Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Legal Lacunae of Presumption of Innocence Right Protection in Ethiopia

  • Published:
Journal of Human Rights and Social Work Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The criminal justice system seeks to balance the search for the truth with procedural fairness. Because of this, the law imposes a legal burden on the state to protect public security and suspected individuals’ rights. Among individual rights that need protection is a presumption of innocence until proven guilty. Presumption of innocence is a basic right in the Ethiopian constitution and subsidiary laws in Ethiopia which requires the public prosecutor to prove each element constituting the crime beyond reasonable doubt. However, this right is facing violation in the Ethiopian criminal justice system. Thus, this article examines challenges to the presumption of innocence rights in Ethiopia’s criminal justice system. Doctrinal research method is used in the investigation process. The study found various subsidiary substantive and procedural laws, and practices violate the presumption of innocence rights. Among others, several criminal law clauses do not require the public prosecutor to provide proof but instead take certain elements of particular crimes as proven, the Criminal Justice Administration Policy presumption to transfer the burden of proof in certain major crimes to the defendant, and anti-corruption and the vagrancy control proclamation permits prolonged remand time which compromise and deprive the suspected right to be presumed innocent until proven guilty. These laws shall be revised in a manner that protects the presumption of innocence rights.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ACHPR. (1982). African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights ("Banjul Charter"), 27 June 1981, CAB/LEG/67/3 rev. 5, 21 I.L.M. 58. https://www.refworld.org/docid/3ae6b3630.html. Accessed 28 Sep 2023.

  • ACHR. (1969). American Convention on Human Rights, "Pact of San Jose", Costa Rica, 22 November 1969. https://www.refworld.org/docid/3ae6b36510.html. Accessed 28 Sep 2023.

  • Assefa, S. K. (2012). The principle of the presumption of innocence and its challenges in the Ethiopian criminal process. Mizan Law Review, 6(2), 273–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Budianto, A. (2020). Legal research methodology reposition in research on social science. International Journal of Criminology and Sociology, 9(1), 1339–1346.

    Google Scholar 

  • CCPR/C/61/D/577/1994 (Polay Campos v Peru).

  • CCPR/C/69/D/770/1997 (Gridin v Russian Federation).

  • CCPR/C/73/D/788/1997 (Cagas et al. v. Philippines).

  • CCPR/C/54/D/473/1991 (Barroso v Panama).

  • Criminal Code. (2004). Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia Criminal Code, Proclamation No.414/2004.

  • Criminal Justice Administration Policy. (2011). FDRE criminal justice administration policy.

  • Criminal Procedure Code. (1961). "Proclamation No. 185." Extraordinary Issue 1.

  • Cole, R. J. V. (2010). Equality of arms and aspects of the right to a fair criminal trial in Botswana (Doctoral dissertation, Stellenbosch: University of Stellenbosch).

  • Chihaia, G. N., & Barbu, S. G. (2011). Short essay on presumption of innocence. ECHR precedent.

  • Demissie, W. (2009). The right to bail in Ethiopia: Respective roles of the court and the legislature. Journal of Ethiopian Law, 23(2), 3–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • ECHR. (1953). European Convention on Human Rights: European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, as amended by Protocols Nos. 11 and 14, ETS 5, 4 November 1950, https://www.refworld.org/legal/agreements/coe/1950/en/18688. Accessed 07 Jan 2024

  • FDRE Constitution. (1995). The constitution of the federal democratic Republic of Ethiopia.

  • Fisher, S. Z. (1969). Ethiopian criminal procedure: A sourcebook.

  • Gawas, V. M. (2017). Doctrinal legal research method a guiding principle in reforming the law and legal system towards the research development.

  • Gopaul, A. (2015). The impact and constitutionality of delayed trials on the rights of a suspect or accused person during criminal proceedings (Doctoral dissertation, University of South Africa).

  • Holland, N. H., & Chamberlin, H. H. (1972). Statutory criminal presumptions: Proof beyond a reasonable doubt. Valparaiso University Law Review, 7, 147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson, T. (2015). The doctrinal method: Incorporating interdisciplinary methods in reforming the law. Erasmus Law Review, 8, 130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson, T., & Duncan, N. (2012). Defining and describing what we do: Doctrinal legal research. Deakin Law Review, 17(1), 83–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ICCPR. (1966). International covenant on civil and political rights. United Nations Treaty Series, Vol. 999, p. 171. UN General Assembly. https://www.refworld.org/docid/3ae6b3aa0.html. Accessed 27 Sep 2023

  • International Criminal Court Statute. (2010). Rome stature of the international criminal court. UN General Assembly. https://www.refworld.org/docid/3ae6b3a84.html. Accessed 13 Oct 2023

  • Kiros, K. (2011). The bail justice in Ethiopia: Challenges of its administration. Unpublished, LLM Thesis, Addis Ababa University, School of Law Library, Addis Ababa.

  • Laudan, L. (2005). The presumption of innocence: Material or probatory? Legal Theory, 11(4), 333–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mole, N., & Harby, C. (2006). The right to a fair trial: A guide to the implementation of Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights (2nd edition). Council of Europe. https://www.refworld.org/reference/research/coe/2006/en/67017

  • Naughton, M. (2011). How the presumption of innocence renders the innocent vulnerable to wrongful convictions. Irish Journal of Legal Studies, 2, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nsenga, T. N. I. W. (2011). The presumption of innocence before the International Criminal Court (Doctoral dissertation, Oxford Brookes University).

  • Proclamation No. 236. (2001). National Legislative Bodies / National Authorities, Ethiopia: Proclamation No. 236/2001, Anti-Corruption Special Procedure and Rules of Evidence Proclamation, 24 May 2001.

  • Proclamation No. 239. (2001). National Legislative Bodies / National Authorities, Ethiopia: Proclamation No. 239/2001, Anti-Corruption Special Procedure and Rules of Evidence Proclamation, 12 June 2001.

  • Proclamation No. 384. (2004). National Legislative Bodies / National Authorities, Ethiopia: Proclamation No. 384/2004, Vagrancy Control Proclamation, 27 January 2004.

  • Proclamation No. 434. (2005). National Legislative Bodies / National Authorities, Ethiopia: Proclamation No. 434/2005, Revised Anti-Corruption Special Procedure and Rules of Evidence Proclamation, 27 January 2005.

  • Proclamation No. 652. (2009). National Legislative Bodies / National Authorities, Ethiopia: Proclamation No. 652/2009 of 2009, Anti-Terrorism Proclamation, 7 July 2009, available at: https://www.refworld.org/docid/4ba799d32.html. Accessed 13 Oct 2023

  • Proclamation No. 1176. (2020). National Legislative Bodies / National Authorities, Ethiopia: Proclamation No. 1176/2020, Prevention and Suppression of Terrorism Crimes Proclamation, 25 March 2020.

  • Smith, B. P. (2005). Did the presumption of innocence exist in summary proceedings? Law and History Review, 23(1), 191–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thayer, J. B. (1896). Presumption of innocence in criminal cases. Yale Law Journal, 6, 185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UN General Assembly. (1948). Universal declaration of human rights, 217 A (III). https://www.refworld.org/docid/3ae6b3712c.html. Accessed 26 Sep 2023

  • UN Human Rights Committee. (1984).  CCPR general comment No. 13: Article 14 (Administration of justice), equality before the courts and the right to a fair and public hearing by an independent court established by law. https://www.refworld.org/docid/453883f90.html. Accessed 13 Oct 2023

  • UN Human Rights Committee. (2007). General comment No. 32: Article 14, Right to equality before courts and tribunals and to a fair trial, CCPR/C/GC/32. https://www.refworld.org/legal/general/hrc/2007/en/52583. Accessed 13 Feb 2024

  • United Nations Human Rights Office of the High Commissioner. (2014). The convention on the rights of persons with disabilities.

  • Wodage, W. Y. (2010). Presumption of innocence and the requirement of proof beyond reasonable doubt: Reflections on meaning, scope and their place under Ethiopian law. In W. Demissie (Ed.), Human rights in criminal proce[e]dings: Normative and practical aspects. Addis Ababa Faculty of Law, Addis Ababa University.

  • Wodage, W. Y. (2014). Note: Burdens of proof, presumptions, and standards of proof in criminal cases. Mizan Law Review, 8(1), 252–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zemichael, H. A. (2014). The standard of proof in criminal proceedings: The threshold to prove guilt under Ethiopian law. Mizan Law Review, 8(1), 84–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I have respect for the reviewers.

Funding

No funding was received for conducting this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Human Rights Institute, Southwest University of Political Science and Law, Chongqing, China

    Estifanos Balew Liyew

Authors
  1. Estifanos Balew Liyew
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Estifanos Balew Liyew.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The author declares no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liyew, E.B. Legal Lacunae of Presumption of Innocence Right Protection in Ethiopia. J. Hum. Rights Soc. Work (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41134-024-00304-4

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41134-024-00304-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation