Abstract
Spartina anglica, an invasive marsh grass, was designated as a harmful marine organism in 2016 due to its ability to stabilize mudflats and reduce macrobenthic diversity. To control such invasive species, physical, chemical, or biological methods can be applied while chemical methods are prohibited by law due to ecological disruption. However, the preferred methods of soil tillage, cutting, and native plant restoration for managing S. anglica have rarely been analyzed. To compare the methods, we performed 9 treatments with four replicates, comprising control, different frequencies of clipping (once and twice) and tilling (once and twice), and different densities (50 and 100 seedling) of restoration of the native plants Suaeda japonica and Phragmites australis. To evaluate the severity of disturbance, we measured coverage, stem density, average plant height, and above-ground biomass for 2 years. We found P. australis and S. japonica did not successfully establish or survive due to niche differences and the inherent biological features of Spartina. However, physical removal had a stronger effect than interspecific interaction. Two cutting treatments in the early and the late growing season reduced plant height and biomass of S. anglica by 6 and 34%, respectively, compared with the control treatment at the rapid vegetative growth stage in the following year. We also found that two tillage treatments reduced biomass, plant cover, and stem density by 32%, 38%, and 83%, respectively, in the following year. In the study site, managing invasive species such as S. anglica is best achieved by physically destroying the plant using soil tillage while attempting to restore native species had marginal control effects.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Dataset was shared in the open access file directories of Figshare. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.25241488.v1
References
An SU, Cho H, Jung UJ et al (2020) Invasive Spartina anglica greatly alters the rates and pathways of organic carbon oxidation and associated microbial communities in an intertidal wetland of the Han river estuary. Yellow Sea Front Mar Sci 7:59. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2020.00059
Aschehoug ET, Brooker R, Atwater DZ et al (2016) The mechanisms and consequences of interspecific competition among plants. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 47:263–281. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-121415-032123
Bezabih Beyene B, Li J, Yuan J et al (2022) Non-native plant invasion can accelerate global climate change by increasing wetland methane and terrestrial nitrous oxide emissions. Glob Change Biol 28:5453–5468. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.16290
Bolker BM, Brooks ME, Clark CJ et al (2009) Generalized linear mixed models: a practical guide for ecology and evolution. Trends in ecology & evolution 24(3):127–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2008.10.008
Byun C, de Blois S, Brisson J (2018) Management of invasive plants through ecological resistance. Biol Invasions 20:13–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-017-1529-7
Byun C, Oh M, Lee EJ, Kang H (2020) Seed density is as important as limiting similarity, diversity effect, and propagule pressure in plant restoration to control invasion. Ecol Eng 144:105712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2019.105712
Byun C, Jeong Y, Hong SH (2022) Synergistic effects of soil nutrient level and native species identity and diversity on biotic resistance to Sicyos angulatus, an invasive species. Oecologia 200:221–230. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-022-05265-x
Chambers RM, Mozdzer TJ, Ambrose JC (1998) Effects of salinity and sulfide on the distribution of Phragmites australis and Spartina alterniflora in a tidal saltmarsh. Aquat Bot 62:161–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3770(98)00095-3
Cipollini DF, Bergelson J (2002) Interspecific competition affects growth and herbivore damage of Brassica napus in the field. Springer 162:227–231. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020377627529
Connell JH, Tracey JG, Webb LJ (1984) Compensatory recruitment, growth, and mortality as factors maintaining rain forest tree diversity. Ecol Monogr 54:141–164. https://doi.org/10.2307/1942659
Dethier MN, Hacker SD (2004) Improving management practices for invasive cordgrass in the Pacific Northwest: a case study of “Spartina anglica”. Sea Grant Washington
Frid C, Chandrasekara WU, Davey P (1999) The restoration of mud flats invaded by common cord-grass (Spartina anglica, CE Hubbard) using mechanical disturbance and its effects on the macrobenthic fauna. Aquat Conserv Mar Freshw Ecosyst 9:47–61
Gao Y, Tang L, Wang J et al (2009) Clipping at early florescence is more efficient for controlling the invasive plant Spartina alterniflora. Ecol Res 24:1033–1041. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11284-008-0577-y
Gratton C, Denno RF (2005) Restoration of arthropod assemblages in a Spartina salt marsh following removal of the invasive Plant Phragmites australis. Restor Ecol 13:358–372. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-100X.2005.00045.x
Gustafsson C (2004) The effect of timing and amount of leaf removal on survival, growth and reproduction in the perennial herb Sanicula europaea L. Plant Ecol 170:29–34. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:VEGE.0000019024.91821.bc
Hacker SD, Heimer D, Hellquist CE, Reeder TG, Reeves B, Riordan TJ, Dethier MN (2001) A marine plant (Spartina anglica) invades widely varying habitats: potential mechanisms of invasion and control. Biol Invasions 3:211–217
Hammond MER, Cooper A (2002) Spartina anglica eradication and intertidal recovery in Northern Ireland estuaries. In: Veitch D, Clout M (eds) Turning the tide: the eradication of invasive species. IUCN SSC Invasive Species Specialist Group IUCN, Gland, pp 124–131
Hedge P, Kriwoken L, Patten K (2003) A review of Spartina management in Washington state, US. J Aquat Plant Manag 41:82–90
Howes BL, Dacey JWH, Goehringer DD (1986) Factors controlling the growth form of Spartina alterniflora: feedbacks between above-ground production, sediment oxidation. Nitrogen Salinity J Ecol 74:881. https://doi.org/10.2307/2260404
Jiang L-F, Luo Y-Q, Chen J-K, Li B (2009) Ecophysiological characteristics of invasive Spartina alterniflora and native species in salt marshes of Yangtze River estuary, China. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 81:74–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2008.09.018
Kerr DW, Hogle IB, Ort BS, Thornton WJ (2016) A review of 15 years of Spartina management in the San Francisco Estuary. Biol Invasions 18:2247–2266. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-016-1178-2
Kim J, Chaudhary DR, Lee J et al (2020a) Microbial mechanism for enhanced methane emission in deep soil layer of Phragmites-introduced tidal marsh. Environ Int 134:105251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2019.105251
Kim J, Lee J, Yun J et al (2020b) Mechanisms of enhanced methane emission due to introduction of Spartina anglica and Phragmites australis in a temperate tidal salt marsh. Ecol Eng 153:105905. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2020.105905
Kim J, Heo YM, Yun J et al (2022) Changes in archaeal community and activity by the invasion of Spartina anglica along soil depth profiles of a coastal wetland. Microb Ecol 83:436–446. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-021-01770-3
Kim S, Hong JS, Kim DW (2019) Efective initiation difusion model based on data of patches growing in smooth cordgrass Spartina alternifora. In: The fourth Asian mar biol symposium. Taiwan
Li H, Zhang L (2008) An experimental study on physical controls of an exotic plant Spartina alterniflora in Shanghai, China. Ecol Eng 32:11–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2007.08.005
Liu H, Lin Z, Qi X et al (2014) The relative importance of sexual and asexual reproduction in the spread of Spartina alterniflora using a spatially explicit individual-based model. Ecol Res 29:905–915. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11284-014-1181-y
Mangla S, Sheley RL, James JJ, Radosevich SR (2011) Intra and interspecific competition among invasive and native species during early stages of plant growth. Plant Ecol 212:531–542. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-011-9909-z
Medeiros DL, White DS, Howes BL (2013) Replacement of Phragmites australis by Spartina alterniflora: the role of competition and salinity. Wetlands 33:421–430. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-013-0400-6
Park S, Kim JH, Lee EJ (2022) Resistance of plant communities to invasion by tall fescue: an experimental study combining species diversity, functional traits and nutrient levels. Basic Appl Ecol 58:39–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.baae.2021.12.002
Peng HB, Shi J, Gan X, Zhang J, Ma C, Piersma T, Melville DS (2022) Efficient removal of Spartina alterniflora with low negative environmental impacts using imazapyr. Front Mar Sci 9:1054402. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2022.1054402
Qiao P, Wang A, Xie B, Wang L, Han G, Mei B, Zhang X (2019) Effects of herbicides on invasive Spartina alterniflora in the yellow river delta. Acta Ecol Sin 39:5627–5634
Roberts PD, Pullin AS (2006) The effectiveness of management options used for the control of Spartina species. CEE Review, 06-001. www.environmentalevidence.org/SR22.html.
Schutz AEN, Bond WJ, Cramer MD (2011) Defoliation depletes the carbohydrate reserves of resprouting Acacia saplings in an African savanna. Plant Ecol 212:2047–2055. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-010-9883-x
Shin W, Oh M, Hong JS et al (2022) Early invasion of common cordgrass (Spartina anglica) increases belowground biomass and decreases macrofaunal density and diversity in a tidal flat marsh. Biol Invasions 24:3615–3629. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-022-02866-8
Strong DR, Ayres DA (2016) Control and consequences of Spartina spp. invasions with focus upon San Francisco Bay. Biol Invasions 18:2237–2246. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-015-0980-6
Tang L, Gao Y, Wang J et al (2009) Designing an effective clipping regime for controlling the invasive plant Spartina alterniflora in an estuarine salt marsh. Ecol Eng 35:874–881. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2008.12.016
Tang L, Gao Y, Wang C et al (2010) How tidal regime and treatment timing influence the clipping frequency for controlling invasive Spartina alterniflora: implications for reducing management costs. Biol Invasions 12:593–601. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-009-9465-9
Tang L, Zhou QS, Guo W et al (2021) Importance of high severity in a physical removal treatment for controlling invasive Spartina alterniflora. Ecol Eng 171:106375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2021.106375
Tarsa EE, Holdaway BM, Kettenring KM (2022) Tipping the balance: the role of seed density, abiotic filters, and priority effects in seed-based wetland restoration. Ecol Appl. https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.2706
van Kleunen M, Dawson W, Essl F et al (2015) Global exchange and accumulation of non-native plants. Nature 525:100–103. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14910
Venter ZS, Hawkins H-J, Cramer MD (2021) Does defoliation frequency and severity influence plant productivity? The role of grazing management and soil nutrients. African J Range Forage Sci 38:141–156. https://doi.org/10.2989/10220119.2020.1766565
Weidlich EWA, Flórido FG, Sorrini TB, Brancalion PHS (2020) Controlling invasive plant species in ecological restoration: a global review. J Appl Ecol 57:1806–1817. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.13656
Xiao Y, Tang J, Qing H et al (2010) Clonal integration enhances flood tolerance of Spartina alterniflora daughter ramets. Aquat Bot 92:9–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquabot.2009.09.001
Xie B, Han G, Qiao P et al (2019) Effects of mechanical and chemical control on invasive Spartina alterniflora in the yellow river delta. China Peerj 7:e7655. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.7655
Yuan J, Ding W, Liu D et al (2015) Exotic Spartina alterniflora invasion alters ecosystem-atmosphere exchange of CH4 and N2O and carbon sequestration in a coastal salt marsh in China. Glob Change Biol 21:1567–1580. https://doi.org/10.1111/GCB.12797
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to Yonghwan Kim, Yangheyon Lee, Jihwan Kim, and Jangho Lee for their help during the sampling collection. We also feel thankful for three anonymous reviewers for their valuable inputs.
Funding
This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIT) (2022R1A2C1003504). This study was supported by a joint research project from the Ministry of Environment, Republic of Korea (Project Number: 2021002270004). This work is financially supported by Korea Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport (MOLIT) as Innovative Talent Education Program for Smart City. Wonhyeop Shin is grateful for financial support from Hyundai Motor Chung Mong-Koo Foundation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
WS Conceptualization, investigation, Data curation, Writing—original draft. JK Investigation, Resources, Data curation, Writing—original draft. YS Conceptualization, Validation. HK Conceptualization, Validation. CB Conceptualization, Methodology, Investigation, Data analysis, Validation, Formal analysis, Writing—original draft.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Ethical approval
This study follows the guidelines declared in Article 24, Act On The Conservation And Use Of Biological Diversity, Ministry of Environment and was approved by Korea Marine Environment Management Corporation.
Consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Shin, W., Kim, J., Song, Y. et al. Soil tillage effect on the control of invasive Spartina anglica in a coastal wetland. Wetlands Ecol Manage (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11273-024-09983-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11273-024-09983-2