Skip to main content
Log in

Monte Carlo Simulation of Liver Dosimetry with Yttrium-90 Radionuclide Using Gate: 3D Phantom

  • Published:
Bulletin of the Lebedev Physics Institute Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study is aimed to validate 90Y dosimetry with MC simulation by comparing the TLD measurements results obtained in 3D liqid phantom (LP) and its monte carlo (MC) simulation. In the first step, tumor imitation was filled with 1900 µCi (70.3 MBq) amount of 99mTc activity in LP. In addition, 24 thermoluminescence dosimetry chips (TLD-100) were placed in 8 different locations in the LP. The same measurement system was created in GEANT4 Tomography Emission Application (GATE version 8.1). DoseActor library was defined for 24 points instead of TLDs and doses were taken. In the second step, 90Y with the amount of 2 mCi (74 MBq) activity and 27 DoseActor libraries were placed in tumor mimic and different locations in LP to calculate the dose distribution with GATE. GATE and TLD results for 99mTc were compared for validation. The strong correlation coefficient was calculated between the instant absorbed dose rates obtained via TLD measurements and GATE calculations as R2 = 0.994. At the 90Y dosimetry, the highest, lowest and mean cumulative absorbed doses calculated by GATE for a half-life were found to be 1.166 × 102 ± 3.907 × 10–1, 5.440 × 101 ± 2.597 × 10–1, and 75.145 ± 0.303 Gy in the tumor imitation, and 1.167 × 101 ± 1.777 × 10−1, 9.929 × 10−5 ± 6.905 × 10−5, 1.169 ± 0.019 Gy in the liver parenchymal tissue imitation, respectively. GATE program is considered to be a promising application in internal radionuclide dosimetry, based on linear correlation between TLD and GATE measurements in our study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.

REFERENCES

  1. Kouri, B.E., Abrams, R.A., Al-Refaie, W.B., et al., ACR appropriateness criteria radiologic management of hepatic malignancy, J. Am. Coll. Radiol., 2012, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 265–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Walker, L.A., Radioactive yttrium 90: A review of its properties, biological behavior, and clinical uses, Acta Radiologica: Therapy, Physics, Biology, 1963, vol. 2, pp. 302–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sarrut, D., Bardiès, M., Boussion, N., Freud, N., Jan, S., Létang, J.-M., Loudos, G., Maigne, L., Marcatili, S., Mauxion, T., Papadimitroulas, P., Perrot, Y., Pietrzyk, U., Robert, C., Schaart, D.R., Visvikis, D., and Buvat, I., A review of the use and potential of the GATE Monte Carlo simulation code for radiation therapy and dosimetry applications, Med. Phys., 2014, vol. 41, no. 6, part 1, p. 064301. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.4871617

  4. Dezarn, W., Cessna, J., DeWerd, L., et al., Recommendations of the American association of physicists in medicine on dosimetry, imaging, and quality assurance procedures for 90y microsphere brachytherapy in the treatment of hepatic malignancies., Med. Phys., 2011, vol. 38, pp. 4825–4845.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Forrest, B.B., MCNP—A general Monte Carlo n-particle transport code, Version 5 LA-UR-03-1987, Los Alamos: Los Alamos National Laboratory, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Briesmeister, J.F., MCNP: A general Monte Carlo n-particle transport code, Tech. Rep., Los Alamos National Laboratory, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kawrakow, E., Mainegra-Hing, D., Rogers, F., Kawrakow, I., Rogers, D., Mainegra, E., Tessier, F., and Walters, B., The EGSnrc code system, Monte Carlo simulation of electron and photon transport, Tech. Rep. NRCC Report PIRS-701, National Research Council of Canada, Ottawa, Canada, 2003.

  8. OECD/NEA, Penelope—a code system for Monte Carlo simulation of electron and photon transport, Workshop Proc., Issy-les-Moulineaux, France, 2001.

  9. Agostinelli, S. et al., GEANT4: A simulation toolkit, Nucl. Instrum. Meth., 2003, vol. A506, pp. 250–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9002(03)01368-8

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Jan, S., et al., GATE v6: A major enhancement of the GATE simulation platform enabling modeling of CT and radiotherapy, Phys. Med. Biol., 2011, vol. 56, no. 4, pp. 881–901. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/56/4/001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Villoing, D., Marcatili, S., Garcia, M.-P., and Bardiès, M., Internal dosimetry with the Monte Carlo code GATE: Validation using the ICRP/ICRU female reference computational model, Phys. Med. Biol., 2017, vol. 62, no. 5, pp. 1885–1904. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/62/5/1885

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. van der Laan, D.J.J., Schaart, D.R., Maas, M.C., Beekman, F.J., Bruyndonckx, P., and van Eijk, C.W.E., Optical simulation of monolithic scintillator detectors using GATE/GEANT4, Phys. Med. Biol., 2010, vol. 55, no. 6, pp. 1659–1675. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/55/6/009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Effects of ionizing radiation: UNSCEAR 2006 report to the General Assembly, with scientific annexes c, d, and e, United Nations Publications, 2009.

  14. Djokic, D., Technetium-99m radiopharmaceuticals for in vivo diagnostics, Medicinski Pregled, 2005, vol. 58, nos. 3–4, pp. 180–184. https://doi.org/10.2298/mpns0504180d

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sadeghi, M., Sina, S., and Faghihi, R., Investigation of LiF, Mg, and Ti (TLD-100) reproducibility, J. Biomed. Phys. Eng., 2015, vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 217–222.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Saygın, H., et al., A virtualized tier-3g facility installation in WLCG network of CERN, 19th International Workshop on Advanced Computing and Analysis Techniques in Physics Research, Zurich, 2019.

  17. Furetta, C., Prokic, M., Salamon, R., Prokic, V., and Kitis, G., Dosimetric characteristics of tissue equivalent thermoluminescent solid TL detectors based on lithium borate, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A, 2001, vol. 456, no. 3, pp. 411–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9002(00)00585-4

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. Gundogdu, E. et al., Radiopharmaceuticals used in imaging and treatment in nuclear medicine, J. Lit. Pharm. Sci., 2018, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 24–34. https://doi.org/10.5336/pharmsci.2017-56434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ghahraman Asl, R., Nasseri, S., Parach, A.A., and Zakavi, S.R., Momennezhad, M., and Davenport, D., Monte Carlo and experimental internal radionuclide dosimetry in RANDO head phantom, Australas. Phys. Eng. Sci. Med., 2015, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 465–472. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13246-015-0367-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Mayles, P., Nahum, A., and Rosenwald, J., Handbook of Radiotherapy Physics: Theory and Practice, London: Boca Raton: Taylor and Francis, 2007. ISBN: 9780750308601

  21. Taschereau, R. and Chatziioannou, A., Monte Carlo simulations of absorbed dose in a mouse phantom from 18-fluorine compounds, J. Med. Phys., 2007, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 1026–1036.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. McNally, P., GI/Liver Secrets, Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Gulec, S.A., Mesoloras, G., Dezarn, W.A., McNeillie, P., and Kennedy, A.S., Safety and efficacy of Y-90 microsphere treatment in patients with primary and metastatic liver cancer: The tumor selectivity of the treatment as a function of tumor to liver flow ratio, J. Transl. Med., 2007, vol. 5, no. 1, p. 15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Welsh, J.S., Radiographically identified necrosis after 90Y microsphere brachytherapy: A new standard for oncologic response assessment?, Am. J. Roentgenol., 2007, vol. 188, no. 3, pp. 765–767. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.07.5320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ariel, I.M., Radioactive isotopes for adjuvant cancer therapy: Animal experimentation and preliminary results in human application, Archives of Surgery, 1964, vol. 89, no. 2, pp. 244–249. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.1964.01320020008002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kennedy, A.S., Nutting, C., Coldwell, D., Gaiser, J., and Drachenberg, C., Pathologic response and microdosimetry of 90Y microspheres in man: Review of four explanted whole livers, Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys., 2004, vol. 60, no. 5, pp. 1552–1563. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.09.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Venkatesh, S.K., Chandan, V., and Roberts, L.R., Liver masses: A clinical, radiologic, and pathologic perspective, Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology: The Official Clinical Practice, J. Am. Gastroenterol. Assoc., 2014, vol. 12, no. 9, pp. 1414–1429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2013.09.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by ongoing institutional funding. No additional grants to carry out or direct this particular research were obtained.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ayşe Karadeniz-Yildirim.

Ethics declarations

The authors of this work declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note.

Allerton Press remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Karadeniz-Yildirim, A., Ozkorucuklu, S., Tanyildizi-Kokkulunk, H. et al. Monte Carlo Simulation of Liver Dosimetry with Yttrium-90 Radionuclide Using Gate: 3D Phantom. Bull. Lebedev Phys. Inst. 51, 30–37 (2024). https://doi.org/10.3103/S1068335623600201

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3103/S1068335623600201

Keywords:

Navigation