Skip to main content
Log in

Bird Population Dynamics during the Regenerative Succession of Mossy Pine Woodland in Southwestern Belarus

  • Published:
Biology Bulletin Reviews Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Disturbed forest ecosystems are characterized by significant spatial and temporal changes. As a part of the study on bird communities, changes in bird abundance during the secondary succession of a cleared mossy pine woodland in southwestern Belarus were investigated. The purpose of the work was to determine the interannual dynamics of bird species abundance and to assess the variability of individual species abundance during the secondary succession of the mossy pine woodland. The material was collected in 2000–2019. Line transects were set to conduct bird counts in ecosystems at different stages of succession. For the data processing, generally accepted methods of statistical analysis were used. The species diversity of birds was found to increase from 8 to 42 species; the overall abundance increased from 171.7 to 587.1 birds/km2 during the succession (six stages, from 1 to 90 years in age). The abundance of species (birds/km2) and interannual variability during 11 seasons were determined. The coefficient of variation (CV) was the highest (71.00–82.50%) for species whose abundance did not exceed 1.0 birds/km2. The average abundance of species varied considerably, e.g., among passerines at the stage of 80–90 years old from 1.1 birds/km2 (Red-breasted Flycatcher) to 153.7 birds/km2 (Common Chaffinch). Bird populations with high abundance turned out to be the most stable; for example, at the last two successional stages, the CV of the Common Chaffinch is 6.02 and 7.16%. For species with average abundance, the variability is found to be low or medium (varies from 11.90 to 36.20%); for species with low abundance, the CV varies from 17.68 to 82.50%. All six stages of succession were dominated by nesting migratory birds, which account for 75.0% of the species in the first stage of succession to 52.4% in the fifth and sixth stages. Near and distant migrants form the basis of the bird community at all stages. Populations of sedentary species and distant migrants are more stable than those of near migrants.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.

REFERENCES

  1. Abramova, I., Changes in bird communities throughout secondary bilberry pine forest succession in south-western Belarus, in Modern Problems and Solutions in Environmental Protection–2021 Post-Conference Monograph, Białymstok: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu w Białymstoku, 2021, pp. 163–178.

  2. Abramova, I.V., Struktura i dinamika naseleniya ptits ekosistem yugo-zapada Belarusi (Structure and Dynamics of Bird Populations in Ecosystems of Southwestern Belarus), Brest: Brest. Gos. Univ., 2007.

  3. Abramova, I.V., Succession of bird populations during the restorative change of spruce forests in the southwestern part of Belarus, Zh. Beloruss. Gos. Univ., Geogr., Geol., 2017, no. 2, pp. 31–39.

  4. Abramova, I.V., Dynamics of bird species abundance during the succession of oak forests in southwestern Belarus, Zool. Zh., 2022, vol. 101, no. 11, pp. 1232–1242.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Akresh, M.E., King, D.I., and Brooks, R.T., Demographic response of a shrubland bird to habitat creation, succession, and disturbance in a dynamic landscape, For. Ecol. Manage., 2015, vol. 336, pp. 72–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Annand, E.M. and Thompson, F.R., Forest bird response to regeneration practices in central hardwood forests, J. Wildl. Manage., 1997, vol. 61, pp. 159–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bibby, C., Jones, M., and Marsden, S., Metody polevykh ekspeditsionnykh issledovanii. Issledovaniya i uchety ptits (Methods of Field Expedition Research. Studies and Bird Surveys), Moscow: Soyuz Okhrany Ptits Rossii, 2000.

  8. Boguiskii, Z. and Bednorz, J., Secondary succession of bird communities nesting in dry pine forests in Poland, in XVIII Mezhdunarodnyi ornitologicheskii kongress: tezisy dokladov (Proc. XVIII Int. Ornithol. Congr.), Moscow: Nauka, 1982, pp. 134–135.

  9. Burskii, O.V., Structure of population and dynamics of passerine birds in Central Siberia, Extended Abstract of Doctoral (Biol.) Dissertation, Moscow: A.N. Severtsov Institute of Ecology and Evolution, 2009.

  10. Clements, J.F., Schulenberg, T.S., Iliff, M.J., Fredericks, T.A., Gerbracht, J.A., et al., The eBird/Clements checklist of Birds of the World: v2022, 2022. https://www.birds.cornell.edu/clementschecklist/download/.

  11. Danilov, N.N., Changes in the avifauna of overgrown felled areas in the Middle Urals, Zool. Zh., 1958, vol. 37, no. 12, pp. 1898–1903.

    Google Scholar 

  12. DeGraaf, R.M. and Yamasaki, M., Options for managing early-successional forest and shrubland bird habitats in the northeastern United States, For. Ecol. Manage., 2003, vol. 185, nos. 1–2, pp. 179–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Dolbik, M.S., Landshaftnaya struktura ornitofauny Belarusi (Landscape Structure of the Ornithofauna of Belarus), Minsk: Nauka i Tekhnika, 1974.

  14. European Birds of Conservation Concern: Populations, Trends and National Responsibilities, Cambridge: BirdLife International, 2017.

  15. Freedman, B. and Johnson, G., Selected studies of forestry and bird communities in Nova Scotia and New Brunswick, in Biology and Conservation of Forest Birds, Fredericton: Society of Canadian Ornithologists, 1999, pp. 65–72.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Głowaciński, Z., Succession of bird communities in the Niepolomice Forest (Southern Poland), Ecol. Pol., 1975, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 231–263.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Głowaciński, Z., Some ecological parameters of avian communities in the succession series of a cultivated pine forest, Bull. Acad. Pol. Sci., 1979, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 169–177.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Głowaciński, Z., Stability in bird communities during the secondary succession of a forest ecosystem, Ecol. Pol., 1981, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 73–95.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Gosudarstvennyi lesnoi kadastr Respubliki Belarus’ po sostoyaniyu na 01.01.2021 g. (State Forest Cadastre of the Republic of Belarus as of January 1, 2021), Minsk: Belgosles, 2021.

  20. Gridneva, V.V. and Mel’nikov, V.N., Dynamics of bird populations during successional changes after different types of logging in the Eastern Upper Volga region, Vestn. Tambov. Gos. Univ., 2013, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 3227–3230.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Haapanen, A., Bird fauna of the Finnish forests in relation to forest succession: I, Ann. Zool. Fenn., 1965, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 153–196.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Haapanen, A., Bird fauna of the Finnish forests in relation to forest succession: II, Ann. Zool. Fenn., 1966, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 176–200.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Helle, P., Habitat selection of breeding birds in relation to forest succession in Northeastern Finland, Ornis Fenn., 1985, vol. 62, pp. 113–123.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Helle, P. and Mőnkkőnen, M., Annual fluctuations of land bird communities in different successional stages of boreal forest, Ann. Zool. Fenn., 1986, vol. 23, pp. 269–280.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Holmes, R.T. and Sherry, T.W., Thirty-year bird population trends in an unfragmented temperate deciduous forest: Importance of habitat change, Auk, 2001, vol. 118, no. 3, pp. 589–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Inozemtsev, A.A., Ptitsy i les (Birds and Forest), Moscow: Agropromizdat, 1987.

  27. Järvinen, O., Geographical gradients of stability in European land bird communities, Oecologia, 1979, vol. 38, pp. 51–69.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Järvinen, O. and Väisänen, R., Finnish line transect censuses, Ornis Fenn., 1976, vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 115–118.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Johnson, D.V. and Odum, E.P., Breeding bird populations in relation to plant succession on the piedmont of Georgia, Ecology, 1956, vol. 37, pp. 50–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Krasnaya kniga Respubliki Belarus’. Zhivotnye (Red Book of the Republic of Belarus. Animals), Minsk: Belaruskaia Entsyklopedyia, 2015.

  31. Kuzyakin, A.P., Zoogeography of the USSR, Uch. Zap. Mosk. Obl. Pedagog. Inst. im. N.K. Krupskoi, Biogeogr., 1962, vol. 109, no. 1, pp. 3–182.

  32. Labokha, K.V., Luferov, A.O., and Karas’, A.N., The current state of pine forests in Belarus, Tr. Beloruss. Gos. Univ., Ser. 1, 2020, no. 1, pp. 28–38.

  33. Lovchii, N.F., Kadastr Tipov sosnovykh lesov Belorusskogo Poles’ya (Cadastre of Pine Forests Types in the Belarusian Polesie), Minsk: Belarus. Navuka, 2012.

  34. Odum E.P., Fundamentals of Ecology, Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Company, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Perry, R.W., Jenkins, J.M.A., Thill, R.E., and Thompson, F.R., Long-term effects of different forest regeneration methods on mature forest birds, For. Ecol. Manage., 2018, vol. 408, pp. 183–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Preobrazhenskaya, E.S., Ekologiya vorob’inykh ptits Privetluzh’ya (Ecology of Passerine Birds in Privetluzhye), Moscow: KMK, 1998.

  37. Preobrazhenskaya, E.S. and Borisov, B.I., Changes in bird populations during the overgrowth of various types of felled areas in Privetluzhye, in Vliyanie antropogennoi transformatsii landshafta na naselenie nazemnykh pozvonochnykh zhivotnykh: Tezisy Vsesoyuznogo Soveshchaniya (Influence of Anthropogenic Landscape Transformation on the Population of Terrestrial Vertebrates: Proc. All-Union Meeting), Moscow, 1987, part 2, pp. 157–158.

  38. Ravkin, E.S., Byshnev, I.I., Kachanov, S.K., Ravkin, Y.S., Anufriev, V.M., et al., Spatial diversity of the summer bird population of the East European and West Siberian plains, in Dostizheniya i problemy ornitologii Severnoi Evrazii na rubezhe vekov: Trudy mezhdunarodnoi konferentsii “Aktual’nye problemy izucheniya i okhrany ptits Vostochnoi Evropy i Severnoi Azii” (Achievements and Issues of Ornithology in Northern Eurasia at the Turn of the Centuries: Proc. Int. Conf. “Current Issues of Study and Protection of Birds in Eastern Europe and Northern Asia”), Kazan: Novoe Znanie, 2001, pp. 212–236.

  39. Ravkin, Y.S., On the methodology of bird accounting in forest landscapes, in Priroda ochagov kleshchevogo entsefalita na Altae (Nature of Tick-Borne Encephalitis Foci in Altai), Novosibirsk: Nauka, 1967, pp. 66–75.

  40. Ravkin, Y.S., Prostranstvennaya organizatsiya naseleniya ptits lesnoi zony (Spatial Organization of the Bird Population in the Forest Zone), Novosibirsk: Nauka, 1984.

  41. Schlossberg, S. and King, D.I., Postlogging succession and habitat usage of shrubland birds, J. Wildl. Manage., 2009, vol. 73, no. 2, pp. 226–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Shchegolev, V.I., Quantitative accounting of birds in the forest zone, in Metodiki issledovaniya produktivnosti i struktury vidov ptits v predelakh ikh arealov (Methods for Studying the Productivity and Structure of Bird Species within Their Ranges), Vilnius: Mokslas, 1977, pp. 95–102.

  43. Southwood, T.R.E., Brown, V.K., Reader, P.M., and Green, E.E., The use of different stages of a secondary succession by birds, Bird Study, 1986, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 159–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Vladyshevskii, D.V., Ekologiya lesnykh ptits i zverei (Kormodobycha i ee biotsenoticheskoe znachenie) (Ecology of Forest Birds and Animals (Foraging and Its Biocenotic Significance)), Novosibirsk: Nauka, 1980.

  45. Yurkevich, I.D., Golod, D.S., and Aderikho, V.S., Rastitelnost’ Belarusi i ee kartografirovanie, okhrana i ispol’zovanie (Vegetation of Belarus and Its Mapping, Protection, and Use), Minsk: Nauka i Tekhnika, 1979.

Download references

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Zoologist V.E. Gaiduk assisted in collecting materials for this work, for which the author expresses his sincere gratitude to him.

Funding

This work was supported by ongoing institutional funding. No additional grants to carry out or direct this particular research were obtained.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to I. V. Abramova.

Ethics declarations

ETHICS APPROVAL AND CONSENT TO PARTICIPATE

This work does not contain any studies involving humans and animal subjects.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The author of this work declares that she has no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note.

Pleiades Publishing remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Abramova, I.V. Bird Population Dynamics during the Regenerative Succession of Mossy Pine Woodland in Southwestern Belarus. Biol Bull Rev 14, 102–114 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1134/S207908642401002X

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S207908642401002X

Navigation