Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Real-World Outcomes of Dual Advanced Therapy in Children and Young Adults with Inflammatory Bowel Disease

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Digestive Diseases and Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Data are limited on the safety and efficacy of combining advanced therapies for refractory patients with IBD.

Aim

To evaluate the real-world efficacy and safety of dual advanced therapy (DAT), combining 2 biologics or a biologic with a small molecule, in children and young adults with refractory IBD.

Methods

Primary outcome of this single IBD center cohort was DAT remission (clinical and biomarker remission) at first assessment (T1). Secondary outcomes included remission at T2, if DAT de-intensification (De-I) occurred and T3, if T2 DAT re-intensification (Re-I) occurred. Efficacy and safety outcomes were described.

Results

Of the 30 patients [43% female, 30% CD, median age of 18.3 [15.1–19.8] years], all 11 UST + TOFA achieved T1 remission; 6/10 De-I failed at T2; and 4/4 Re-I achieved T3 remission. Of 9 VDZ + TOFA, 6 achieved T1 remission; 5/6 De-I failed at T2; and 1/1 failed T3 Re-I. Of 4 UST + VDZ, 3 achieved T1 remission; 2/3 De-I failed at T2; and 0 had Re-I. Of 5 UST + UPA, 4 achieved T1 remission; 1/5 De-I failed at T2 but recaptured T3 remission post-Re-I. One VDZ + OZA achieved T1 remission and maintained T2 remission post-De-I to OZA monotherapy. At last follow-up, 43% were on original DAT, 17% on one of original DAT, and 40% neither. One UST + TOFA patient developed mild leukopenia and another developed septic arthritis and venous thromboembolism on VDZ + TOFA and prednisone.

Conclusion

Most children and young adults treated with DAT achieved remission with minimal safety events; however, de-intensification had limited success.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kayal M, Posner H, Spencer E, Colombel J-F, Stalgis C, Ungaro RC. Net remission rates with biologic and small molecule treatment in ulcerative colitis: a reappraisal of the clinical trial data. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023;21:3433-3436.e1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kayal M, Ungaro RC, Bader G, Colombel J-F, Sandborn WJ, Stalgis C. Net remission rates with biologic treatment in Crohn’s disease: a reappraisal of the clinical trial data. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023;21:1348–1350.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ferrante M, Panaccione R, Baert F, Bossuyt P, Colombel J-F, Danese S et al. Risankizumab as maintenance therapy for moderately to severely active Crohn’s disease: results from the multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, withdrawal phase 3 FORTIFY maintenance trial. Lancet. 2022;399:2031–2046.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Stalgis C, Deepak P, Mehandru S, Colombel J-F. Rational combination therapy to overcome the plateau of drug efficacy in inflammatory bowel disease. Gastroenterology. 2021;161:394–399.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Feagan BG, Sands BE, Sandborn WJ, Germinaro M, Vetter M, Shao J et al. Guselkumab plus golimumab combination therapy versus guselkumab or golimumab monotherapy in patients with ulcerative colitis (VEGA): a randomised, double-blind, controlled, phase 2, proof-of-concept trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023;8:307–320.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Panaccione R, Ghosh S, Middleton S, Márquez JR, Scott BB, Flint L et al. Combination therapy with infliximab and azathioprine is superior to monotherapy with either agent in ulcerative colitis. Gastroenterology. 2014;146:392-400.e3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hirten RP, Iacucci M, Shah S, Ghosh S, Colombel J-F. Combining biologics in inflammatory bowel disease and other immune mediated inflammatory disorders. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018;16:1374–1384.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Feagan BG, McDonald JWD, Panaccione R, Enns RA, Bernstein CN, Ponich TP et al. Methotrexate in combination with infliximab is no more effective than infliximab alone in patients with Crohn’s disease. Gastroenterology. 2014;146:681-688.e1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kappelman MD, Wohl DA, Herfarth HH, Firestine AM, Adler J, Ammoury RF et al. Comparative effectiveness of anti-TNF in combination with low-dose methotrexate vs anti-TNF monotherapy in pediatric Crohn’s disease: a pragmatic randomized trial. Gastroenterology. 2023;165:149-161.e7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Yang E, Panaccione N, Whitmire N, Dulai PS, Vande Casteele N, Singh S et al. Efficacy and safety of simultaneous treatment with two biologic medications in refractory Crohn’s disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2020;51:1031–1038.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Ahmed W, Galati J, Kumar A, Christos PJ, Longman R, Lukin DJ et al. Dual biologic or small molecule therapy for treatment of inflammatory bowel disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022;20:e361–e379.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Moon JS. Clinical aspects and treatments for pediatric inflammatory bowel diseases. Pediatr Gastroenterol Hepatol Nutr. 2019;22:50.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Rosen MJ, Dhawan A, Saeed SA. Inflammatory bowel disease in children and adolescents. JAMA Pediatr. 2015;169:1053.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Olbjørn C, Rove JB, Jahnsen J. Combination of biological agents in moderate to severe pediatric inflammatory bowel disease: a case series and review of the literature. Pediatric Drugs. 2020;22:409–416.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Dolinger MT, Spencer EA, Lai J, Dunkin D, Dubinsky MC. Dual biologic and small molecule therapy for the treatment of refractory pediatric inflammatory bowel disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2021;27:1210–1214.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Wlazło M, Meglicka M, Wiernicka A, Osiecki M, Kierkuś J. Dual biologic therapy in moderate to severe pediatric inflammatory bowel disease: a retrospective study. Children. 2022;10:11.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Yerushalmy-Feler A, Olbjorn C, Kolho K-L, Aloi M, Musto F, Martin-de-Carpi J et al. Dual biologic or small molecule therapy in refractory pediatric inflammatory bowel disease (DOUBLE-PIBD): a multicenter study from the Pediatric IBD Porto Group of ESPGHAN. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1093/ibd/izad064.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Harvey RF, Bradshaw JM. A simple index of Crohn’s-disease activity. Lancet. 1980;1:514.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Schroeder KW, Tremaine WJ, Ilstrup DM. Coated oral 5-aminosalicylic acid therapy for mildly to moderately active ulcerative colitis. N Engl J Med. 1987;317:1625–1629.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Yu A, Ha NB, Shi B, Cheng Y-W, Mahadevan U, Beck KR. Real-world experience with tofacitinib dose de-escalation in patients with moderate and severe ulcerative colitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023;21:3115-3124.e3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Wetwittayakhlang P, Lakatos PL. Current evidence for combined targeted therapy for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease. J Can Assoc Gastroenterol. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcag/gwad032.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Spencer EA, Bergstein S, Dolinger M, Pittman N, Kellar A, Dunkin D et al. Single-center experience with upadacitinib for adolescents with refractory inflammatory bowel disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1093/ibd/izad300.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

AK: conducted the study, collected and interpreted the data, and drafted the manuscript; MTD: collected the data and edited the manuscript; EAS: collected the data and edited the manuscript; MCD: conceptualized and planned the study, interpreted the data, and reviewed and edited the manuscript. Each author has approved the final draft of the manuscript submitted.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amelia Kellar.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Michael T. Dolinger: Consulting fees from Neurologica, a subsidiary of Samsung electronics co., ltd, Pfizer, and BMS. Marla C. Dubinsky: Consulting fees from Abbvie, Abivax, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Geneoscopy, Janssen, Lilly, Merck, Pfizer, Prometheus Biosciences, Prometheus Labs, Takeda. Amelia Kellar: Nothing to disclose. Elizabeth A. Spencer: Nothing to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kellar, A., Dolinger, M.T., Spencer, E.A. et al. Real-World Outcomes of Dual Advanced Therapy in Children and Young Adults with Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Dig Dis Sci (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-024-08379-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-024-08379-9

Keywords

Navigation