Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of modified fixed dose four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate for warfarin reversal

  • Published:
Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Non-activated four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4 F-PCC) has emerged as the preferred reversal strategy for patients on warfarin with life-threatening bleeding. Current dosing recommendations for 4 F-PCC require pre-treatment international normalized ratio (INR) and bodyweight values, resulting in ordering and administration delays. Studies have shown that alternative dosing regimens are safe and efficacious. This retrospective, single-center, pre- and post-protocol analysis was conducted to assess the efficacy of a pharmacist driven modified fixed-dose 4 F-PCC regimen versus package insert weight- and INR-based dosing regimen for warfarin reversal. The primary outcome was achievement of INR less than two. Secondary outcomes included dose and cost of 4 F-PCC, a time analysis, incidence of concomitant vitamin K administration, and incidence of thrombosis within seven days of 4 F-PCC. There were 195 patients included in the analysis, with 74 in the pre-cohort and 121 in the post-cohort. Baseline characteristics were similar between cohorts with the most common indication for warfarin use being atrial fibrillation (48.6% versus 47.1%) and reversal being intracerebral hemorrhage (68.9% versus 43.0%). Achievement of the primary endpoint occurred in 92% versus 95% (p = 0.097) of patients. A statistically significant difference was seen between cohorts regarding median dose and cost of 4 F-PCC administered (p < 0.001). Eleven thromboembolic events occurred with three events in the pre-cohort and eight events in the post-cohort (p = 0.453). A fixed-dose of 1500IU of 4 F-PCC was effective in reversing INR to less than two in most patients regardless of reversal indication with minimal thrombotic risks.

Highlights

No consensus exists for the ideal dosing scheme for 4 F-PCC for warfarin reversal.

We describe our experience with a pharmacist driven modified-fixed dose 4 F-PCC protocol for warfarin reversal.

No difference in reversal of INR < 2 was seen between package-insert weight and INR based dosing compared to modified fixed-dose 4 F-PCC dosing for warfarin reversal.

Future research regarding to establish non-inferiority between fixed-dose and package-insert dosing is warranted.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Garcia D, Erkan D (2018) Diagnosis and management of the Antiphospholipid Syndrome. N Engl J Med 378(21):2010–2021. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra1705454

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Nishimura RA, Otto CM, Bonow RO et al (2017) 2017 AHA/ACC focused update of the 2014 AHA/ACC Guideline for the management of patients with Valvular Heart Disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice guidelines. Circulation 135(25):e1159–e1195. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000503

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Martin K, Beyer-Westendorf J, Davidson BL, Huisman MV, Sandset PM, Moll S (2016) Use of the direct oral anticoagulants in obese patients: guidance from the SSC of the ISTH. J Thromb Haemost 14(6):1308–1313. https://doi.org/10.1111/jth.13323

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Tomaselli GF, Mahaffey KW, Cuker A et al (2021) 2020 ACC Expert Consensus Decision Pathway on Management of Bleeding in Patients on Oral Anticoagulants: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Solution Set Oversight Committee [published correction appears in J Am Coll Cardiol. ;77(21):2760]. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;76(5):594–622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2020.04.053

  5. Lindh JD, Holm L, Dahl ML, Alfredsson L, Rane A (2008) Incidence and predictors of severe bleeding during warfarin treatment. J Thromb Thrombolysis 25(2):151–159. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11239-007-0048-2

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. KCentra [package insert] (2013) Marburg, Germany: CSL Behring GmbH

  7. Rhoney DH, Chester KW (2020) Optimal dosage and Administration Practices for Vitamin K Antagonist reversal with 4-Factor Prothrombin Complex Concentrate. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost 26:107602947474 Published 2020 Oct 14. https://doi.org/10.1177/1076029620947474

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Pabinger I, Brenner B, Kalina U et al (2008) Prothrombin complex concentrate (Beriplex P/N) for emergency anticoagulation reversal: a prospective multinational clinical trial. J Thromb Haemost 6(4):622–631. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1538-7836.2008.02904.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Klein L, Peters J, Miner J, Gorlin J (2015) Evaluation of fixed dose 4-factor prothrombin complex concentrate for emergent warfarin reversal. Am J Emerg Med 33(9):1213–1218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2015.05.017

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Astrup G, Sarangarm P, Burnett A (2018) Fixed dose 4-factor prothrombin complex concentrate for the emergent reversal of warfarin: a retrospective analysis. J Thromb Thrombolysis 45(2):300–305. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11239-017-1586-x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gilbert BW, Morton L, Huffman JB et al (2020) Modified version of the American College of Cardiology’s recommendation for low-dose prothrombin complex concentrate is effective for warfarin reversal. Am J Emerg Med 38(4):806–809. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2019.12.005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Fuh L, Goldstein JN, Hayes BD (2020) Initiation of a fixed-dose four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate protocol. J Thromb Thrombolysis 50(1):217–220. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11239-019-01984-w

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Frontera JA, Lewin JJ 3rd, Rabinstein AA et al (2016) Guideline for reversal of Antithrombotics in Intracranial Hemorrhage: A Statement for Healthcare professionals from the Neurocritical Care Society and Society of Critical Care Medicine. Neurocrit Care 24(1):6–46

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

MEP designed the study, collected and interpreted the data, and drafted the manuscript. MJ, SB, and CM contributed to interpretation of the data and critically revised the manuscript for important intellectual content. All authors approved the final version to be published and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work is appropriately investigated and resolved. All authors have reviewed and approved this manuscript prior to submission for publication.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Meghan E. Peterson.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

IRB-approved.

Declaration of competing interest

s: MEP, SB, MJ, and CM have no relevant conflicts of interest to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Peterson, M.E., Jaynes, M.P., Berardi, S. et al. Evaluation of modified fixed dose four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate for warfarin reversal. J Thromb Thrombolysis (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11239-024-02969-0

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11239-024-02969-0

Keywords

Navigation