No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Measuring the Partisan Behavior of U.S. Newspapers, 1880 to 1980
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 April 2024
Abstract
In this paper, we study newspaper partisan behavior and content, which we measure using coverage of and commentary on partisan activities, institutions, and actors. We use this measure to describe the levels of relative partisan behavior during the period 1880 to 1900, and to describe changes over the period 1880 to 1980. We find that, on average, newspapers were initially highly partisan, but gradually became less partisan over time. Importantly, we find as much change after the 1910s as before, which contributes to the existing literature that focuses on changes in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. We also investigate words and phrases that had negative or positive partisan connotations in particular periods. Finally, we examine whether some of the common hypotheses offered in the literature can account for the changes. The initial findings suggest that these explanations can only account for part of the decline.
- Type
- Article
- Information
- Copyright
- © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Economic History Association
Footnotes
We thank Michael Auslen, Sabrina Goldfischer, Matthew Kind, and Sam Throm for their excellent research assistance. We thank Eric Schickler for suggesting that we look at the Election Bill in the 1890s and David Mayhew for suggesting that we look at the Court Reform Plan in 1937. We thank Paul Rhode for generously sharing the county-level wealth data. We thank seminar and conference participants at the European University Institute, Princeton University, NYC Media Seminar, Wake Forest University Political Economy Conference, EPSA 2023 Conference, and Harvard University for their helpful comments. We also thank Julia Cagé, Matthew Gentzkow, James Hamilton, Stephen Lacy, Maria Petrova, Ricardo Puglisi, Eric Schickler, Robert Y. Shapiro, Jesse Shapiro, Kenneth Shepsle, Paul Starr, Marco Tabellini, Lynn Vavreck, Arjun Vishwanath, and Hye Young You for their helpful comments.
References
REFERENCES
Anderson, Simon P., and McLaren, John. “Media Mergers and Media Bias with Rational Consumers.” Journal of the European Economic Association 10, no. 4 (2012): 831–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldasty, Gerald J. The Commercialization of News in the Nineteenth Century. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Baum, Matthew A., and Groeling, Tim. “New Media and the Polarization of American Political Discourse.” Political Communication 25, no. 4 (2008): 345–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bensel, Richard Franklin. The Political Economy of American Industrialization, 1877–1900. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergan, Daniel E., Stephen Lacy, Dustin Carnahan, Stamm, Michael, and Krier, Daniel H.. “Reinforcement in the Aggregate: Partisan Newspaper Circulation and the Presidential Vote, 1900–1928.” Journalism Studies 22, no. 14 (2021): 1911–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernhardt, Dan, Krasa, Stefan, and Polborn, Mattias. “Political Polarization and the Electoral Effects of Media Bias.” Journal of Public Economics 92, no. 5–6 (2008): 1092–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Besley, Timothy, and Prat, Andrea. “Handcuffs for the Grabbing Hand? Media Capture and Government Accountability.” American Economic Review 96, no. 3 (2006): 720–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bogart, Leo. “How the Challenge of Television News Affects the Prosperity of Daily Newspapers.” Journalism Quarterly 52, no. 3 (1975): 403–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnham, Walter D. “Communication.” American Political Science Review 65, no. 4 (1971): 1149–52.Google Scholar
Chan, Jimmy, and Suen, Wing. “Media as Watchdogs: The Role of News Media in Electoral Competition.” European Economic Review 53, no. 7 (2009): 799–814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Bernard C. The Press and Foreign Policy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1963.Google Scholar
D’Alessio, Dave, and Allen, Mike. “Media Bias in Presidential Elections: A Meta-Analysis.” Journal of Communication 50, no. 4 (2000): 133–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DellaVigna, Stefano, and Gentzkow, Matthew. “Persuasion: Empirical Evidence.” Annual Review of Economics 2, no. 1 (2010): 643–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dorsett, Lyle W. Franklin D. Roosevelt and the City Bosses. Port Washington, NY: Kennikat Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Epstein, Richard A. “International News Service v. Associated Press: Custom and Law as Sources of Property Rights in News.” Virginia Law Review 78, no. 1 (1992): 85–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gentzkow, Matthew. “Television and Voter Turnout.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 121, no. 3 (2006): 931–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gentzkow, Matthew, Glaeser, Edward L., and Goldin, Claudia. “The Rise of the Fourth Estate. How Newspapers Became Informative and Why It Mattered.” In Corruption and Reform: Lessons from America’s Economic History, edited by Edward, L. Glaeser and Goldin, Claudia, 187–230. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gentzkow, Matthew, and Shapiro, Jesse M.. “What Drives Media Slant? Evidence From U.S. Daily Newspapers.” Econometrica 78, no. 1 (2010): 35–71.Google Scholar
Gentzkow, Matthew, Shapiro, Jesse M., and Sinkinson, Michael. “The Effect of Newspaper Entry and Exit on Electoral Politics.” American Economic Review 101, no. 7 (2011): 2980–3018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gentzkow, Matthew, Shapiro, Jesse M., and Sinkinson, Michael. “Competition and Ideological Diversity: Historical Evidence from US Newspapers.” American Economic Review 104, no. 10 (2014): 3073–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gentzkow, Matthew, Shapiro, Jesse M., and Stone, Daniel F.. “Media Bias in the Marketplace: Theory.” In Handbook of Media Economics, volume 1, edited by Simon, P. Anderson, Waldfogel, Joel, and Strömberg, David, 623–45. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2015.Google Scholar
Gentzkow, Matthew, Shapiro, Jesse M., and Taddy, Matt. “Measuring Group Differences in High-Dimensional Choices: Method and Application to Congressional Speech.” Econometrica 87, no. 4 (2019): 1307–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Groeling, Tim. “Media Bias by the Numbers: Challenges and Opportunities in the Empirical Study of Partisan News.” Annual Review of Political Science 16 (2013): 129–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Groeling, Tim, and Baum, Matthew. “Partisan News Before Fox: Newspaper Partisanship and Partisan Polarization, 1869–1992.” HKS Faculty Research Working Paper Series RWP13-035, Cambridge, MA, September 2013.Google Scholar
Groseclose, Tim, and Milyo, Jeffrey. “A Measure of Media Bias.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 120, no. 4 (2005): 1191–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamborg, Felix, Donnay, Karsten, and Gipp, Bela. “Automated Identification of Media Bias in News Articles: An Interdisciplinary Literature Review.” International Journal on Digital Libraries 20 (2019): 391–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, James T. All the News That’s Fit to Sell: How the Market Transforms Information Into News. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Harvey, Anna, and Mukherjee, Bumba. “The Evolution of Partisan Conventions, 1880–1940.” American Politics Research 34, no. 3 (2006): 368–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirano, Shigeo, and Snyder, James M., Jr. Primary Elections in the United States. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirano, Shigeo, and Snyder, James M., Jr. “Measuring the Partisan Behavior of U.S. Newspapers, 1880 to 1980.” Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2024-03-18. https://doi.org/10.3886/E198425V1
Google Scholar
Hiscox, Michael J. “The Magic Bullet? The RTAA, Institutional Reform, and Trade Liberalization.” International Organization 53, no. 4 (1999): 669–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, Jacob, Naidu, Suresh, Kaplan, Ethan, and Wilse-Samson, Laurence. “Political Polarization and Dynamics of Political Language: Evidence from 130 Years of Partisan Speech.” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity (2012): 1–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, Richard L. Politics and the American Press: The Rise of Objectivity, 1865–1920. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Kleppner, Paul. Continuity and Change in Electoral Politics, 1893–1928. New York: Greenwood Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Lacy, Stephen. “The Effect of Growth of Radio on Newspaper Competition, 1929–1948.” Journalism Quarterly 64, no. 4 (1987): 775–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larcinese, Valentino, Puglisi, Riccardo, and Snyder, James M., Jr. “Partisan Bias in Economic News: Evidence on the Agenda-Setting Behavior of US Newspapers.” Journal of Public Economics 95, no. 9–10 (2011): 1178–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawrence, David. “Reporting the Political News at Washington.” American Political Science Review 22, no. 4 (1928): 893–902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lazarsfeld, Paul Felix. Radio and the Printed Page; An Introduction to the Study of Radio and Its Role in the Communication of Ideas. New York: Duell, Sloan and Pearce, 1940.Google Scholar
Lee, Alfred M. The Daily Newspaper in America: The Evolution of a Social Instrument. New York: Macmillan Co, 1937.Google Scholar
McCarty, Nolan M., Poole, Keith T., and Rosenthal, Howard. Polarized America: The Dance of Ideology and Unequal Riches, Second Edition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2016.Google Scholar
McGerr, Michael E. The Decline of Popular Politics. New York: Oxford University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Mindich, David T. Z. Just the Facts: How “Objectivity” Came to Define American Journalism. New York: New York University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
O’Halloran, Sharyn. Politics, Process and American Trade Policy. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petrova, Maria. “Newspapers and Parties: How Advertising Revenues Created an Independent Press.” American Political Science Review 105, no. 4 (2011): 790–808.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poole, Keith T., and Rosenthal, Howard. Congress: A Political-Economic History of Roll Call Voting. New York: Oxford University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Puglisi, Riccardo, and Snyder, James M., Jr. “Newspaper Coverage of Political Scandals.” Journal of Politics 73, no. 3 (2011): 931–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Puglisi, Riccardo, and Snyder, James M., Jr. “Empirical Studies of Media.” In Handbook of Media Economics, volume 1, edited by Simon, P. Anderson, Waldfogel, Joel, and Strömberg, David, 647–67. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2015.Google Scholar
Ridout, Travis N. “Introduction.” In New Directions in Media and Politics, edited by Travis, N. Ridout, 1–5. New York: Routledge Press, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rusk, Jerrold G. “The Effect of the Australian Ballot on Split Ticket Voting: 1876–1908.” American Political Science Review 64 (1970): 1220–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rutenbeck, Jeffrey B. “Newspaper Trends in the 1870s: Proliferation, Popularization, and Political Independence.” Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 72, no. 2 (1995): 361–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schudson, Michael. Discovering the News: A Social History of American Newspapers. New York: Basic Books, 1978.Google Scholar
Schudson, Michael. “The Objectivity Norm in American Journalism.” Journalism 2, no. 2 (2001): 149–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaw, Donald L. “News Bias and the Telegraph: A Study of Historical Change.” Journalism Quarterly 44, no. 1 (1967): 3–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shor, Boris, and McCarty, Nolan. “The Ideological Mapping of American Legislatures.” American Political Science Review 105, no. 3 (2011): 530–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Song, B. K. “Did Television Reduce the Effect of Partisan Press on Electoral Politics?” American Politics Research 48, no. 1 (2020): 78–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stave, Bruce M. The New Deal and the Last Hurrah: Pittsburgh Machine Politics. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1970.Google Scholar
Strömberg, David. “Mass Media Competition, Political Competition, and Public Policy.” Review of Economic Studies 71, no. 1 (2004): 265–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trounstine, Jessica. Political Monopolies in American Cities: The Rise and Fall of Bosses and Reformers. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolfinger, Raymond E. “Why Political Machines Have Not Withered Away and Other Revisionist Thoughts.” Journal of Politics 34, no. 2 (1972): 365–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirano and Snyder Jr. supplementary material
Hirano and Snyder Jr. supplementary material
PDF
3.4 MB