Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4hhp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-07T20:01:08.271Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Monte Carlo approach for capacity and delay analyses of multiple interacting airports in Istanbul metroplex

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2024

Z. Kaplan Open the ORCID record for Z. Kaplan [Opens in a new window]  and
C. Çetek Open the ORCID record for C. Çetek [Opens in a new window]
Z. Kaplan*
Affiliation:
Air Traffic Control Department, Samsun University, Ondokuz Mayıs, Samsun, Turkey
C. Çetek
Affiliation:
Air Traffic Control Department, Eskisehir Technical University, İki Eylül, Eskisehir, Turkey
*
Corresponding author: Z. Kaplan; Email: zekeriya.kaplan@samsun.edu.tr
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Istanbul metroplex airspace, home to Atatürk (LTBA), Sabiha Gökçen (LTFJ), and Istanbul (LTFM) international airports, is a critical hub for international travel, trade and commerce between Europe and Asia. The high air traffic volume and the proximity of multiple airports make air traffic management (ATM) a significant challenge. To better manage this complex air traffic, it is necessary to conduct detailed analyses of the capacities of these airports and surrounding airspace. In this study, Monte Carlo simulation is used to determine the ultimate and practical capacities of the airport and surrounding airspace and compare them to identify any differences or limitations. The traffic mix, runway occupancy time and traffic distribution at airspace entry points are randomised variables that directly impact airport and airspace capacities and delays. The study aims to determine the current capacities of the runways and routes in the metroplex airspace and project the future capacities with the addition of new facilities. The results demonstrated that the actual bottleneck could be experienced in airspace, rather than runways, which was the focus of the previous literature. Thus, this study will provide valuable insights for stakeholders in the aviation industry to effectively manage air traffic in the metroplex airspace and meet the growing demand.

Keywords

Air Traffic ManagementDemand and Capacity BalancingMonte Carlo SimulationMetroplex AirspaceAirport CapacityAirspace Capacity
Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , First View , pp. 1 - 26
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Royal Aeronautical Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

World Bank. Air transport, passengers carried, 2022. Retrieved March 2, 2023, from https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/IS.AIR.PSGR?end=2020&start=2007 Google Scholar
Truong, D. Estimating the impact of COVID-19 on air travel in the medium and long term using neural network and Monte Carlo simulation, J. Air Transp. Manag., 2021, 96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2021.102126 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Neufville, R. and Odoni, A.R. Airport Systems: Planning Design, and Management, McGraw-Hill, 2013.Google Scholar
GDSAA. Statistics, 2023. Retrieved December 30, 2023, from https://www.dhmi.gov.tr/Sayfalar/Istatistikler.aspx Google Scholar
Chen, N. and Hong, L.J. Monte Carlo simulation in financial engineering, Proceedings - Winter Simulation Conference, 2007, pp 919–931. https://doi.org/10.1109/WSC.2007.4419688 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chopra, K., Tyagi, V.v., Popli, S. and Pandey, A.K. Technical & financial feasibility assessment of heat pipe evacuated tube collector for water heating using Monte Carlo technique for buildings, Energy, 2023, 267, p 126338. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENERGY.2022.126338 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amar, J.G. The Monte Carlo method in science and engineering, Comput. Sci. Eng., 2006, 8, (2), pp 9–19. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCSE.2006.34 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bang Huseby, A., Vanem, E. and Natvig, B. A new approach to environmental contours for ocean engineering applications based on direct Monte Carlo simulations, Ocean Eng., 2013, 60, pp 124–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.OCEANENG.2012.12.034 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carrier, J.F., Archambault, L., Beaulieu, L. and Roy, R. Validation of GEANT4, an object-oriented Monte Carlo toolkit, for simulations in medical physics, Med. Phys., 2004, 31, (3), pp 484–492. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.1644532 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guatelli, S. and Incerti, S. Monte Carlo simulations for medical physics: From fundamental physics to cancer treatment, Phys. Med., 2017, 33, pp 179–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2017.01.002 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rogers, D.W.O. Fifty years of Monte Carlo simulations for medical physics, Phys. Med. Biol., 2006, 51, (13), p R287. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/51/13/R17 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sarrut, D., Arbor, N., Baudier, T., Borys, D., Etxebeste, A., Fuchs, H., … Maigne, L. The OpenGATE ecosystem for Monte Carlo simulation in medical physics, Phys. Med. Biol., 2022, 67, (18), p 184001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/AC8C83 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Condon, J.H. and Ogielski, A.T. Fast special purpose computer for Monte Carlo simulations in statistical physics, Rev. Sci. Inst., 1998, 56, (9), p 1691. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1138125 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janke, W. Monte Carlo simulations in statistical physics — From basic principles to advanced applications, in Order, Disorder and Criticality: Advanced Problems of Phase Transition Theory, vol. 3, 2012, 93–166. https://doi.org/10.1142/9789814417891_0003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landau, D.P., Tsai, S.-H. and Exler, M. A new approach to Monte Carlo simulations in statistical physics: Wang-Landau sampling, Am. J. Phys., 2004, 72, (10), p 1294. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1707017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baghal, S.R. and Khodashenas, S.R. Risk assessment of storm sewers in urban areas using fuzzy technique and Monte Carlo simulation, J. Irrigation Drainage Eng., 2022, 148, (8), p 04022028. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0001696 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blom, H.A.P., Stroeve, S.H. and de Jong, H.H. Safety risk assessment by monte carlo simulation of complex safety critical operations, Developments in Risk-Based Approaches to Safety - Proceedings of the 14th Safety-Critical Systems Symposium, SSS 2006, 2006, pp 48–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-84628-447-3_3/COVER CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koulinas, G.K., Demesouka, O.E., Sidas, K.A. and Koulouriotis, D.E. A TOPSIS—risk matrix and Monte Carlo expert system for risk assessment in engineering projects, Sustainability, 2021, 13, (20), p 11277. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU132011277 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Senova, A., Tobisova, A. and Rozenberg, R. New approaches to project risk assessment utilizing the Monte Carlo method, Sustainability, 2023, 15, (2), p 1006. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU15021006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stroeve, S.H., Blom, H.A.P. and (Bert) Bakker, G.J. Systemic accident risk assessment in air traffic by Monte Carlo simulation, Safety Sci., 2009, 47, (2), pp 238–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SSCI.2008.04.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hong, S.J. and Najmi, H. Impact of high-speed rail on air travel demand between Dallas and Houston applying Monte Carlo simulation. J. Air Transp. Manag., 2022, 102, p 102222. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JAIRTRAMAN.2022.102222 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pérez-Castán, J.A., Asensio, B., Rodríguez-Sanz, Á., Ho-Huu, V., Sanz, L.P., Comendador, F.G. and Valdés, R.M.A. Impact of continuous climb operations in ATC workload. Case-study Palma airport, J. Air Transp. Manag., 2020, 89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2020.101890 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, X., Hang, Y., Wang, Q. and Zhou, D. Flying into the future: A scenario-based analysis of carbon emissions from China’s civil aviation, J. Air Transp. Manag., 2020, 85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2020.101793 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feuser Fernandes, H. and Müller, C. Optimization of the waiting time and makespan in aircraft departures: A real time non-iterative sequencing model, J. Air Transp. Manag., 2019, 79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2019.101686 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Visintini, A.L., Glover, W., Lygeros, J. and Maciejowski, J. Monte Carlo optimization for conflict resolution in air traffic control, IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst., 2006, 7, (4), pp 470–482. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2006.883108 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hu, R., Feng, H., Witlox, F., Zhang, J. and Connor, K.O. Airport capacity constraints and air traffic demand in China, J. Air Transp. Manag., 2022, 103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2022.102251 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pitfield, D.E. and Jerrard, E.A. Monte Carlo comes to Rome: A note on the estimation of unconstrained runway capacity at Rome Fiumucino International Airport, J. Air Transp. Manag., 1999, 5, (4), pp 185–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Irvine, D., Budd, L.C.S. and Pitfield, D.E. A Monte-Carlo approach to estimating the effects of selected airport capacity options in London, J. Air Transp. Manag., 2015, 42, pp 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2014.06.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhong, Z.W., Varun, D. and Lin, Y.J. Studies for air traffic management R&D in the ASEAN-region context, J. Air Transp. Manag., 2017, 64, pp 15–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2017.06.020 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirata, T., Shimizu, A. and Yai, T. Runway capacity model for multiple crossing runways and impact of tactical sequencing: Case study of Haneda airport in Japan. Asian Transp. Stud., 2013, 2, (3), pp 295–308.Google Scholar
Wang, F. and Zhao, L. Capacity evaluation method for parallel runway based on Monte Carlo simulation, Proceedings of the 30th Chinese Control and Decision Conference (2018 CCDC), Shenyang, China, 2018, pp 5411–5415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pitfield, D.E., Brooke, A.S. and Jerrard, E.A. A Monte-Carlo simulation of potentially conflicting ground movements at a new international airport, J. Air Transp. Manag., 1998, 4, (1), pp 3–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ATAC (Airborne Tactical Advantage Company). Simmod PRO! ATAC Corporation, 2021. Retrieved from https://www.atac.com/simmod-pro/ Google Scholar
Bubalo, B. and Daduna, J.R. Airport capacity and demand calculations by simulation-the case of Berlin-Brandenburg International Airport, NETNOMICS Econ. Res. Electron. Networking, 2011, 12, (3), pp 161–181. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11066-011-9065-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cetek, C., Cinar, E., Aybek, F. and Cavcar, A. Capacity and delay analysis for airport manoeuvring areas using simulation, Aircraft Eng. Aerospace Technol., 2014, 86, (1), pp 43–55. https://doi.org/10.1108/AEAT-04-2012-0058/FULL/XML CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Özdemir, M., Çetek, C. and Usanmaz, Ö. Airside capacity analysis and evaluation of Istanbul Ataturk airport using fast-time simulations, Anadolu Univ. J. Sci. Technol. A Appl. Sci. Eng., 2018, 19, (1), pp 153–164. https://doi.org/10.18038/aubtda.309624 Google Scholar
Özdemir, M. and Usanmaz, Ö. Investigation of the impact of the air traffic route configurations on sector capacity, Anadolu Univ. J. Sci. Technol. A Appl. Sci. Eng., 2017, pp 1–1. https://doi.org/10.18038/aubtda.292020 Google Scholar
Wang, C., Zhang, X. and Xu, X. Simulation study on airfield system capacity analysis using SIMMOD, Proceedings of the 2008 International Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Design, ISCID 2008, vol. 1, 2008, pp 87–90. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISCID.2008.70 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cetek, F.A. and Cetek, C. Simulation modelling of runway capacity for flight training airports, Aeronaut. J., 2014, 118, (1200), pp 143–154. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0001924000009039 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peng, Y., Wei, G. and Jun-Qing, S. Capacity analysis for parallel runway through agent-based simulation, Math. Probl. Eng., 2013, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/505794 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ARC (Airport Research Center). CAST Simulation and Allocation Software, 2021. Retrieved from https://arc.de/cast-simulation-software/ Google Scholar
Bazargan, M., Fleming, K. and Subramanian, P. A simulation study to investigate runway capacity using TAAM, Winter Simulation Conference Proceedings, vol. 2, 2002, pp 1235–1243. https://doi.org/10.1109/WSC.2002.1166383 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeppesen. Total Airspace and Airport Modeler, 2023. Retrieved December 30, 2023, from https://ww2.jeppesen.com/airspace-solutions/total-airspace-and-airport-modeler/ Google Scholar
Transoft Solutions. AirTOP Airside Aircraft | Assess and Improve Airport Capacity by Modeling Airside Aircraft Operations. Transoft Solutions Inc., 2023. Retrieved from https://www.transoftsolutions.com/aviation/software/airport-airspace-fast-time-simulation/airtop-airside-aircraft/ Google Scholar
ISA Software. RAMS Plus – Gate-to-Gate ATM/Airport Fast-Time Simulator. ISA Software, 2023. Retrieved from https://www.ramsplus.com/ Google Scholar
Majumdar, A. and Polak, J. Estimating capacity of Europe’s airspace using a simulation model of air traffic controller workload, Transp. Res. Record, 2001, 1744, (1), pp 30–43. https://doi.org/10.3141/1744-05 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mumayiz, S.A. An Overview of Airport Terminal Simulation Models, 1990. Transportation Research Record, 1273. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/245360399_An_Overview_of_Airport_Terminal_Simulation_Models Google Scholar
Zografos, K.G. and Madas, M.A. Development and demonstration of an integrated decision support system for airport performance analysis, Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol., 2006, 14, (1), pp 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TRC.2006.04.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horonjeff, R., McKelvey, F., Sproule, W. and Young, S. Planning and Design of Airports, McGraw-Hill Companies, 2010.Google Scholar
Janić, M. Air Transport System Analysis and Modelling: Capacity, Quality of Services and Economics, Gordon and Breach Science Publishers, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashford, N.J., Mumayiz, S. and Wright, P.H. Airport Engineering: Planning, Design, and Development of 21st Century Airports (Vol. 4), John Wiley & Sons (S.W.), 2011, New York, NY, USA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ICAO. (2016). Doc 4444-Air Traffic Management Procedures for Air Navigation Services.Google Scholar
Pavlin, S., Zuzic, M. and Pavicic, S. Runway occupancy time as element of runway capacity, Promet-Traffic Transp., 2006, 18, (4), pp 293–299.Google Scholar
Air Navigation Department. Aeronautical Information Publication (AIP) Turkey, 2023. Retrieved March 3, 2023, from https://www.dhmi.gov.tr/Sayfalar/aipturkey.aspx Google Scholar
EUROCONTROL. OneSky Online, 2020. Retrieved December 30, 2023, from https://ext.eurocontrol.int/ Google Scholar
Dönmez, K., Çetek, C. and Kaya, O. Air traffic management in parallel-point merge systems under wind uncertainties, J. Air Transp. Manag., 2022, 104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2022.102268 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SESAR. SESAR Solutions, 2022. Retrieved March 3, 2023, from https://www.sesarju.eu/SESARChallenge2022 Google Scholar
SESAR. SESAR Solutions Catalogue 2021, 2021 https://doi.org/10.2829/369731 CrossRefGoogle Scholar