skip to main content
research-article
Free Access
Just Accepted

Faculty, Student, and Community Partner Experiences in Computer and Information Science Service Learning

Online AM:27 March 2024Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Service learning, a high impact pedagogy, involves integrating academic outcomes with service to the community. The success of service learning experiences depends on the development of mutually reciprocal relationships between students, instructors, and community partners, ensuring equitable benefits for all stakeholders. To explore how relationship-building and growth are supported in computer and information science (CIS) service learning, we conducted semi-structured interviews with 13 informants—each a faculty, student, or community partner who participated in one of 5 computer or information science service learning courses. Our analysis identified three factors that were most crucial in supporting the formation of relationships among stakeholders: infrastructuring the relationship, valuing technical and other expertise equitably, and integrating soft skills and technical skills. Based on these findings, we discuss how growth, an important outcome of relationship-building and equitable service learning experiences, can be supported and assessed in CIS service learning experiences.

References

  1. ABET Computing Accreditation Commission. 2016. 2017-2018 Criteria for Accrediting Computing Programs, 2017-2018 | ABET. Technical Report. ABET, Baltimore, MD. https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting-computing-programs-2017-2018/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Hend Al-khalifa. 2010. Overcoming gender segregation in service learning projects: a case from Saudi Arabia. In Proceedings of the 2010 ACM conference on Information technology education (SIGITE ’10). Association for Computing Machinery, Midland, Michigan, USA, 121–124. https://doi.org/10.1145/1867651.1867683Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Ruth E Anderson, Gaetano Borriello, Hélène Martin, and Leonard Black. 2009. Capstone projects as community connectors. Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges 25, 1 (2009), 116–122.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Richard J. Anderson, Ruth E. Anderson, Gaetano Borriello, and Joyojeet Pal. 2010. An approach to integrating ICTD projects into an undergraduate curriculum. In Proceedings of the 41st ACM technical symposium on Computer science education (SIGCSE ’10). Association for Computing Machinery, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA, 529–533. https://doi.org/10.1145/1734263.1734440Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Lecia Barker, Christopher Lynnly Hovey, and Leisa D Thompson. 2014. Results of a large-scale, multi-institutional study of undergraduate retention in computing. In 2014 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) Proceedings. IEEE, 1–8.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Stephanie Hayne Beatty, Ken N Meadows, Richard SwamiNathan, and Catherine Mulvihill. 2016. The effects of an alternative spring break program on student development. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement 20, 3 (2016), 90–119.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Deborah Becker and Connie Hecker. 2011. Student engagement through applied learning: the “live” business partnership model. Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges 26, 5 (May 2011), 275–282.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Elaine Bennett. 2018. A simple, practical framework for organizing relationship-based reciprocity in service-learning experiences: insights from anthropology. International Journal of Research on Service-Learning and Community Engagement 6, 1 (2018), 1–15.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Aaron Bloomfield, Mark Sherriff, and Kara Williams. 2014. A service learning practicum capstone. In Proceedings of the 45th ACM technical symposium on Computer science education (SIGCSE ’14). Association for Computing Machinery, Atlanta, Georgia, USA, 265–270. https://doi.org/10.1145/2538862.2538974Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Chris Bopp, Ellie Harmon, and Amy Voida. 2017. Disempowered by Data: Nonprofits, Social Enterprises, and the Consequences of Data-Driven Work. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 3608–3619. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025694Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Robert C Bringle, Patti Clayton, and Mary Price. 2012. Partnerships in service learning and civic engagement. Partnerships: A Journal of Service-Learning and Civic Engagement 1, 1 (2012).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Bo Brinkman and Amanda Diekman. 2016. Applying the Communal Goal Congruity Perspective to Enhance Diversity and Inclusion in Undergraduate Computing Degrees. In Proceedings of the 47th ACM Technical Symposium on Computing Science Education (SIGCSE ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, Memphis, Tennessee, USA, 102–107. https://doi.org/10.1145/2839509.2844562Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Christopher H. Brooks. 2008. Community connections: lessons learned developing and maintaining a computer science service-learning program. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin 40, 1 (March 2008), 352–356. https://doi.org/10.1145/1352322.1352256Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Richard Burns, Wanda Eugene, Tiffany Barnes, Stephen Chandler, Megan Harwell, and Osarieme Omokaro. 2014. Reflections from a computational service learning trip to Haiti. Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges 29, 3 (Jan. 2014), 43–50.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Richard Burns, Terry Harvey, and Lori Pollock. 2012. An experience report on cross-semester student critique and action in an integrated software engineering, service learning course. In Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Software Engineering Education Based on Real-World Experiences (EduRex ’12). IEEE Press, Zurich, Switzerland, 21–24.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Richard Burns, Lori Pollock, and Terry Harvey. 2012. Integrating hard and soft skills: software engineers serving middle school teachers. In Proceedings of the 43rd ACM technical symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE ’12). Association for Computing Machinery, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA, 209–214. https://doi.org/10.1145/2157136.2157199Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Brenda K. Bushouse. 2005. Community Nonprofit Organizations and Service-Learning: Resource Constraints to Building Partnerships with Universities. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning 12, 1 (2005), 32–40. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ848483Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Brenda K Bushouse. 2005. Community nonprofit organizations and service-learning: Resource constraints to building partnerships with universities. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning 12, 1 (2005), 32–40.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Christine I Celio, Joseph Durlak, and Allison Dymnicki. 2011. A meta-analysis of the impact of service-learning on students. Journal of experiential education 34, 2 (2011), 164–181.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Louise Chaytor. 2003. Urban empowerment: a successful example of service learning. In Proceedings of the 4th conference on Information technology curriculum (CITC4 ’03). Association for Computing Machinery, Lafayette, Indiana, USA, 226–230. https://doi.org/10.1145/947121.947171Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Steve Chen, Janet McCoy, Louis Cooper, and Tyler Lambert. 2015. Faculty members’ perception of service-learning courses in curriculum. International Journal of Education and Human Developments 1, 3 (2015), 9–19.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Juliet Choo, Yew Kong Tan, Faith Ong, Shiuan Shiuan Tiong, Sangeeta Nair, Jean Ong, and Angel Chan. 2019. What Works in Service-Learning?: Achieving Civic Outcomes, Academic Connection, Career Preparation, and Personal Growth in Students at Ngee Ann Polytechnic. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning 25, 2 (2019), 95–132.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Jörn Christiansson, Erik Grönvall, and Signe Louise Yndigegn. 2018. Teaching participatory design using live projects: critical reflections and lessons learnt. In Proceedings of the 15th Participatory Design Conference: Full Papers - Volume 1 (PDC ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, Hasselt and Genk, Belgium, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1145/3210586.3210597Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Patti H Clayton, Robert G Bringle, and Julie A Hatcher. 2013. Research on service learning: Conceptual frameworks and assessment: Communities, institutions, and partnerships. Vol. 2. Stylus Publishing, LLC.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Patti H Clayton, Robert G Bringle, Bryanne Senor, Jenny Huq, and Mary Morrison. 2010. Differentiating and assessing relationships in service-learning and civic engagement: Exploitative, transactional, or transformational. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning 16, 2 (2010), 5–21.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Randy W. Connolly. 2012. Is There Service in Computing Service Learning?. In Proceedings of the 43rd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE ’12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 337–342. https://doi.org/10.1145/2157136.2157238Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Juliet M. Corbin and Anselm L. Strauss. 2015. Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (fourth edition ed.). SAGE, Thousand Oaks, California. OCLC: 898334340.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Julian Thomas Costa. 2017. Service Learning, Project Management and Professional Development. Business Education Innovation Journal 9, 2 (2017), 32–38. http://eds.a.ebscohost.com.colorado.idm.oclc.org/abstract?site=eds&scope=site&jrnl=19450915&AN=128049197&h=AObtjVl9Oa6keiI4aaMSWz5Lp02YmbUi0NXNgXR5PgJ5FYAmgFYhkVx5bzXTa%2bhLo49Md4A%2b1Gv3oqhW28OmdQ%3d%3d&crl=c&resultLocal=ErrCrlNoResults&resultNs=Ehost&crlhashurl=login.aspx%3fdirect%3dtrue%26profile%3dehost%26scope%3dsite%26authtype%3dcrawler%26jrnl%3d19450915%26AN%3d128049197Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Teresa Dahlberg, Tiffany Barnes, Kim Buch, and Karen Bean. 2010. Applying service learning to computer science: attracting and engaging under-represented students. Computer Science Education 20, 3 (Sept. 2010), 169–180. https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2010.492164Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Teresa Dahlberg, Tiffany Barnes, Kim Buch, and Audrey Rorrer. 2011. The STARS Alliance: Viable Strategies for Broadening Participation in Computing. ACM Transactions on Computing Education 11, 3 (Oct. 2011), 18:1–18:25. https://doi.org/10.1145/2037276.2037282Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Melissa J. Dark. 2004. Civic Responsibility and Information Security: An Information Security Management, Service Learning Course. In Proceedings of the 1st Annual Conference on Information Security Curriculum Development (InfoSecCD ’04). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 15–19. https://doi.org/10.1145/1059524.1059528Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Sonal Dekhane, Xin Xu, Nannette Napier, Rahaf Barakat, Cengiz Gunay, and Kristine Nagel. 2018. Technology focused service-learning course to increase confidence and persistence in computing. Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges 34, 2 (Dec. 2018), 147–153.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Amanda B Diekman, Elizabeth R Brown, Amanda M Johnston, and Emily K Clark. 2010. Seeking congruity between goals and roles: A new look at why women opt out of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics careers. Psychological science 21, 8 (2010), 1051–1057.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Zachary Dodds and Leslie Karp. 2006. The evolution of a computational outreach program to secondary school students. https://doi.org/10.1145/1124706.1121479Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Linda Plitt Donaldson and Laura Daughtery. 2011. Introducing asset-based models of social justice into service learning: A social work approach. Journal of Community Practice 19, 1 (2011), 80–99.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Marianne Dunn, Margo Gregor, Simone Robinson, Anthony Ferrer, Devynn Campbell-Halfaker, and Javier Martin-Fernandez. 2022. Academia during the time of COVID-19: Examining the voices of untenured female professors in STEM. Journal of Career Assessment (2022), 10690727211057441.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Beth Eschenfelder. 2012. Exploring the nature of nonprofit work through emotional labor. Management Communication Quarterly 26, 1 (2012), 173–178.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. Casey Fiesler, Natalie Garrett, and Nathan Beard. 2020. What Do We Teach When We Teach Tech Ethics? A Syllabi Analysis. In Proceedings of the 51st ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (Portland, OR, USA) (SIGCSE ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 289–295. https://doi.org/10.1145/3328778.3366825Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Alexandra Funke, Marc Berges, and Peter Hubwieser. 2016. Different Perceptions of Computer Science. In 2016 International Conference on Learning and Teaching in Computing and Engineering (LaTICE). 14–18. https://doi.org/10.1109/LaTiCE.2016.1Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. Andrew Furco. 1996. Service-learning: A balanced approach to experiential education. (1996).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Barney Glaser and Anselm Strauss. 2017. Discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Routledge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Barbara J Grosz, David Gray Grant, Kate Vredenburgh, Jeff Behrends, Lily Hu, Alison Simmons, and Jim Waldo. 2019. Embedded EthiCS: integrating ethics across CS education. Commun. ACM 62, 8 (2019), 54–61.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. A Harrell, S Lentz, F Robledo, A Voida, and L Barker. 2024. Putting the service into service learning: A report on a survey of CIS faculty. To appear in Proceedings of the SIGCSE Technical Symposium. (2024).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Shelly Schaefer Hinck and Mary Ellen Brandell. 2000. The relationship between institutional support and campus acceptance of academic service learning. American Behavioral Scientist 43, 5 (2000), 868–881.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  45. Rick Homkes. 2008. Assessing It Service-Learning. In Proceedings of the 9th ACM SIGITE Conference on Information Technology Education (Cincinnati, OH, USA) (SIGITE ’08). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 17–22. https://doi.org/10.1145/1414558.1414564Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Rick Homkes and Robert A. Strikwerda. 2009. Meeting the ABET Program Outcome for Issues and Responsibilities: An Evaluation of CS, IS, and IT Programs. In Proceedings of the 10th ACM Conference on SIG-Information Technology Education (Fairfax, Virginia, USA) (SIGITE ’09). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 133–137. https://doi.org/10.1145/1631728.1631764Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Lecia J. Barker, Amy Voida, and Vaughan Nagy. 2021. Service Interruption: Managing Commitment to Community Partners During a Crisis. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research (Virtual Event, USA) (ICER 2021). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 81–91. https://doi.org/10.1145/3446871.3469756Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. Jennifer Jettner, Lynn Pelco, and Katie Elliott. 2017. Service-learning community partner impact assessment report. (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. Wei Jin and Xin Xu. 2019. Near-peer Led Workshops on Game Development for Broadening Participation and Diversity in Computing. In Proceedings of the 2019 ACM Southeast Conference (ACM SE ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, Kennesaw, GA, USA, 39–45. https://doi.org/10.1145/3299815.3314430Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  50. ACM Joint. 2013. IEEE-CS task force on computing curricula. Computer science curricula (2013).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. Martina Jordaan and Nita Mennega. 2021. Community partners’ experiences of higher education service-learning in a community engagement module. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education (2021).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. Yasmin Kafai, Jean Griffin, Quinn Burke, Michelle Slattery, Deborah Fields, Rita Powell, Michele Grab, Susan Davidson, and Joseph Sun. 2013. A cascading mentoring pedagogy in a CS service learning course to broaden participation and perceptions. In Proceeding of the 44th ACM technical symposium on Computer science education (SIGCSE ’13). Association for Computing Machinery, Denver, Colorado, USA, 101–106. https://doi.org/10.1145/2445196.2445228Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  53. Adrianna Kezar and Robert A. Rhoads. 2001. The Dynamic Tensions of Service Learning in Higher Education: A Philosophical Perspective. The Journal of Higher Education 72, 2 (2001), 148–171. https://doi.org/10.2307/2649320Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  54. Nazish Zaman Khan and Andrew Luxton-Reilly. 2016. Is computing for social good the solution to closing the gender gap in computer science?. In Proceedings of the Australasian Computer Science Week Multiconference (ACSW ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1145/2843043.2843069Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  55. Mia Kilkenny, Christopher Lynnly Hovey, Fujiko Robledo Yamamoto, Amy Voida, and Lecia Barker. 2022. Why Should Computer and Information Science Programs Require Service Learning?. In Proceedings of the 53rd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 1 (Providence, RI, USA) (SIGCSE 2022). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 822–828. https://doi.org/10.1145/3478431.3499390Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  56. Kristina T Lambright and Allison F Alden. 2012. Voices from the trenches: Faculty perspectives on support for sustaining service-learning. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement 16, 2 (2012), 9–46.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  57. Ka Hing Lau, Maureen Yin Lee Chan, Cynthia Lok Sum Yeung, and Robin Stanley Snell. 2021. An Exploratory Study of the Community Impacts of Service-Learning. Metropolitan Universities 32, 2 (2021), 106–128.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  58. Christopher A. Le Dantec and W. Keith Edwards. 2008. The View from the Trenches: Organization, Power, and Technology at Two Nonprofit Homeless Outreach Centers. In Proceedings of the 2008 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW ’08). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 589–598. https://doi.org/10.1145/1460563.1460656Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  59. Kendall Leon, Laurie A Pinkert, and Kathryn Trauth Taylor. 2017. Developing accounts of instructor learning: Recognizing the impacts of service-learning pedagogies on writing teachers. Composition Studies 45, 1 (2017), 39–58.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  60. Susan J. Lincke. 2007. Network security auditing as a community-based learning project. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin 39, 1 (March 2007), 476–480. https://doi.org/10.1145/1227504.1227472Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  61. Panagiotis K Linos. 2012. Ten Years of EPICS at Butler University: Experiences from Crafting a Service-Learning Program for Computer Science and Software Engineering. Service-Learning in the Computer and Information Sciences: Practical Applications in Engineering Education (2012), 39–75.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  62. Panagiotis K. Linos, Stephanie Herman, and Julie Lally. 2003. A service-learning program for computer science and software engineering. In Proceedings of the 8th annual conference on Innovation and technology in computer science education (ITiCSE ’03). Association for Computing Machinery, Thessaloniki, Greece, 30–34. https://doi.org/10.1145/961511.961523Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  63. David Lopez, David Franquesa, Leandro Navarro, Fermin Sanchez, Jose Cabré, and Marc Alier. 2015. Participatory learning process through ICT4D projects. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality (TEEM ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, Porto, Portugal, 553–557. https://doi.org/10.1145/2808580.2808664Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  64. Bonnie K. MacKellar, Mihaela Sabin, and Allen Tucker. 2013. Scaling a framework for client-driven open source software projects: a report from three schools. Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges 28, 6 (June 2013), 140–147.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  65. Jane Margolis and Allan Fisher. 2002. Unlocking the clubhouse: Women in computing. MIT press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  66. James McDonald and Lynn A Dominguez. 2015. Developing university and community partnerships: A critical piece of successful service learning. Journal of College Science Teaching 44, 3 (2015).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  67. Cecelia Merkel, Umer Farooq, Lu Xiao, Craig Ganoe, Mary Beth Rosson, and John M. Carroll. 2007. Managing Technology Use and Learning in Nonprofit Community Organizations: Methodological Challenges and Opportunities. In Proceedings of the 2007 Symposium on Computer Human Interaction for the Management of Information Technology (CHIMIT ’07). ACM, New York, NY, USA. https://doi.org/10.1145/1234772.1234783Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  68. Joseph Mertz. 2015. Computing for the Social Good and Cultivating Cultures for Ethical Computing. SIGCAS Comput. Soc. 45, 2 (July 2015), 39–40. https://doi.org/10.1145/2809957.2809970Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  69. Joseph Mertz and Scott McElfresh. 2010. Teaching communication, leadership, and the social context of computing via a consulting course. In Proceedings of the 41st ACM technical symposium on Computer science education (SIGCSE ’10). Association for Computing Machinery, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA, 77–81. https://doi.org/10.1145/1734263.1734291Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  70. Krista Lynn Minnotte and Daphne E Pedersen. 2021. Turnover Intentions in the STEM Fields: The Role of Departmental Factors. Innovative Higher Education 46, 1 (2021), 77–93.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  71. Tania D. Mitchell. 2008. Traditional vs. Critical Service-Learning: Engaging the Literature to Differentiate Two Models. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning 14, 2 (2008), 50–65. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ831374Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  72. Brian A Nejmeh. 2012. Service-Learning in the Computer and Information Sciences: Lessons Learned and Guidance for the Future. Service-Learning in the Computer and Information Sciences: Practical Applications in Engineering Education (2012), 531–570.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  73. Robert Pastel, Marika Seigel, Wei Zhang, and Alex Mayer. 2015. Team Building in Multidisciplinary Client-Sponsored Project Courses. ACM Transactions on Computing Education 15, 4 (Nov. 2015), 19:1–19:23. https://doi.org/10.1145/2700518Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  74. Lasserre Patricia. 2011. Service learning: an HCI experiment. In Proceedings of the 16th Western Canadian Conference on Computing Education (WCCCE ’11). Association for Computing Machinery, Prince George, British Columbia, Canada, 12–16. https://doi.org/10.1145/1989622.1989626Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  75. Andrew J Pearl and Robert K Christensen. 2017. First-Year Student Motivations for Service-Learning: An Exploratory Investigation of Minority Student Perceptions. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement 21, 4 (2017), 117.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  76. Lori Pollock, James Atlas, Tim Bell, and Tracy Henderson. 2018. A Computer Science Study Abroad with Service Learning: Design and Reflections. In Proceedings of the 49th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE ’18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 485–490. https://doi.org/10.1145/3159450.3159589Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  77. Lori Pollock, Chrystalla Mouza, James Atlas, and Terry Harvey. 2015. Field Experiences in Teaching Computer Science: Course Organization and Reflections. In Proceedings of the 46th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, Kansas City, Missouri, USA, 374–379. https://doi.org/10.1145/2676723.2677286Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  78. Emily Porter, Chris Bopp, Elizabeth Gerber, and Amy Voida. 2017. Reappropriating hackathons: the production work of the CHI4Good day of service. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 810–814.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  79. H Richard Priesmeyer, Suzanne D Mudge, and Stephanie G Ward. 2016. Emotional Responses to Service Learning: An Exploratory Study. Journal of learning in Higher Education 12, 2 (2016), 55–61.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  80. Jeria Quesenberry, Randy Weinberg, and Larry Heimann. 2012. Experiences in Service-learning Pedagogy: Lessons for Recruitment and Retention of Under Represented Groups. In Proceedings of the 50th Annual Conference on Computers and People Research (SIGMIS-CPR ’12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 89–90. https://doi.org/10.1145/2214091.2214116Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  81. Cyndi Rader, Doug Hakkarinen, Barbara M. Moskal, and Keith Hellman. 2011. Exploring the Appeal of Socially Relevant Computing: Are Students Interested in Socially Relevant Problems?. In Proceedings of the 42Nd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE ’11). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 423–428. https://doi.org/10.1145/1953163.1953288Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  82. Rebecca A Reid. 2021. Retaining women faculty: The problem of invisible labor. PS: Political Science & Politics 54, 3 (2021), 504–506.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  83. Susan Reiser and Rebecca Bruce. 2008. Service learning meets mobile computing. In Proceedings of the 46th Annual Southeast Regional Conference on XX (ACM-SE 46). Association for Computing Machinery, Auburn, Alabama, 108–113. https://doi.org/10.1145/1593105.1593133Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  84. Susan L. Reiser and Rebecca F. Bruce. 2009. Fabrication: A Tangible Link Between Computer Science and Creativity. In Proceedings of the 40th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE ’09). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 382–386. https://doi.org/10.1145/1508865.1509001Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  85. Brian J. Rosmaita. 2007. Making Service Learning Accessible to Computer Scientists. In Proceedings of the 38th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE ’07). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 541–545. https://doi.org/10.1145/1227310.1227493Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  86. Jean J. Ryoo. 2019. Pedagogy that Supports Computer Science for All. ACM Transactions on Computing Education 19, 4 (July 2019), 36:1–36:23. https://doi.org/10.1145/3322210Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  87. Samar Sabie and Tapan Parikh. 2019. Cultivating Care through Ambiguity: Lessons from a Service Learning Course. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, Glasgow, Scotland Uk, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300507Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  88. Pete Sanderson and Ken Vollmar. 2000. A primer for applying service learning to computer science. In Proceedings of the thirty-first SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education (SIGCSE ’00). Association for Computing Machinery, Austin, Texas, USA, 222–226. https://doi.org/10.1145/330908.331859Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  89. Carol Sevier, Seung Youn Chyung, Janet Callahan, and Cheryl Schrader. 2012. What value does service learning have on introductory engineering students’ motivation and ABET program outcomes? Journal of STEM Education (2012).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  90. Randy Stoecker, Amy Hilgendorf, and Elizabeth A Tryon. 2009. The unheard voices: Community organizations and service learning. Temple University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  91. Amy Voida, Ellie Harmon, and Ban Al-Ani. 2011. Homebrew Databases: Complexities of Everyday Information Management in Nonprofit Organizations. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’11). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 915–924. https://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1979078Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  92. Amy Voida, Ellie Harmon, and Ban Al-Ani. 2012. Bridging between Organizations and the Public: Volunteer Coordinators’ Uneasy Relationship with Social Computing. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Austin, Texas, USA) (CHI ’12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1967–1976. https://doi.org/10.1145/2207676.2208341Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  93. Robert B. Watson. 2018. Enriching Technical Communication Education: Collaborating Across Disciplines and Cultures to Develop the piClinic Console. In Proceedings of the 36th ACM International Conference on the Design of Communication (SIGDOC ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, Milwaukee, WI, USA, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1145/3233756.3233929Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  94. Linda D. Webster and Edward J. Mirielli. 2007. Student reflections on an academic service learning experience in a computer science classroom. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM SIGITE conference on Information technology education (SIGITE ’07). Association for Computing Machinery, Destin, Florida, USA, 207–212. https://doi.org/10.1145/1324302.1324347Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  95. Fujiko Robledo Yamamoto, Lecia Barker, and Amy Voida. 2023. CISing Up Service Learning: A Systematic Review of Service Learning Experiences in Computer and Information Science. ACM Trans. Comput. Educ. (jul 2023). https://doi.org/10.1145/3610776 Just Accepted.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Faculty, Student, and Community Partner Experiences in Computer and Information Science Service Learning

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      Full Access

      • Published in

        cover image ACM Transactions on Computing Education
        ACM Transactions on Computing Education Just Accepted
        EISSN:1946-6226
        Table of Contents

        Copyright © 2024 Copyright held by the owner/author(s).

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Online AM: 27 March 2024
        • Accepted: 6 March 2024
        • Revised: 31 January 2024
        • Received: 29 August 2023
        Published in toce Just Accepted

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
      • Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)38
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)38

        Other Metrics

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader