Skip to main content
Log in

Putting Discourses About the War in Ukraine on a Map: How Different is Everyone’s Story?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Politics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The article discusses political and media discourses on Russia’s all-out war in Ukraine. It assesses how convergent or divergent discourses are and determines whether the assumption of globalization of information flows holds at the time of war. Political and media discourses are considered here in conjunction. A method for visualizing and measuring the divergence or convergence of political and media discourses is developed and applied. In addition to illuminating the concept of war propaganda, it can be used to test a range of theories about relationships between governments and mass media in a comparative perspective. The geographical scope of the study includes five countries: Russia, Ukraine, the United States, the United Kingdom, and France. The coverage of the first twelve weeks of the war by eleven mass media is considered, as well as speeches devoted to the war delivered by presidents of the five countries during the same period.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Source: Google Trends. Numbers represent search interest relative to the highest point on the chart for the given country and time. A value of 100 is the peak popularity for the term

Fig. 2

Source: PROXSCAL algorithm for multidimensional scaling; Normalized Raw Stress: 0.003, Stress-I: 0.057

Fig. 3

Source: PROXSCAL algorithm for multidimensional scaling; Normalized Raw Stress: 0.005, Stress-I: 0.072

Fig. 4

Source: PROXSCAL algorithm for multidimensional scaling; Normalized Raw Stress: 0.022, Stress-I: 0.147

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The Ukrainian army subsequently liberated some of the territories initially occupied by Russia, yet those events fall outside this study’s temporal scope.

  2. The official translation at http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/67843.

  3. Journalists from other countries tend to offer less biased coverage of the war than journalists representing a belligerent (Knightley 2003). For instance, British correspondents were better placed to write about Vietnam than their American colleagues.

  4. The U.N. General Assembly resolution condemning Russia for annexing some of Ukraine’s territories was adopted on October 12, 2022, by a 143-nation vote in favour (five nations voted against and 35 abstentions) illustrates the point (https://press.un.org/en/2022/ga12458.doc.htm). Russia, Belarus, the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, Nicaragua, and Syria opposed the resolution. The list of absentees includes China and India.

  5. No operations with foreign currencies were allowed for particulars in Russia during the period in consideration.

  6. The 2022 Pulitzer Prize Winner in Special Citations and Awards (https://www.pulitzer.org/winners/journalists-ukraine).

References

  • Altheide, David L. 2000. Tracking discourse and qualitative document analysis. Poetics 27 (4): 287–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Altheide, David L., and Jennifer N. Grimes. 2005. War programming: the propaganda project and the Iraq War. The Sociological Quarterly 46 (4): 617–643.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ameli, Saied Reza, and Hamideh Molaei. 2020. Election journalism: investigating media bias on telegram during the 2017 presidential election in Iran. Digital Journalism 8 (8): 975–991.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amirov, Valery A. 2021. Osobennosti funktsionirovaniya onomasticheskih edinits v militarnom diskurse vooruzhennogo konflikta na vostoke Ukrainy [functional features of onomastic units in the military discourse of the donbass conflict]. Voprosy Onomastiki 18 (1): 237–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, Albert. 1990. Mechanisms of moral disengagement. In Origins of terrorism: psychologies, ideologies, theologies, states of mind, ed. Walter Reich, 161–191. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barthel, Martin, and Hans-Joachim. Bürkner. 2020. Ukraine and the big moral divide: what biased media coverage means to east european borders. Geopolitics 25 (3): 633–657.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett, Tom. 2014. Analyzing power in language: a practical guide. Abington: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, W. Lance. 1990. Toward a theory of press-state relations in the United States. Journal of Communication 40 (2): 103–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolinm, Göran., and Per Ståhlberg. 2023. Managing meaning in Ukraine: information, communication, and narration since the Euromaidan revolution. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Boltanski, Luc, and Laurent Thévenot. 2006. On justification: economies of worth. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Boman, Björn. 2023. The coexistence of nationalism, westernization, russification, and russophobia: facets of parallelization in the Russian invasion of Ukraine. International Politics. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41311-023-00495-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyd-Barrett, Oliver. 2017. Ukraine, mainstream media and conflict propaganda. Journalism Studies 18 (8): 1016–1034.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, James D.J.. 2014. ‘Better one tiger than ten thousand rabid rats’: Russian media coverage of the Syrian conflict. International Politics 51 (1): 45–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cavari, Amnon, Moran Yarchi, and Shira Pindyck. 2017. Foreign news on US media: a longitudinal analysis of news coverage of Israel. Israel Studies 22 (1): 24–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, Krystel, and Maya Eichler. 2014. Engendering two solitudes? Media representations of women in combat in Quebec and the rest of Canada. International Journal 69 (4): 594–611.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coe, Kevin, and Anthony Schmidt. 2012. America in black and white: locating race in the modern presidency, 1933–2011. Journal of Communication 62 (4): 609–627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coskuner-Balli, Gokcen. 2020. Citizen-consumers wanted: revitalizing the american dream in the face of economic recessions, 1981–2012. Journal of Consumer Research 47 (3): 327–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dijk, Van, and A. Teun. 2001. Multidisciplinary CDA: A plea for diversity. In Methods of Critical discourse analysis, ed. Ruth Wodak and Michael Meyer, 95–120. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellul, Jacques. 1973. Propaganda: the formation of men’s attitudes. New York: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Entman, Robert M. 2003. Cascading activation: contesting the white house’s frame After 9/11. Political Communication 20 (4): 415–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fairclough, Norman, and Isabela Fairclough. 2012. Political discourse analysis: a method for advanced students. Abington: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flyvbjerg, Bent. 2006. Five Misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry 12 (2): 219–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, Michel. 2007. Security, Territory, Population. Lectures at the Collège de France, 19771978. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

  • Fournier, Anne. 2010. Ukraine’s orange revolution: beyond soviet political culture? In Orange revolution and aftermath: mobilization, apathy, and the state in Ukraine, ed. Paul D’Anieri, 110–128. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gartner, Scott Sigmund. 2004. Making the International local: the terrorist attack on the USS cole, local casualties, and media coverage. Political Communication 21 (2): 139–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goode, Paul. 2022. How Russian Television Prepared the Public for War. Ponars Eurasia Policy Memo 761. https://www.ponarseurasia.org/how-russian-television-prepared-the-public-for-war/.

  • Guo, Lei, Katherine Yi-Ning. Chen, Vu. Hong, Qian Wang, Radoslaw Aksamit, Damian Guzek, Marek Jachimowski, and Maxwell McCombs. 2015. Coverage of the Iraq war in the United States, mainland China, Taiwan and Poland: a transnational network agenda-setting study. Journalism Studies 16 (3): 343–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hallin, Daniel C., and Paolo Mancini. 2004. Comparing media systems: three models of media and politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hallin, Daniel C., and Paolo Mancini. 2012. Conclusion. In Comparing media systems beyond the western world, ed. Daniel C. Hallin and Paolo Mancini, 278–304. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harasymiw, Bohdan. 2002. Post-communist Ukraine. Edmonton: Canadian Institute of Ukrainian Studies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, Roderick P. 2022. Why trump lost and how? A Rhetorical Explanation. American Behavioral Scientist 66 (1): 7–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, Roderick P., and Colene J. Lind. 2010. Words and their ways in campaign ’08. American Behavioral Scientist 54 (4): 355–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herman, Edward S., and Noam Chomsky. 2008. Manufacturing consent: the political economy of the mass media. London: The Bodley Head.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, Ceri. 2019. The god card: strategic employment of religious language in U.S. Presidential Discourse. International Journal of Communication 13: 528–549.

    Google Scholar 

  • Husak, Olviia. 2020. Content-analytical studies in detecting propaganda media. Aktualnye nauchnye issledovaniya v sovremennom mire Issue 4(60), part 6: 5–10.

  • Jakobsen, Peter Viggo. 2000. Focus on the CNN effect misses the point: the real media impact on conflict management is invisible and indirect. Journal of Peace Research 37 (2): 131–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jurafsky, Daniel, and James H. Martin. 2008. Speech and language processing: an introduction to natural language processing, computational linguistics, and speech recognition, 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knightley, Philip. 2003. The first casualty: the war correspondent as hero, propagandist, and myth-maker from the crimea to the Gulf War II. London: André Deutsch.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koltsova, E. 2000. Change in the coverage of the chechen wars: reasons and consequences. Javnost-the Public 7 (3): 39–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koshkin, P.G. 2019. The new cold war narrative in American and Russian media in 2019 (The New York times, USA Today, Kommersant, Rossiyskaya Gazeta). Communications Media Design 4 (2): 94–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koutieba, Alashhab. 2018. Osobennosti otrazheniya sirijskogo voennogo protivoborstva v media Sirii, Rossii i stran Zapada [The interpretation of the syrian military confrontation by the media of Syria, Russia and the countries of the West]. Communicology 6 (5): 120–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kovalchuk, Liudmyla, and Yuliia Litkovych. 2022. Psycholinguistic aspects of representing aggression in wartime media discourse. East European Journal of Psycholinguistics 9 (2): 67–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krippendorff, Klaus. 2004. Content analysis: an introduction to its methodology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruskal, Joseph, and Myron Wish. 1978. Multidimensional scaling. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lasswell, Harold D. 1938. Propaganda technique in the world War. New York: Peter Smith.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasswell, Harold D, Nathan Leites & Associates. 1949. Language of politics: studies in quantitative semantics. New York: George W. Stewart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leuven, Van, and Sarah & Peter Berglez. 2016. Global journalism between dream and reality: a comparative study of the times, Le Monde and De Standaard. Journalism Studies 17 (6): 667–683.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, David. 1997. The two rhetorical presidencies: An Analysis of Televised Presidential Speeches, 1947–1991. American Politics Research 25 (3): 380–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, David A., and Roger P. Rose. 2002. The president, the press, and the war-making power: an analysis of media coverage prior to the Persian Gulf war. Presidential Studies Quarterly 32 (3): 559–571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, Niklas. 1979. Trust and power. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lukin, Annabelle. 2013. The meanings of “war”: from lexis to context. Journal of Language and Politics 12 (3): 424–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mearsheimer, John. 2014. Why the Ukraine crisis Is the West’s Fault. Foreign Affairs 93: 77–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merrin, William. 2018. Digital war: a critical introduction. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mölder, Martin, and Eiki Berg. 2023. Conflicts and Shifts in the kremlin’s political discourse since the start of the putin presidency (2000–2019). Europe-Asia Studies 75 (4): 564–582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Namenwirth, J. Zvi. 1973. Wheels of time and the interdependence of value change in America. Journal of Interdisciplinary History 3 (4): 649–683.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norris, Adele N., and Joseph Billings. 2017. Colorblind ideology, mass incarceration, and controlling racial images: An intersectional analysis of presidential rhetoric from 1969–1996. Journal of Ethnicity and Criminal Justice 15 (1): 78–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nye, Joseph S. 2011. The future of power. New York: Public Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nygren, Gunnar, Michal Glowacki, Jöran. Hök, Ilya Kiria, Dariya Orlova, and Daria Taradai. 2018. Journalism in the crossfire: Media coverage of the war in Ukraine in 2014. Journalism Studies 19 (7): 1059–1078.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oleinik, Anton. 2015a. The language of power: a content analysis of presidential addresses in North America and the Former Soviet Union, 1993–2012. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 236: 181–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oleinik, Anton. 2015b. The Invisible hand of power: an economic theory of gatekeeping. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Oleinik, Anton. 2018. Building Ukraine from within: a sociological, institutional, and economic analysis of a nation-state in the making. Stuttgart: Ibidem-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oleinik, Anton. 2020. ‘Detection of opinion communities with the help of chance-corrected measures of agreement’. SN Computer science 1(3): art. 136.

  • Pankow, Thees, and Robert G. Patman. 2018. Rethinking Russia’s Ukraine involvement 2013–2016: the domestic political imperatives of Putin’s operational code. International Politics 55 (5): 537–556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pavlov, Dmytro. 2015. Teoriya propagandy Zhaka Ellyulya [Jacques Ellul’s theory of propaganda]. Naukovyi visnyk Odes’kogo natsional’nogo ekonomichnogo universytetu. Ekonomika, politologiya, istoriya 10(230): 198–211.

  • Peri, Yoram. 2012. The impact of national security on the development of media systems. In comparing media systems beyond the western world, ed. Daniel C. Hallin and Paolo Mancini, 11–25. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petersson, Jöran., Judy Sayers, and Paul Andrews. 2023. Two methods for quantifying similarity between textbooks with respect to content distribution. International Journal of Research & Method in Education 46 (3): 161–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ravi, Kumar, and Vadlamani Ravi. 2015. A survey on opinion mining and sentiment analysis: tasks, approaches and applications. Knowledge-Based Systems 89: 14–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Said, Edward. 1975. Beginnings: intention and method. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sassen, Saskia. 2000. Territory and Territoriality in the global economy. International Sociology 15 (2): 372–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seyranian, Viviane, and Michelle C. Bligh. 2008. Presidential charismatic leadership: exploring the rhetoric of social change. The Leadership Quarterly 19 (1): 54–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soroka, Stuart. 2014. Reliability and Validity in Automated Content Analysis. In Roderick P. Hart (ed) Communication and Language Analysis in the Corporate World, 352–363. Hershey, PA: IGI Global.

  • Tilly, Charles. 1985. War Making and State Making as Organized Crime. In Bringing the state back in, ed. Peter B. Evans, Dietrich Rueschemeyer, and Theda Skopol, 169–191. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Watanabe, Kohei. 2017. Measuring news bias: Russia’s official news agency ITAR-TASS’ coverage of the Ukraine crisis. European Journal of Communication 32 (3): 224–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, Max. 1968. Economy and society: an outline of interpretative sociology. New York: Bedminster Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, Robert P. 1982. The long-term dynamics of societal problem-solving: a content-analysis of british speeches from the throne, 1689–1972. European Journal of Political Research 10 (4): 387–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, Ralf K. 1949. Hitler, roosevelt, and the nature of war propaganda. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 44 (2): 157–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaller, J., and D. Chiu. 1996. Government’s little helper: US press coverage of foreign policy crises, 1945–1991. Political Communication 13 (4): 385–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

the author thanks two International Politics anonymous reviewers for their suggestions and comments made on early versions of the article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anton Oleinik.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix ‘Descriptive statistics for 15 most frequent categories included in the custom-built dictionary’

Appendix ‘Descriptive statistics for 15 most frequent categories included in the custom-built dictionary’

 

Putin

Zelensky

Biden

Johnson

Marcon

NYT

CNN

WP

The Times

Le Monde

UP

RBC

Liga

Gazeta.ru

Kommersant

Izvestia

Ukraine

0.64 [2]

0.89 [1]

1.19 [1]

1.12 [1]

0.84 [1]

0.52 [1]

1.36 [1]

0.62 [1]

0.46 [1]

0.87 [1]

0.74 [1]

1.83 [1]

0.87 [1]

0.86 [2]

0.25 [3]

0.34 [2]

Russia

0.86 [1]

0.73 [2]

0.92 [2]

0.40 [3]

0.45 [3]

0.49 [2]

0.87 [2]

0.52 [2]

0.37 [2]

0.52 [2]

0.48 [4]

1.02 [2]

0.56 [4]

1.25 [1]

0.63 [1]

0.65 [1]

war

0.18 [10]

0.59 [4]

0.34 [5]

0.27 [5]

0.61 [2]

0.33 [3]

0.30 [4]

0.35 [3]

0.32 [3]

0.42 [3]

0.36 [6]

0.66 [3]

0.76 [2]

0.07 [23]

0.07 [14]

0.05 [24]

Kyiv

0.20 [8]

0.10 [17]

0.06 [16]

0.19 [9]

0.06 [17]

0.09 [11]

0.25 [6]

0.1 [11]

0.10 [7]

0.28 [4]

0.22 [10]

0.31 [5]

0.23 [8]

0.29 [6]

0.10 [8]

0.21 [6]

sanctions

0.05 [24]

0.19 [11]

0.18 [11]

0.18 [10]

0.10 [11]

0.09 [10]

0.15 [11]

0.11 [9]

0.10 [8]

0.14 [7]

0.07 [20]

0.22 [10]

0.11 [19]

0.34 [5]

0.27 [2]

0.20 [7]

defence

0.07 [17]

0.29 [7]

0.33 [6]

0.23 [6]

0.06 [17]

0.07 [13]

0.18 [10]

0.11 [8]

0.11 [6]

0.04 [23]

0.40 [5]

0.28 [7]

0.37 [5]

0.19 [13]

0.06 [16]

0.23 [4]

USA

0.23 [5]

0.06 [26]

0.31 [7]

0.02 [30]

0.06 [17]

0.15 [6]

0.05 [24]

0.12 [7]

0.06 [16]

0.08 [12]

0.11 [16]

0.31 [6]

0.21 [11]

0.47 [3]

0.22 [4]

0.25 [3]

the State

0.57 [3]

0.70 [3]

0.03 [24]

0.04 [22]

0.13 [7]

0.07 [14]

0.09 [16]

0.08 [17]

0.05 [19]

0.05 [18]

0.12 [15]

0.11 [21]

0.11 [17]

0.09 [19]

0.09 [10]

0.11 [10]

NATO

0.23 [5]

0.04 [29]

0.25 [8]

0.20 [8]

0.13 [7]

0.06 [15]

0.14 [12]

0.1 [12]

0.07 [12]

0.10 [10]

0.05 [27]

0.1 [23]

0.06 [27]

0.16 [15]

0.06 [17]

0.09 [16]

security

0.22 [7]

0.14 [14]

0.19 [10]

0.06 [16]

0.13 [7]

0.05 [21]

0.09 [14]

0.08 [20]

0.05 [22]

0.08 [13]

0.05 [25]

0.13 [18]

0.11 [19]

0.13 [17]

0.08 [11]

0.11 [12]

Putin

0.00 [54]

0.00 [54]

0.39 [4]

0.70 [2]

0.03 [22]

0.24 [4]

0.33 [3]

0.28 [4]

0.25 [4]

0.17 [6]

0.10 [17]

0.22 [9]

0.13 [15]

0.20 [10]

0.08 [12]

0.10 [14]

people

0.20 [8]

0.20 [10]

0.58 [3]

0.40 [3]

0.29 [4]

0.21 [5]

0.27 [5]

0.22 [5]

0.21 [5]

0.03 [29]

0.04 [28]

0.04 [31]

0.04 [30]

0.03 [30]

0.02 [30]

0.02 [33]

oil & gas

0.03 [31]

0.09 [21]

0.03 [24]

0.06 [16]

0.10 [11]

0.11 [8]

0.07 [20]

0.09 [14]

0.07 [13]

0.12 [9]

0.08 [19]

0.14 [16]

0.08 [22]

0.24 [8]

0.17 [5]

0.09 [15]

territory

0.33 [4]

0.17 [12]

0.10 [13]

0.03 [25]

0.06 [17]

0.02 [26]

0.06 [23]

0.03 [27]

0.03 [26]

0.04 [21]

0.31 [9]

0.2 [11]

0.23 [9]

0.20 [11]

0.08 [13]

0.17 [8]

EU

0.03 [29]

0.08 [22]

0.05 [19]

0.03 [25]

0.10 [11]

0.03 [25]

0.09 [15]

0.02 [30]

0.05 [20]

0.06 [15]

0.05 [26]

0.16 [15]

0.07 [24]

0.25 [7]

0.12 [7]

0.11 [11]

words

19,511

133,782

22,232

13,239

3101

5,213,627

1,786,222

1,479,203

3,871,581

1,464,944

288,137

5,103,670

490,085

392,613

479,454

196,533

% classified

5.17

6.64

5.96

5.06

4.13

3.46

5.92

4.15

3.16

4.11

6.37

8.46

6.82

6.78

3.22

4.06

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Oleinik, A. Putting Discourses About the War in Ukraine on a Map: How Different is Everyone’s Story?. Int Polit (2024). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41311-024-00564-x

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41311-024-00564-x

Keywords

Navigation