Skip to main content
Log in

Customized ventral bony and dural opening in the transplanum/transtuberculum and transclival variants of extended endoscopic endonasal approach to suprasellar craniopharyngiomas: an approach-based stepwise cadaveric dissection and clinical applicability

  • How I Do it
  • Published:
Acta Neurochirurgica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Optimal initial exposure through an extended endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) for suprasellar craniopharyngiomas ensures safe and unrestricted surgical access while avoiding overexposure, which may prolong the procedure and increase neurovascular adverse events.

Method

Here, the authors outline the surgical nuances of a customized bony and dural opening through the transplanum/transtuberculum and transclival variants of the extended EEA to suprasellar craniopharyngiomas based on the tumor–pituitary stalk relationship. A stepwise cadaveric dissection and intraoperative photographs relevant to the approaches are also provided.

Conclusion

Safe maximal resection of suprasellar craniopharyngiomas through extended EEAs can be feasibly and safely achieved by implementing of tailored ventral exposure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Not applicable.

Code availability

Not applicable.

Abbreviations

EEA:

Endoscopic endonasal approach

ICA:

Internal carotid artery

MOCR:

Medial opticocarotid recess

PCP:

Posterior clinoid process

SIS:

Superior intercavernous sinus

NSF:

Nasoseptal flap

CSF:

Cerebrospinal fluid

References

  1. de Divitiis E, Cappabianca P, Cavallo LM, Esposito F, de Divitiis O, Messina A (2007) Extended endoscopic transsphenoidal approach for extrasellar craniopharyngiomas. Neurosurgery 61(5 Suppl 2):219–27

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Fernandez-Miranda JC, Gardner PA, Rastelli MM Jr, Peris-Celda M, Koutourousiou M, Peace D et al (2014) Endoscopic endonasal transcavernous posterior clinoidectomy with interdural pituitary transposition. J Neurosurg 121(1):91–99

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Fernandez-Miranda JC, Gardner PA, Snyderman CH, Devaney KO, Strojan P, Suárez C et al (2012) Craniopharyngioma: a pathologic, clinical, and surgical review. Head Neck 34(7):1036–1044

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gardner PA, Kassam AB, Snyderman CH, Carrau RL, Mintz AH, Grahovac S et al (2008) Outcomes following endoscopic, expanded endonasal resection of suprasellar craniopharyngiomas: a case series. J Neurosurg 109(1):6–16

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Jeswani S, Nuño M, Wu A, Bonert V, Carmichael JD, Black KL et al (2016) Comparative analysis of outcomes following craniotomy and expanded endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal resection of craniopharyngioma and related tumors: a single-institution study. J Neurosurg 124(3):627–638

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kassam AB, Gardner PA, Snyderman CH, Carrau RL, Mintz AH, Prevedello DM (2008) Expanded endonasal approach, a fully endoscopic transnasal approach for the resection of midline suprasellar craniopharyngiomas: a new classification based on the infundibulum. J Neurosurg 108(4):715–728

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kassam A, Snyderman CH, Mintz A, Gardner P, Carrau RL (2005) Expanded endonasal approach: the rostrocaudal axis. Part I. Crista galli to the sella turcica. Neurosurg Focus 19(1):E3

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kassam A, Snyderman CH, Mintz A, Gardner P, Carrau RL (2005) Expanded endonasal approach: the rostrocaudal axis. Part Ii. Posterior clinoids to the foramen magnum. Neurosurg Focus 19(1):E4

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Khaleghi M, Vignolles-Jeong J, Otto B, Carrau R, Prevedello D (2023) Intraoperative ultrasound-assisted endoscopic endonasal transclival marsupialization of an ectopic retrosellar Rathke’s cleft cyst: a rare case illustration and systematic review of the literature. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 236:108050

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Komotar RJ, Starke RM, Raper DM, Anand VK, Schwartz TH (2012) Endoscopic endonasal compared with microscopic transsphenoidal and open transcranial resection of craniopharyngiomas. World Neurosurg 77(2):329–341

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Martinez-Gutierrez JC, D’Andrea MR, Cahill DP, Santagata S, Barker FG 2nd, Brastianos PK (2016) Diagnosis and management of craniopharyngiomas in the era of genomics and targeted therapy. Neurosurg Focus 41(6):E2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Rejane-Heim TC, Silveira-Bertazzo G, Carrau RL, Prevedello DM (2021) Surgical anatomy and nuances of the expanded endonasal transdorsum sellae and posterior clinoidectomy approach to the interpeduncular and prepontine cisterns: a stepwise cadaveric dissection of various pituitary gland transpositions. Acta Neurochir 163(2):407–413

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Writing, original draft, conceptualization, visualization, and software, MK; review and editing, DP; validation and supervision, BO, RC, and DP, MDA visualization.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel M. Prevedello.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

Not applicable.

Consent to participate

The patient consented to participate.

Consent for publication

The patient consented for publication.

Conflict of interest

Dr. Daniel Prevedello is a consultant for Stryker Corp., Medtronic Corp., BK Medical, and Integra; he has received an honorarium from Mizuho and royalties from KLS-Martin and ACE Medical. All other authors do not have a conflict of interest to report.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Key points

1. The extended EEA provides excellent access to the midline structures, spanning from the foramen magnum to the cribriform plate.

2. Two main advantages of EEA for suprasellar craniopharyngioma are achieving the optimal extent of resection and minimizing neurovascular manipulation.

3. Complete drilling of the tubercular recess and MOCRs is necessary to freely access the suprasellar cistern.

4. Exposing the opticocarotid cistern is a key to land on the epicenter of the preinfundibular CPs.

5. The division of the SIS is required in all types of suprasellar CPs.

6. An intradural pituitary hemitransposition and removal of dorsum sellae provides wide access to retroinfundibular CP.

7. Unilateral pituitary hemitransposition may preserve the gland’s function by establishing its venous return.

8. Intraoperative ultrasound could estimate subarachnoid tumor extension before dural opening.

9. Gross total tumor removal should be set as the main surgical goal whenever possible.

10. Safe subtotal resection followed by adjuvant therapy provides long-term outcomes similar to total resection.

The original version of this article was revised. The correct author group should be Mehdi Khaleghi, Bradly Otto, Ricardo Carrau, Daniel M. Prevedello, Moataz D. Abouammo and not Mehdi Khaleghi, Bradly Otto, Ricardo Carrau, Daniel M. Prevedello.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (MP4 44417 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Khaleghi, M., Otto, B., Carrau, R. et al. Customized ventral bony and dural opening in the transplanum/transtuberculum and transclival variants of extended endoscopic endonasal approach to suprasellar craniopharyngiomas: an approach-based stepwise cadaveric dissection and clinical applicability. Acta Neurochir 166, 146 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-024-06015-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-024-06015-z

Keywords

Navigation