Better nanoscience through open, collaborative, and critical discussions
Abstract
We aim to foster a discussion of science correction and of how individual researchers can improve the quality and control of scientific production. This is crucial because although the maintenance of rigorous standards and the scrupulous control of research findings and methods are sometimes taken for granted, in practice, we are routinely confronted with articles that contain errors.
- This article is part of the themed collection: Recent Review Articles
Please wait while we load your content...
