Skip to main content
Log in

Explicit Numerically Implementable Formulas for Poincaré–Steklov Operators

  • PARTIAL DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS
  • Published:
Computational Mathematics and Mathematical Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper presents explicit numerically implementable formulas for the Poincaré–Steklov operators, such as the Dirichlet–Neumann, Dirichlet–Robin, Robin1–Robin2, and Grinberg–Mayergoiz operators, related to the two-dimensional Laplace equation. These formulas are based on the lemma about a univalent isometric mapping of a closed analytic curve onto a circle. Numerical results for domains with very complex geometries were obtained for several test harmonic functions for the Dirichlet–Neumann and Dirichlet–Robin operators.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 7.
Fig. 8.
Fig. 9.

Notes

  1. Boundary operators of the form \(u + b\frac{{\partial u}}{{\partial \nu }}\) first appeared in Isaac Newton’s (1642–1727) and Georgy Richman’s (1711–1753) works as an empirical dependence of the heat transfer process, but it was not without reason that the French Academy of Sciences twice awarded Victor Robin (1855–1897) the Francoeur Prize (1893 and 1897), as well as the Ponsel Prize (1895). Robin, considering the problem of the surface current density distribution in a conductor, reduced it to an integral equation (long before the advent of the theory of integral equations) and, in the case of a convex conductor, found a solution of this equation by the method of successive approximations.

  2. A short proof, preferable to the original [11] and [12], is given in footnote 4 of [13].

  3. The function \(U\) defined by series (12) depends on the parameter \(r\), as well as the coefficients ck and dk in formula (11). However, this dependence can only affect the rate of convergence of the series in formula (12), but in no way the results presented below and their proofs.

REFERENCES

  1. H. A. Schwarz, “Über Einige Abbildungsaufgaben,” Ges. Math. 2, 65 (1869).

    Google Scholar 

  2. V. I. Agoshkov, “New technique for formulation of domain decomposition algorithms,” Comput. Math. Math. Phys. 60 (3), 353–369 (2020).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. G. A. Grinberg, Selected Issues of Mathematical Theory of Electric and Magnetic Phenomena (Akad. Nauk SSSR, Moscow, 1948) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  4. I. D. Maergoiz, “On the numerical solution of boundary value problems in potential theory by the method of integral equation,” Sib. Math. J. 12 (6), 951–958 (1971).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. B. N. Khoromskij and G. Wittum, “Elliptic Poincaré–Steklov operators,” Numerical Solution of Elliptic Differential Equations by Reduction to the Interface (Springer, Berlin, 2004), pp. 37–62.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. R. G. Novikov and I. A. Taimanov, “Darboux–Moutard transformations and Poincaré–Steklov operators,” Proc. Steklov Inst. Math. 302, 315–324 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. V. I. Lebedev and V. I. Agoshkov, Poincaré–Steklov Operators and Their Applications in Analysis (Otd. Vychisl. Mat. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Moscow, 1983) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  8. H. Poincaré, “La méthode de Neumann et le problème de Dirichlet,” Acta Math. 20, 59–142 (1897).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. W. Stekloff, “Les méthodes géneérales pour résoudre les problèmes fondamentaux de la physique mathématique,” Ann. Fac. Sci. Toulouse Sér. 2 (2), 207 (1900).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. V. I. Arnold, Geometrical Methods in the Theory of Ordinary Differential Equations (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1988).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  11. A. S. Demidov, “A complete asymptotics of the solution of the Dirichlet problem for a two-dimensional Laplace equation with rapidly oscillating boundary data,” Dokl. Math. 53 (1), 81–83 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  12. A. S. Demidov, “Functional geometric method for solving free boundary problems for harmonic functions,” Russ. Math. Surv. 65 (1), 1–94 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. A. S. Demidov, “On numerically implementable explicit formulas for the solutions to the 2D and 3D equations \(\operatorname{div} (\alpha (w)\operatorname{div} w) = 0,\) \(\operatorname{div} (\beta \nabla w) = 0\) with Cauchy data on an analytic boundary,” Funct. Anal. Appl. 55 (1), 52–58 (2021).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. V. I. Krylov and N. N. Bogolyubov, “Approximate solution of the Dirichlet problem,” Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR, No. 12, 283–289 (1929).

  15. L. V. Kantorovich and V. I. Krylov, Approximate Methods of Higher Analysis (Fizmatgiz, Moscow, 1962; Wiley, New York, 1964).

  16. V. K. Vlasov and A. B. Bakushinskii, “The method of potentials and the numerical solution of Dirichlet’s problem for the Laplace equation,” USSR Comput. Math. Math. Phys. 3 (3), 767–776 (1963).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Y. Zhou and W. Cai, “Numerical solution of the Robin problem of Laplace equations with a Feynman–Kac formula and reflecting Brownian motions,” J. Sci. Comput. 69 (1), 107 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10915-016-0184-y

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by ongoing institutional funding. No additional grants to carry out or direct this particular research were obtained.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. S. Demidov.

Ethics declarations

The authors of this work declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Translated by E. Chernokozhin

Publisher’s Note.

Pleiades Publishing remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Demidov, A.S., Samokhin, A.S. Explicit Numerically Implementable Formulas for Poincaré–Steklov Operators. Comput. Math. and Math. Phys. 64, 237–247 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0965542524020040

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0965542524020040

Keywords:

Navigation