Skip to main content
Log in

Damage Evolution Model Considering Fatigue Failure Factor Under Multiaxial Non-Proportional Loading

  • Research paper
  • Published:
Experimental Techniques Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Chaudonneret model cannot fully and effectively characterize the linear correlation between the strain energy density release rate and the number of cycles in the damage evolution stage of low carbon alloy steels under multiaxial non-proportional loading. In order to solve this problem, the fatigue failure process of Q355B is captured by digital image correlation technology, and the factors affecting fatigue failure under multiaxial loading are analyzed in combination with fracture morphology characteristics. Based on the concept of critical plane, a new stress combination form is introduced to reflect the failure factors, and the corresponding damage evolution model is proposed. The model considers the interaction between different stresses and can describe the damage evolution law under non-proportional loading. Compared with different types of life prediction models, the distribution range of life prediction results of the improved model under multiaxial non-proportional loading has a good correlation with the experimental values.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Liu N, Cui X, Xiao J, Lua J, Phan N (2020) A simplified continuum damage mechanics based modeling strategy for cumulative fatigue damage assessment of metallic bolted joints. Int J Fatigue 105302:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.105302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Madeleine C (1993) A simple and efficient multiaxial fatigue damage model for engineering applications of macro-crack initiation. J Eng Mater Technol 115(4):373–379. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2904232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chaboche JL, Lesne PM (1988) A non-linear continuous fatigue damage model. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct 11:1–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2695.1988.tb01216.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Voyiadjis GZ, Taqieddin ZN, Kattan PI (2008) Anisotropic damage–plasticity model for concrete. Int J Plast 24(10):1946–1965. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2008.04.002

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Ma S, Yuan H (2017) A continuum damage model for multi-axial low cycle fatigue of porous sintered metals based on the critical plane concept. Mech Mater 104:13–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmat.2016.09.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Li B, Zhou H, Liu J, Kang C (2021) Multiaxial fatigue damage and reliability assessment of aero-engine compressor blades made of TC4 titanium alloy. Aerosp Sci Technol 119:107107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2021.107107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ma S, Yuan H (2013) Damage evolution and modeling of sintered metals under multi-axial loading conditions. Comput Mater Sci 80:123–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2013.05.040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lemaitre J (1992) A course on damage mechanics. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. Yuan H, Zhang L, Ma S (2019) Damage evolution and characterization for sintered powder metals with the varying porosity. Eng Fract Mech 207:86–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2018.12.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Giancane S, Panella FW, Nobile R, Dattoma V (2010) Fatigue damage evolution of fiber reinforced composites with digital image correlation analysis. Procedia Eng 2:1307–1315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2010.03.142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Qin L, Guo C, Sun W, Zhang M, Chu X, Wang F (2022) Experimental study on interfacial damage characteristics of CRTS II slab track and CA mortar with AE and DIC techniques. Eng Fail Anal 142:106777. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2022.106777

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Liu B, Chen K, Zhou R (2021) Damage evolution and fatigue life prediction of the shape memory alloy under low cycle fatigue. Mater Today Commun 26:101636. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2020.101636

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Venkatachalam S, Khaja Mohiddin SM, Murthy H (2018) Determination of damage evolution in CFRP subjected to cyclic loading using DIC. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct 41:1412–1425. https://doi.org/10.1111/ffe.12786

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Chen Y, Sun S, Ji C (2018) Analysis of aluminum sheets with multiple sites damage based on fatigue tests and DIC technique. Int J Fatigue 109:37–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2017.12.008

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Su W, Zhu H (2022) Multiaxial fatigue behavior and life prediction of 2198-T8 Al-Li alloy notched tubular specimen based on DIC technique. Int J Damage Mech 31:957–974. https://doi.org/10.1177/10567895211066337

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Liu F, Guo R, Lin X, Zhang X, Huang S, Yang F, Cheng X (2022) Monitoring the damage evolution of reinforced concrete during tunnel boring machine hoisting by acoustic emission. Constr Build Mater 327:127000. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.127000

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ren Z, Qin X, Zhang Q, Sun Y (2022) Multiaxial fatigue life prediction model based on an improved strain energy density criterion. Int J Press Vessels Pip 199:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpvp.2022.104724

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ferreira GV, Campos ERFS, Neves RS, Desmorat R, Malcher L (2022) An improved continuous damage model to estimate multiaxial fatigue life under strain control problems. Int J Damage Mech 31(6):815–844. https://doi.org/10.1177/10567895221091306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Shen F, Zhao B, Li L, Chua C, Zhou K (2017) Fatigue damage evolution and lifetime prediction of welded joints with the consideration of residual stresses and porosity. Int J Fatigue 103:272–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2017.06.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lemaitre J, Chaboche J-L (1994) Mechanics of solid materials. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  21. Zhang T, McHugh PE, Leen SB (2012) Finite element implementation of multiaxial continuum damage mechanics for plain and fretting fatigue. Int J Fatigue 44:260–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2012.04.011

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Shang D, Sun G, Yan C, Chen J, Cai N (2007) Creep-fatigue life prediction under fully-reversed multiaxial loading at high temperatures. Int J Fatigue 29(4):705–712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2006.06.010

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Ge J, Sun Y, Xu J, Yang Z, Liang J (2017) Fatigue life prediction of metal structures subjected to combined thermal-acoustic loadings using a new critical plane model. Int J Fatigue 96:89–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2016.11.023

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Chen X, Xu S, Huang D (1999) A critical plane-strain energy density criterion for multiaxial low-cycle fatigue life under non-proportional loading. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct 22(8):679–686. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1460-2695.1999.t01-1-00199.x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Fatemi A, Socie DF (1988) A critical plane approach to multiaxial fatigue damage including out of phase loading. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct 11(3):149–165. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2695.1988.tb01169.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 52075389).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Y. Sun.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

We wish to confirm that there are no known conflicts of interest associated with this publication and there has been no significant financial support for this work that could have influenced its outcome.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ren, Z., Qin, X., Zhang, Q. et al. Damage Evolution Model Considering Fatigue Failure Factor Under Multiaxial Non-Proportional Loading. Exp Tech (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40799-024-00706-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40799-024-00706-z

Keywords

Navigation