Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter Mouton April 3, 2024

Laughing and unlaughing at religion-related fake news in Estonia

  • Liisi Laineste

    Liisi Laineste (PhD) is Research professor at the Department of Folkloristics of the Estonian Literary Museum. Her main research pertains to folk humor and its online manifestations, ethnic humor, visual forms of humor (e.g., caricatures and memes), digital folklore, and online communication, many of which represent an interdisciplinary angle and combine folkloristics with linguistics, psychology, sociology, and communication studies.

    ORCID logo EMAIL logo
    , Anastasiya Fiadotava

    Anastasiya Fiadotava (PhD) is Senior Research Fellow at the Department of Folkloristics of the Estonian Literary Museum, Tartu. Her fields of interest include the use of humour in family communication, the spread of jokes and memes in social and mainstream media, and the reflections of current political and social issues in humour.

    and Tõnno Jonuks

    Tõnno Jonuks (PhD) is Research professor at the Department of Folkloristics of the Estonian Literary Museum. His main research includes history of religions in Estonia with the main focus on materiality of religion.

From the journal HUMOR

Abstract

Contemporary contacts and interactions with religion are often mediated by mass and social media. These sources vary in their reliability and some are known for their use of humor as a communicative strategy. In this article we analyze how humorous religion-related news triggers reactions to and discussions about the intertwined issues of humor, religion, history and ethnic identity. First, we look at how people perceive religion as an institution, contextualizing the results against the backdrop of the historical and present-day role of religion in the (ethnically, politically, and culturally) divided Estonian society. Second and more broadly, we analyze the (mis)use of strong religious symbols. We aim to understand why serious reactions to initially humorous fake news come about, and why humorous stimuli are sometimes met with discontent or even disgust. This contributes to understanding the intersection of humor and religion in divided societies. The results point out that the religious controversies triggered by humor are related to societal and political issues rather than ideas about religion and belief. We suggest that fast and broad dissemination via online media might be one of the reasons why the humorous and serious are closely interwoven in discussions on religious issues.


Corresponding author: Liisi Laineste, Estonian Literary Museum, Tartu, Estonia, E-mail:

Funding source: Source Documents in the Cultural Process: Estonian Materials in the Collections and Databases of the Estonian Literary Museum

Award Identifier / Grant number: EKKD 65

Funding source: Narrative and Belief Aspects of Folklore Studies

Award Identifier / Grant number: EKM 8-2/20/3

Funding source: European Union through the European Regional Development Fund (Centre of Excellence in Estonian Studies

Award Identifier / Grant number: TK 145

About the authors

Liisi Laineste

Liisi Laineste (PhD) is Research professor at the Department of Folkloristics of the Estonian Literary Museum. Her main research pertains to folk humor and its online manifestations, ethnic humor, visual forms of humor (e.g., caricatures and memes), digital folklore, and online communication, many of which represent an interdisciplinary angle and combine folkloristics with linguistics, psychology, sociology, and communication studies.

Anastasiya Fiadotava

Anastasiya Fiadotava (PhD) is Senior Research Fellow at the Department of Folkloristics of the Estonian Literary Museum, Tartu. Her fields of interest include the use of humour in family communication, the spread of jokes and memes in social and mainstream media, and the reflections of current political and social issues in humour.

Tõnno Jonuks

Tõnno Jonuks (PhD) is Research professor at the Department of Folkloristics of the Estonian Literary Museum. His main research includes history of religions in Estonia with the main focus on materiality of religion.

  1. Research funding: This work was supported by Source Documents in the Cultural Process: Estonian Materials in the Collections and Databases of the Estonian Literary Museum (EKKD 65) and Narrative and Belief Aspects of Folklore Studies (EKM 8-2/20/3) and European Union through the European Regional Development Fund (Centre of Excellence in Estonian Studies (TK 145).

References

Ahmed, Wasim, Josep Vidal-Alaball, Joseph, Downing & Francesc Lopez Seguí. 2020. Dangerous messages or satire? Analysing the conspiracy theory linking 5g to covid-19 through social network analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research 22(5). e19458. https://doi.org/10.2196/19458.Search in Google Scholar

Avramov, Kiril, Vasily Gatov & Ilya Yablokov. 2020. Conspiracy theories and fake news. Routledge handbook of conspiracy theories, 512–524. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780429452734-4_10Search in Google Scholar

Baider, Fabienne. 2023. Covert Islamophobia and anti-Semitism via conspiracy theory. In Victoria Guillén-Nieto, Antonio Doval Pais & Dieter Stein (eds.), From fear to hate: Legal-linguistic perspectives on migration, 149–172. Berlin and Boston: Walter de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110789157-007Search in Google Scholar

Berridge, Willow J. 2019. Islamism and the instrumentalisation of conspiracism. In Asbjørn Dyrendal, David G. Robertson & Egil Asprem (eds.), Handbook of conspiracy theory and contemporary religion, 303–320. Leiden and Boston: Brill.10.1163/9789004382022_015Search in Google Scholar

Billig, Michael. 2005. Laughter and ridicule: Towards a social critique of humour. Thousand Oaks: Sage.10.4135/9781446211779Search in Google Scholar

Brüggemann, Karsten & Andres Kasekamp. 2008. The politics of history and the “War of Monuments” in Estonia. Nationalities Papers 36(3). 425–448. https://doi.org/10.1080/00905990802080646.Search in Google Scholar

Crouch, Harold. 2001. Managing ethnic tensions through affirmative action: The Malaysian experience. In Nat J. Colletta, Teck Ghee Lim & Anita Kelles-Viitanen (eds.), Social cohesion and conflict prevention in Asia: Managing diversity through development, 225–262. Washington DC: The World Bank.Search in Google Scholar

Cunningham, Lawrence S. 1999. Saints and martyrs: Some contemporary considerations. Theological Studies 60(3). 529–537. https://doi.org/10.1177/004056399906000307.Search in Google Scholar

Davies, Christie. 1998. Jokes and their relation to society. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar

Davies, Christie. 2002. The mirth of nations. New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Douglas, Karen M. & Robbie M. Sutton. 2023. What are conspiracy theories? A definitional approach to their correlates, consequences, and communication. Annual Review of Psychology 74. 271–298. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-032420-031329.Search in Google Scholar

Draitser, Emil. 1989. Soviet underground jokes as a means of popular entertainment. Journal of Popular Culture 23(1). 117–125. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-3840.1989.2301_117.x.Search in Google Scholar

Dynel, Marta & Michele Zappavigna. 2023. Enacting polyvocal scorn in #CovidConspiracy tweets: The orchestration of voices in humorous responses to COVID-19 conspiracy theories. Discourse, Context & Media 52. 100670.10.1016/j.dcm.2023.100670Search in Google Scholar

ERR. 2022. Census: Small rise in Estonia in those with no religious beliefs, 2 November. https://news.err.ee/1608774886/census-small-rise-in-estonia-in-those-with-no-religious-beliefs (accessed 3 November 2022).Search in Google Scholar

Geybels, Hans & Walter Van Herck (eds.). 2011. Humour and religion: Challenges and ambiguities. London and New York: Bloomsbury Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

Golozubov, Oleksandr. 2014. Concepts of laughter and humor in the sociology of religion. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 14. 528–534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.04.465.Search in Google Scholar

Juzefovičs, Jānis & Triin Vihalemm. 2020. Digital humor against essentialization: Strategies of Baltic Russian-speaking social media users. Political Geography 81. 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2020.102204.Search in Google Scholar

Kibanja, Grace M., Mayanja M. Kajumba & Laura R. Johnson. 2012. Ethnocultural conflict in Uganda: Politics based on ethnic divisions inflame tensions across the country. In Dan Landis & Rosita D. Albert (eds.), Handbook of ethnic conflict, 403–435. Boston, MA: Springer.10.1007/978-1-4614-0448-4_16Search in Google Scholar

Kivirähk, Juhan. 2014. Integrating Estonia’s Russian-speaking population: Findings of national defense opinion surveys. Tallinn, Estonia: International Centre for Defence and Security.Search in Google Scholar

Koort, Katja. 2014. The Russians of Estonia: Twenty years after. World Affairs 177(2). 66–73.Search in Google Scholar

Kuipers, Giselinde. 2006. Good humor, bad taste: A Sociology of the joke. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110898996Search in Google Scholar

Kuipers, Giselinde. 2011. The politics of humour in the public sphere: Cartoons, power and modernity in the first transnational humour scandal. European Journal of Cultural Studies 14(1). 63–80. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549410370072.Search in Google Scholar

Laineste, Liisi, Anastasiya Fiadotava & Tõnno Jonuks. 2020. When the moral mentors lapse: A comparative study of Estonian and Belarusian clergy jokes. Folklore 131(3). 292–309. https://doi.org/10.1080/0015587X.2019.1708075.Search in Google Scholar

Lewis, Paul (ed.). 2008. The Muhammad cartoons and humor research: A collection of essays. Humor – International Journal of humour Research 21(1). 1–46. https://doi.org/10.1515/humour.2008.001.Search in Google Scholar

Märk, Kristi. 2005. Lihula mälestusmärgi juhtum avaliku arutelu objektina [The case of the Lihula memorial as an object of public debate]. Tartu: University of Tartu BA thesis. http://dspace.ut.ee/bitstream/handle/10062/15497/Baktoo_Mark.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

Peck, Andrew. 2020. A problem of amplification: Folklore and fake news in the age of social media. Journal of American Folklore 133(529). 329–351. https://doi.org/10.5406/jamerfolk.133.529.0329.Search in Google Scholar

Pettai, Vello. 2021. National identity and re-identity in post-Soviet Estonia. Journal of Baltic Studies 52(3). 425–436. https://doi.org/10.1080/01629778.2021.1944236.Search in Google Scholar

Remmel, Atko & Meelis Friedenthal. 2020. Atheism and free-thought in Estonian culture. In Tomáš Bubik, Atko Remmel & David Vaclavik (eds.), Freethought and atheism in Central and Eastern Europe: The development of secularity and non-religion, 84–110. London: Routledge Routledge Studies in Religion.10.4324/9780429276071-5Search in Google Scholar

Robertson, David G., Egil Asprem & Asbjørn Dyrendal. 2019. Introducing the field: Conspiracy theory in, about and as religion. In Asbjørn Dyrendal, David G. Robertson & Egil Asprem (eds.), Handbook of conspiracy theory and contemporary religion, 1–20. Leiden and Boston: Brill.10.1163/9789004382022_002Search in Google Scholar

Şafak-Ayvazoğlu, Ayşe, Filiz Künüroğlu, Fons Van de Vijver & Kutlay Yağmur. 2021. Acculturation of Syrian refugees in The Netherlands: Religion as social identity and boundary marker. Journal of Refugee Studies 34(1). 555–578. https://doi.org/10.1093/jrs/feaa020.Search in Google Scholar

Sazonov, Vladimir, Sergii Pakhomenko & Igor Kopytin. 2021. Between history and propaganda: Estonia and Latvia in Russian historical narratives. In Holger Mölder, Vladimir Sazonov, Archil Chochia & Tanel Kerikmäe (eds.), The Russian Federation in global knowledge warfare. Influence operations in Europe and its neighbourhood, 397–423. Cham: Springer.10.1007/978-3-030-73955-3_20Search in Google Scholar

Schvak, Toomas. 2018. Õigeusu kirik ja vanausulised [Orthodox church and Old believers]. In Riho Altnurme (ed.), Eesti kiriku- ja religioonilugu [The history of Estonian church and religion], 189–198. Tartu: Tartu Ülikooli Kirjastus.Search in Google Scholar

Schweizer, Bernard. 2019. Christianity and the triumph of humor: From Dante to David Javerbaum. Oxford and New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780429196690Search in Google Scholar

Selart, Anti. 1998. Varlaam, Püha preestermärtri Isidori ja seitsmekümne kahe teise märtri vaevamine [Varlaam, the tormenting of the holy priest-martyr Isidore and the seventy-two other martyrs]. Akadeemia 3. 489–500.Search in Google Scholar

Shilikhina, Ksenia M. 2020. Humour and intertextuality in online spoof news. The European Journal of Humour Research 8(3). 83–98. https://doi.org/10.7592/ejhr2020.8.3.shilikhina.Search in Google Scholar

Sienkiewicz, Matt. 2018. The carnival’s edge: Charlie Hebdo and theories of comedy. Jewish History 32(1). 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10835-018-9303-7.Search in Google Scholar

Smith, Moira. 2009. Humor, unlaughter, and boundary maintenance. Journal of American Folklore 122(484). 148–171. https://doi.org/10.1353/jaf.0.0080.Search in Google Scholar

Tandoc, Edson C.Jr., Zheng Wei Lim & Richard Ling. 2018. Defining “fake news,”. Digital Journalism 6(2). 137–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2017.1360143.Search in Google Scholar

Tandoc, Edson C.Jr. 2021. Fake news. In Howard, Tumber & Silvio Waisbord (eds.), The Routledge companion to media disinformation and populism, 110–117. London: Routledge.10.4324/9781003004431-12Search in Google Scholar

Tsakona, Villy. 2020. Recontextualizing humor: Rethinking the analysis and teaching of humor. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9781501511929Search in Google Scholar

Urmson, James Opie. 1958. Saints and heroes. In Abraham Irving Melden (ed.), Essays in moral philosophy, 198–216. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Search in Google Scholar

Žitkienė, Rima & Gintarė Kriaučiūnaitė-Lazauskienė. 2019. The interplay of religious symbols and cultural values theory in advertising. Organizacijų vadyba: sisteminiai tyrimai [Management of organizations: Systematic research 81. 119–137. https://doi.org/10.1515/mosr-2019-0008.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2023-01-25
Accepted: 2024-02-04
Published Online: 2024-04-03
Published in Print: 2024-05-27

© 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 7.5.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/humor-2023-0119/html
Scroll to top button