The following article is Open access

High Accuracy Photodissociation Rates in VULCAN with MCRT

and

Published April 2024 © 2024. The Author(s). Published by the American Astronomical Society.
, , Citation Elspeth K. H. Lee and Shang-Min Tsai 2024 Res. Notes AAS 8 96 DOI 10.3847/2515-5172/ad390f

2515-5172/8/4/96

Abstract

Photochemical processing is a key influence on the chemical compositions of exoplanet atmospheres. We develop a 1D plane-parallel Monte Carlo radiative-transfer (MCRT) path length method to calculate actinic fluxes for photochemical modeling, which we couple to the VULCAN photochemical model. Due to the flexible nature of MCRT methods, this enables accurate calculation of photodissociation rates for complex multiple scattering scenarios encountered in exoplanet atmospheres such as high altitude haze layers.

Export citation and abstract BibTeX RIS

Original content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 licence. Any further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the title of the work, journal citation and DOI.

1. Adding MCRT to VULCAN

Monte Carlo radiative-transfer (MCRT) techniques have long been used as when high accuracy is required for complex radiative-transfer calculations such as 3D multiple scattering simulations (e.g., Noebauer & Sim 2019). We develop a 1D MCRT plane-parallel method python module gCMCRT.py accelerated using numba (Lam et al. 2015) as part of the VULCAN photochemical model framework (Tsai et al. 2021).

For 1D plane-parallel simulations using the unweighted Lucy (1999) path length method, the zeroth moment of the intensity, the mean intensity, Jλ (erg s−1 cm−2 cm−1), for a wavelength, λ (cm), in a layer is given by

Equation (1)

where Δz (cm) is the layer thickness, Δt (s) the time of simulation (typically 1s), epsilonλ (erg cm−2 cm−1) the packet energy density and l (cm) the path length of the packet through the layer and μ the cosine angle of the packet.

One of the key quantities in photochemical modeling is the actinic flux, which is the effective number of photons per unit area per unit time per unit wavelength regardless of direction. The original VULCAN model uses the two-stream approximation for the UV radiative transfer calculation to obtain the diffuse component of the actinic flux. The conversion from the total diffuse flux to the required mean intensity is described in Tsai et al. (2021) (Section 2.4). For the MCRT model, the actinic flux is simply related to the mean intensity, Factinic,λ  = 4πJλ . For shortwave radiation, each packet carries a fraction of the incident flux, Finc,λ (erg s−1 cm−2 cm−1),

Equation (2)

where μ is the zenith cosine angle of the stellar irradiation and Nph the number of packets.

Due to this divisibility, energy is guaranteed to be conserved, since each photon packet carries a proportional fraction of the total energy (Lucy 1999). Packets are initialized at the top of the atmosphere with a direction of −μ, after which they are free to scatter or be absorbed by the atmosphere. Packets are terminated after being absorbed in the atmosphere or escape through the top of the atmosphere. We include surface Lambertian scattering should surface effects be required. We find only Nph ∼ 1000+ packets per wavelength band are required to get a good signal of the mean intensity, allowing a quick computational time only a few times slower than two-stream methods.

The advantage of MCRT schemes is that no assumptions are made on the radiation propagation direction and scattering source function, as scattering phase functions are sampled randomly for each scattering event (e.g., Noebauer & Sim 2019). So far we include sampling isotropic, Rayleigh and Henyey–Greenstein phase functions in the model, but more complex phase functions can be easily added in the future.

We foresee the MCRT module being highly useful for complex multiple scattering scenarios such as high altitude clouds/hazes where strong albedos and forward scattering are expected, allowing accurate computation for the photolysis rates (e.g., Michelangeli et al. 1992). Figure 1 shows a possible haze scenario for the default VULCAN HD 189733b hot Jupiter simulation and how it affects the mean intensity profile. This method is generally applicable, and can be adapted for other modeling efforts which also require complex shortwave multiple scattering calculations.

Figure 1.

Figure 1. Total mean intensity vs pressure for the default VULCAN HD 189733b simulation at a zenith cosine angle of 0.1, comparing the MCRT model with different scattering phase functions to the current two-stream model. We include a hypothetical haze layer scenario with a single scattering albedo and asymmetry factor of 0.9 across all wavelength bins.

Standard image High-resolution image

Acknowledgments

E.K.H.L. is supported by the SNSF Ambizione Fellowship grant (#193448). S-M. Tsai is supported by the University of California at Riverside.

Software: VULCAN (Tsai et al. 2021).

Please wait… references are loading.
10.3847/2515-5172/ad390f