Skip to main content
Log in

Characterization of Vaginal Lactobacilli with Potential Probiotic Properties Isolated from Healthy Women in Northern Iran

  • ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLE
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Microbiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Vaginal lactobacilli protect against bacterial vaginosis and vaginal candidiasis. They may have probiotic properties and help maintain the balance and health of the vaginal ecosystem while the loss of these bacteria predisposes females to urinary and genital infections. The aim of this study was to investigate the probiotic potential of vaginal Lactobacillus among healthy females in northern Iran. The Lactobacillus strains were isolated from vaginal samples and were identified by sequencing of the 16S rRNA fragment. Functional properties such as tolerance to low pH, H2O2 production, adherence ability to Hela cells and antagonistic activity against Candida albicans was examined. A total of 38 vaginal lactobacilli strains from five species, including Lactobacillus crispatus (n = 13), Lactobacillus gasseri (n = 10), Lactobacillus acidophilus (n = 6), Lactobacillus jensenii (n = 5) and Lactobacillus johnsonii (n = 4), were identified. All of the species showed significant tolerance to low pH over 24 h (p < 0.001). The best adherence ability to Hela cells was seen in Lactobacillus gasseri strains. Nearly 17 of the strains had higher anti-candida activity compared to the other strains. According to the findings, four lactobacilli strains isolated in the vaginal samples of healthy Iranian women had the best probiotic potential.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of Data and Materials

Not applicable.

Code Availability

Not applicable.

References

  1. Nami Y et al (2014) Assessment of probiotic potential and anticancer activity of newly isolated vaginal bacterium Lactobacillus plantarum 5BL. Microbiol Immunol 58:492–502. https://doi.org/10.1111/1348-0421.12175

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Srinivasan S, Fredricks DN (2008) The human vaginal bacterial biota and bacterial vaginosis. Interdiscip Perspect Infect Dis. https://doi.org/10.1155/2008/750479

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Ahmadi M et al (2017) Analysis of cervical lesions for presence of HSV-2 and HPV-16 and HPV-18 in Iranian patients by PCR. Horm Mol Biol Clin Investig 31:20170019. https://doi.org/10.1515/hmbci-2017-0019

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Chee WJY, Chew SY, Than LTL (2020) Vaginal microbiota and the potential of Lactobacillus derivatives in maintaining vaginal health. Microb Cell Fact 19:203. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12934-020-01464-4

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Santos CM et al (2016) Selection of Lactobacillus strains as potential probiotics for vaginitis treatment. Microbiology 162:1195–1207. https://doi.org/10.1099/mic.0.000302

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Borges S, Silva J, Teixeira P (2014) The role of lactobacilli and probiotics in maintaining vaginal health. Arch Gynecol Obstet 289:479–489. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-013-3064-9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Petrova MI et al (2015) Lactobacillus species as biomarkers and agents that can promote various aspects of vaginal health. Front Physiol 6:81. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2015.00081

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Kligler B, Cohrssen A (2008) Probiotics. Am Fam Phys 78:1073–1078

    Google Scholar 

  9. Witkin SS, Linhares IM (2017) Why do lactobacilli dominate the human vaginal microbiota? BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol 124:606–611. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.14390

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Champer M et al (2018) The role of the vaginal microbiome in gynaecological cancer. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol 125:309–315. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.14631

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Motevaseli E, Dianatpour A, Ghafouri-Fard S (2017) The role of probiotics in cancer treatment: emphasis on their in vivo and in vitro anti-metastatic effects. Int J Mol Cell Med 6:66. https://doi.org/10.22088/acadpub.BUMS.6.2.1

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Richardson MD (2005) Changing patterns and trends in systemic fungal infections. J Antimicrob Chemother 56:i5–i11. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dki218

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Chen X et al (2007) The S-layer proteins of Lactobacillus crispatus strain ZJ001 is responsible for competitive exclusion against Escherichia coli O157: H7 and Salmonella typhimurium. Int J Food Microbiol 115:307–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2006.11.007

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Chen C-C, Walker WA (2005) Probiotics and prebiotics: role in clinical disease states. Adv Pediatr 52:77–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yapd.2005.03.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Dubernet S, Desmasures N, Guéguen M (2002) A PCR-based method for identification of lactobacilli at the genus level. FEMS Microbiol Lett 214:271–275. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6968.2002.tb11358.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Gu XC et al (2014) Cloning and analysis of bile salt hydrolase genes from Lactobacillus plantarum CGMCC No. 8198. Biotechnol Lett 36:975–983. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10529-013-1434-9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Corzo G, Gilliland S (1999) Bile salt hydrolase activity of three strains of Lactobacillus acidophilus. J Dairy Sci 82:472–480. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(99)75256-2

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Khalil R et al (2007) Evaluation of the probiotic potential of lactic acid bacteria isolated from faeces of breast-fed infants in Egypt. Afr J Biotechnol 6:939–949

    Google Scholar 

  19. Al Kassaa I et al (2014) Identification of vaginal lactobacilli with potential probiotic properties isolated from women in North Lebanon. Microb Ecol 67:722–734. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-014-0384-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Pino A et al (2019) Detection of vaginal lactobacilli as probiotic candidates. Sci Rep 9:3355. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-40304-3

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Eschenbach DA et al (1989) Prevalence of hydrogen peroxide-producing Lactobacillus species in normal women and women with bacterial vaginosis. J Clin Microbiol 27:251–256. https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.27.2.251-256.1989

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Hütt P et al (2016) Characterisation of probiotic properties in human vaginal lactobacilli strains. Microb Ecol Health Dis 27:30484. https://doi.org/10.3402/mehd.v27.30484

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Mousavi E et al (2016) In vitro adherence of Lactobacillus strains isolated from the vaginas of healthy Iranian women. J Chin Med Assoc 79:665–671. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcma.2016.04.007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Martínez-Peña MD, Castro-Escarpulli G, Aguilera-Arreola MG (2013) Lactobacillus species isolated from vaginal secretions of healthy and bacterial vaginosis-intermediate Mexican women: a prospective study. BMC Infect Dis 13:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-13-189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Vitali B et al (2007) Dynamics of vaginal bacterial communities in women developing bacterial vaginosis, candidiasis, or no infection, analyzed by PCR-denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis and real-time PCR. Appl Environ Microbiol 73:5731–5741. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01251-07

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Nami Y, Haghshenas B, Khosroushahi AY (2018) Molecular identification and probiotic potential characterization of lactic acid bacteria isolated from human vaginal microbiota. Adv Pharm Bull 8:683. https://doi.org/10.15171/apb.2018.077

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Gupta S, Kakkar V, Bhushan I (2019) Crosstalk between vaginal microbiome and female health: a review. Microb Pathog 136:103696. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micpath.2019.103696

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Organization WH (2006) Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Probiotics in food. Health and nutritional properties and guidelines for evaluation. FAO Food Nutr Pap 85:2

    Google Scholar 

  29. Kiray E, Kariptas E, Azarkan SY (2019) Evaluation of vaginal lactobacilli with potential probiotic properties and biotherapeutic effects isolated from healthy Turkish women. PSM Microbiol 4:56–70

    Google Scholar 

  30. Nami Y et al (2014) Probiotic potential and biotherapeutic effects of newly isolated vaginal Lactobacillus acidophilus 36YL strain on cancer cells. Anaerobe 28:29–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anaerobe.2014.04.012

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Gu X-C et al (2014) Cloning and analysis of bile salt hydrolase genes from Lactobacillus plantarum CGMCC No. 8198. Biotechnol Lett 36:975–983. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10529-013-1434-9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Starling S (2013) Global probiotics market to grow 6.8% annually until 2018

  33. Dover S et al (2008) Natural antimicrobials and their role in vaginal health: a short review. Int J Probiotics Prebiotics 3:219

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Reid G, Dols J, Miller W (2009) Targeting the vaginal microbiota with probiotics as a means to counteract infections. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care 12:583–587. https://doi.org/10.1097/MCO.0b013e328331b611

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Otero MC, Nader-Macías ME (2007) Lactobacillus adhesion to epithelial cells from bovine vagina. Commun Curr Res Educ Top Trends Appl Microbiol 20007:749–757

    Google Scholar 

  36. Kumherová M et al (2021) Novel potential probiotic Lactobacilli for prevention and treatment of vulvovaginal infections. Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins 13:163–172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12602-020-09675-2

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Sengupta R et al (2013) The role of cell surface architecture of lactobacilli in host-microbe interactions in the gastrointestinal tract. Mediat Inflamm. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/237921

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Vladareanu R et al (2018) New evidence on oral L. plantarum P17630 product in women with history of recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis (RVVC): a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 22:262–267

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Kinoshita H et al (2008) Cell surface Lactobacillus plantarum LA 318 glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) adheres to human colonic mucin. J Appl Microbiol 104:1667–1674. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2007.03679.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Authors would like to thank staff of Amol Pasture Institute.

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design and experiments. Material preparation, performed experiments, data collection and analysis were performed by HZ, RIA, MR, HK. The first draft of the manuscript was written by HZ. FZ Supervised, directed and managed the study. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fatemeh Zaboli.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there are no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of Amol Azad University (ID: IR.IAU.AMOL.REC.1400.051). At the beginning, all study participants were given adequate information about the study. Then informed consent was obtained.

Consent to Participate

The procedure was explained to all the recruited participate who signed written informed consent forms.

Consent for Publication

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

See Table 5.

Table 5 The relationship between delivery types and Lactobacillus species frequencies for study sample

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zare, H., Izadi Amoli, R., Rezapour, M. et al. Characterization of Vaginal Lactobacilli with Potential Probiotic Properties Isolated from Healthy Women in Northern Iran. Indian J Microbiol (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12088-023-01186-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12088-023-01186-2

Keywords

Navigation