Abstract
In the research of flocking control algorithm with obstacle avoidance, the constraints of obstacle information, shape and boundary limit their practical applications. To relax these constraints, we assume that the agent can only perceive the position of static obstacle boundary points within its sensing radius, and propose a virtual-leader split/rejoin-based flocking control algorithm with obstacle avoidance. In this algorithm, the virtual-leader is divided into target virtual-leader and bypass virtual-leader, the bypass virtual-leader is designed to lead the agent to move along the boundary of static obstacles, and the target virtual-leader is designed to lead multi-agents split by static obstacles perturbation to re-aggregate and realize the group objective following. Additionally, the position cooperation term is designed to realize the separation and aggregation between agents and between the agent and static obstacle boundary points, and the velocity consensus term is designed to realize velocity matching. Then, the sufficient conditions that the agent does not collide are demonstrated. Finally, it is further verified by simulations that the proposed algorithm can relax the constraints of obstacle shape and boundary, and achieve better environmental adaptability.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
T. Z. Muslimov and R. A. Munasypov, “Adaptive decentralized flocking control of multi-UAV circular formations based on vector fields and backstepping,” ISA Transactions, vol. 107, pp. 143–159, 2020.
G. Vásárhelyi, C. Virágh, G. Somorjai, T. Nepusz, A. E. Eiben, and T. Vicsek, “Optimized flocking of autonomous drones in confined environments,” Science Robotics, vol. 3, no. 20, pp. 1–13, 2018.
Y. N. Jia and L. Wang, “Leader-follower flocking of multiple robotic fish,” IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 1372–1383, 2015.
E. Faraji, A. R. Abbasi, S. Nejatian, M. zadehbagheri, and H. Parvin, “Probabilistic planning of the active and reactive power sources constrained to securable-reliable operation in reconfigurable smart distribution networks,” Electric Power Systems Research, vol. 199, pp. 1–13, 2021.
A. Kavousi-Fard, S. Abbasi, A. Abbasi, and S. Tabatabaie, “Optimal probabilistic reconfiguration of smart distribution grids considering penetration of plug-in hybrid electric vehicles,” Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 1847–1855, 2015.
A. Davoodi, A. R. Abbasi, and S. Nejatian, “Multi-objective dynamic generation and transmission expansion planning considering capacitor bank allocation and demand response program constrained to flexible-securable clean energy,” Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, vol. 47, pp. 1–13, 2021.
C. W. Reynolds, “Flocks, herds, and schools: a distributed behavioral model,” ACM SIGGRAPH Computer Graphics, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 25–34, 1987.
H. X. Qiu and H. B. Duan, “Pigeon interaction mode switch-based UAV distributed flocking control under obstacle environments,” ISA Transactions, vol. 71, no. 1, pp. 93–102, 2017.
Z. H. Peng, L. Liu, and J. Wang, “Output-feedback flocking control of multiple autonomous surface vehicles based on data-driven adaptive extended state observers,” IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, vol. 51, no. 9, pp. 4611–4622, 2021.
T. R. Yan, X. Xu, Z. Y. Li, and E. Li, “Flocking of multiagent system with dynamic topology by pinning control,” IET Control Theory & Applications, vol. 14, no. 20, pp. 3374–3381, 2020.
S. Ghapani, J. Mei, W. Ren, and Y. D. Song, “Fully distributed flocking with a moving leader for lagrange networks with parametric uncertainties,” Automatica, vol. 67, pp. 67–76, 2016.
W. Liu and Z. J. Gao, “A distributed flocking control strategy for UAV groups,” Computer Communications, vol. 153, pp. 95–101, 2020.
J. Zhou, D. B. Zeng, and X. B. Lu, “Multi-agent trajectory-tracking flexible formation via generalized flocking and leader-average sliding mode control,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 36089–36099, 2020.
T. R. Yan, X. Xu, Z. Y. Li, and E. Li, “Flocking of multi-agent systems with unknown nonlinear dynamics and heterogeneous virtual leader,” International Journal of Control, Automation, and Systems, vol. 19, no. 9, pp. 2931–2939, 2021.
S. Yazdani and H. S. Su, “A fully distributed protocol for flocking of time-varying linear systems with dynamic leader and external disturbance,” IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics Systems, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 1234–1242, 2022.
S. Yazdani and M. Haeri, “Robust adaptive fault-tolerant control for leader-follower flocking of uncertain multi-agent systems with actuator failure,” ISA Transactions, vol. 71, no. 2, pp. 227–234, 2017.
S. M. A. Pahnehkolaei, A. Alfi, and H. Modares, “Robust inverse optimal cooperative control for uncertain linear multiagent systems,” IEEE Systems Journal, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 2355–2366, 2021.
Y. Zou, Q. An, S. X. Miao, S. M. Chen, X. M. Wang, and H. S. Su, “Flocking of uncertain nonlinear multi-agent systems via distributed adaptive event-triggered control,” Neurocomputing, vol. 465, pp. 503–513, 2021.
J. Velagić, L. Vuković, and B. Ibrahimović, “Mobile robot motion framework based on enhanced robust panel method,” International Journal of Control, Automation, and Systems, vol. 18, pp. 1264–1276, 2020.
D. Bhattacharjee, A. Chakravarthy, and K. Subbarao, “Nonlinear model predictive control and collision-cone-based missile guidance algorithm,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, vol. 44, no. 8, pp. 1481–1497, 2021.
M. Fuad, T. Agustinah, and D. Purwanto, “Modified headed social force model based on hybrid velocity obstacles for mobile robot to avoid disturbed groups of pedestrians,” International Journal of Intelligent Engineering and Systems, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 222–241, 2021.
D. Seo, and J. Kang, “Collision-avoided tracking control of UAV using velocity-adaptive 3D local path planning,” International Journal of Control, Automation, and Systems, vol. 21, pp. 231–243, 2023.
J. T. Qi, L. Bai, Y. D. Xiao, Y. M. Wei, and W. S. Wu, “The emergence of collective obstacle avoidance based on a visual perception mechanism,” Information Sciences, vol. 582, pp. 850–864, 2022.
A. D. Dang, H. M. La, T. Nguyen, and J. Horm, “Formation control for autonomous robots with collision and obstacle avoidance using a rotational and repulsive force-based approach,” International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 1–16, 2019.
S. Nath, M. Baishya, and D. Ghose, “Decentralised coverage of a large structure using flocking of autonomous agents having a dynamic hierarchy model,” Autonomous Robots, vol. 46, pp. 617–643, 2022.
R. Olfati-Saber, “Flocking for multi-agent dynamic systems: algorithms and theory,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 401–420, 2006.
J. J. Li, W. Zhang, H. S. Su, and Y. P. Yang, “Flocking of partially-informed multi-agent systems avoiding obstacles with arbitrary shape,” Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 943–972, 2015.
D. Sakai, H. Fukushima, and F. Matsuno, “Flocking for multirobots without distinguishing robots and obstacles,” IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 1019–1027, 2016.
R. B. Grando, J. C. de Jesus, V. A. Kich, A. H. Kolling, and P. L. J. Drews-Jr, “Double critic deep reinforcement learning for mapless 3D navigation of unmanned aerial vehicles,” Journal of Intelligent and Robotic Systems, vol. 104, no. 29, pp. 1–14, 2022.
K. Taylor and S. M. LaValle, “Intensity-based navigation with global guarantees,” Autonomous Robots, vol. 36, pp. 349–364, 2014.
C. Ntakolia, S. Moustakidis, and A. Siouras, “Autonomous path planning with obstacle avoidance for smart assistive systems,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 213, pp. 1–18, 2023.
K. N. McGuire, G. C. H. E. de Croon, and K. Tuyls, “A comparative study of bug algorithms for robot navigation,” Robotics and Autonomous Systems, vol. 121, pp. 1–17, 2019.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
The authors declare that there is no competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
This work is supposed by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (62161007 and 62061010), Foundation from the Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region (AA20302022, AB21196041, AB22035074 and AD22080061), Guangxi Key Laboratory of Precision Navigation Technology and Application (DH202207 and DH202215), and Young Teachers Promotion Project of Guangxi Universities (2022KY0181).
Jianhui Wu received his Ph.D. degree in traffic information engineering and control from Changsha University of Science and Technology, China in 2019. His research interests include satellite navigation, system control, and system optimization.
Yuanfa Ji received his Ph.D. degree in astronomical technology and methods from National Astronomical Observatories, CAS, China in 2008. His research interests include satellite navigation, signal processing, and system control.
Xiyan Sun received her Ph.D. degree in astronomical technology and methods from National Astronomical Observatories, CAS, China in 2006. Her research interests include satellite navigation, signal processing, and system control.
Weibin Liang received his M.E. degree in electronics and communication engineering from Guilin University of Electronic Technology, China in 2020. His research interests include satellite navigation, visual navigation, signal processing, and system control.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wu, J., Ji, Y., Sun, X. et al. Virtual-leader Split/Rejoin-based Flocking Control With Obstacle Avoidance for Multi-agents. Int. J. Control Autom. Syst. (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12555-022-0950-6
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12555-022-0950-6