exotic

Tree

9

Dombeya torrida

Sterculiaceae

Indigenous

Tree

10

Ekebergia capensis

Meliaceae

Indigenous

Tree

11

Erythrina abyssinica

Fabaceae

Indigenous

Tree

12

Erythrina brucei

Fabaceae

Indigenous

Tree

13

Eucalyptus globulus

Myrtaceae

Exotic

Tree

14

Eucalyptus camaldulensis

Myrtaceae

Exotic

Tree

15

Ficus sur

Moraceae

Indigenous

Tree

16

Grevillea robusta

Proteaceae

Exotic

Tree

17

Hagenia abyssinica

Rosaceae

Indigenous

Tree

18

Juniperus procera

Cupressaceae

Indigenous

Tree

19

Malus domestica

Rosaceae

Exotic

Tree

20

Millettia ferruginea

Fabaceae

Indigenous

Tree

21

Morus alba

Moraceae

Exotic

Tree

22

Olea europaea

Olacaceae

Indigenous

Tree

23

Persea americana

Lauraceae

Exotic

Tree

24

Podocarpus falcatus

Podocarpaceae

Indigenous

Tree

25

Prunus domestica

Rosaceae

Exotic

Tree

26

Rhus glutinosa

Anacardiaceae

Indigenous

Shrub

27

Rhus natalensis

Anacardiaceae

Indigenous

Shrub

28

Ricinus communis

Euphorbiaceae

Indigenous

Shrub

29

Rosa abyssinica

Rosaceae

Indigenous

Shrub

30

Sesbania sesban

Fabaceae

Indigenous

Shrub

31

Vernonia amygdalina

Asteraceae

Indigenous

Shrub

32

Yushania alpina

Poaceae

Indigenous

Woody grass

Appendix 2: Importance value index of woody species in five land use types

Important value index of species

No

Species name

Land use categories

Average IVI

HG

BD

WL

CL

GL

1

Eucalyptus globulus

47.03

146.7

197.5

78.26

2

Cytisus proliferous

6.86

4.15

118.0

35.94

32.99

3

Cuppressus lusitanica

63.50

59.11

35.45

4.52

32.51

4

Acacia decurrens

20.41

8.47

5.98

56.54

46.52

27.59

5

Juniperus procera

8.07

21.99

3.46

73.18

21.34

6

Yushania alpina

13.64

15.97

48.77

15.68

7

Erythrina brucei

4.30

3.98

33.48

27.35

13.82

8

Vernonia amygdalina

12.55

4.31

24.51

18.81

12.04

9

Ficus sur

2.78

2.18

14.84

26.64

9.29

10

Acacia abyssinica

2.18

9.39

32.32

8.78

11

Malus domestica

28.51

8.55

7.41

12

Eucalyptus camaldulensis

1.02

13.63

8.11

4.55

13

Prunus domestica

22.12

4.42

14

Persea americana

18.69

3.74

15

Erythrina abyssinica

1.02

3.73

13.05

3.56

16

Grevillea robusta

15.16

2.18

3.47

17

Cordia africana

1.72

10.43

3.86

3.20

18

Ekebergia capensis

5.87

8.45

2.86

19

Croton macrostachyus

3.97

3.46

3.86

2.26

20

Hagenia abyssinica

1.02

2.88

6.16

2.01

21

Olea europaea

2.11

3.46

3.86

1.89

22

Sesbania sesban

7.66

1.53

23

Rhus glutinosa

7.33

1.47

24

Acacia melanoxylon

6.51

1.30

25

Millettia ferruginea

3.46

0.69

26

Dombeya torrida

3.34

0.67

27

Podocarpus falcatus

3.29

0.66

28

Azadirachta indica

2.49

0.50

29

Ricinus communis

2.48

0.50

30

Rhus natalensis

2.11

0.42

31

Morus alba

1.99

0.40

32

Rosa abyssinica

1.02

0.20

 

Total

300

300

300

300

300

300

HG-Homegarden BD-Boundary planting WL-Woodlot CL-Crop land GL-Grazing land.

Appendix 3: The lists of recorded species in decreasing order of basal area

Basal area of species in (m2/ha)

No

Species name

Land use categories

Total BA

HG

BD

WL

CL

GL

1

Eucalyptus globulus

4.17

33.72

14.02

51.91

2

Cuppressus lusitanica

1.25

8.21

16.29

0.05

25.81

3

Eucalyptus camaldulensis

0.03

12.61

3.89

16.54

4

Ficus sur

1.67

5.34

0.67

1.49

9.17

5

Yushania alpina

0.60

1.97

5.32

7.88

6

Juniperus procera

0.39

3.68

0.06

2.33

6.46

7

Acacia decurrens

0.28

2.31

0.85

0.32

0.61

4.37

8

Croton macrostachyus

2.15

0.31

1.07

3.53

9

Erythrina abyssinica

0.15

1.71

1.26

3.12

10

Cordia africana

1.09

0.83

1.07

2.99

11

Acacia abyssinica

0.98

0.50

0.91

2.40

12

Dombeya torrida

2.05

2.05

13

Grevillea robusta

0.39

1.41

1.80

14

Erythrina brucei

0.36

0.89

0.14

0.31

1.70

15

Vernonia amygdalina

0.28

0.41

0.27

0.33

1.29

16

Acacia melanoxylon

0.80

0.80

17

Cytisus proliferous -

0.31

0.19

0.17

0.09

0.75

18

Olea europaea

0.47

0.11

0.09

0.67

19

Azadirachta indica

0.63

0.63

20

Persea americana

0.63

0.63

21

Hagenia abyssinica

0.06

0.32

0.17

0.55

22

Malus domestica

0.27

0.13

0.40

23

Ekebergia capensis

0.13

0.25

0.38

24

Podocarpus falcatus

0.37

0.37

25

Sesbania sesban

0.14

0.14

26

Rhus glutinosa

0.14

0.14

27

Prunus domestica

0.08

0.08

28

Ricinus communis

0.07

0.07

29

Millettia ferruginea

0.06

0.06

30

Rosa abyssinica

0.04

0.04

31

Rhus natalensis

0.04

0.04

32

Morus alba

0.03

0.03

 

Total

15.95

76.56

40.57

3.74

9.99

146.80

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hailu, F., Derero, A. & Aticho, A. The impact of land uses on the diversity and farmers' preferences for woody species in the selected highlands of Ethiopia. Agroforest Syst (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-024-00978-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-024-00978-9

Keywords

Navigation