Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Multi-objective Grey Wolf Optimization based self configuring wireless sensor network

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Wireless Networks Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Wireless Sensor Networks are essential for monitoring physical objects in smart systems powered by the Internet of Things. It gathers information by detecting the surroundings and transmits it to a central repository. In this study, an unknown domain was explored using multi-objective optimization. This proposed work employs Multi-objective Grey Wolf Optimization to form effective clustering among nodes and also for choosing the cluster head. Based on the multi-objective fitness function, the cluster heads are selected. For every iteration, the cluster heads are changed thereby saving the consumption of energy and also resulting in an increase in network lifespan. The suggested method divides the network into various optimal-sized clusters and chooses the best cluster heads. The performance of the multi-objective exploration is presented. The proposed method`s key contributions are by utilizing MOGWO for efficient clustering and CH selection, ultimately enhancing network performance. It dynamically adjusts CHs, resulting in energy savings and an extended network lifespan. MOGWO takes into account multiple objectives simultaneously. Through network configuration optimization, MOGWO enhances resource utilization, resulting in lower energy consumption, extended network lifetime, and improved overall efficiency.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Algorithm 1
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Khalaf, O. I., & Sabbar, B. M. (2019). An overview on wireless sensor networks and finding optimal location of nodes. Periodicals of Engineering and Natural Sciences (PEN), 7(3), 1096–1101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. El Alami, H., & Najid, A. (2019). ECH: An enhanced clustering hierarchy approach to maximize lifetime of wireless sensor networks. IEEE Access, 7(1–1), 107142–107153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ketshabetswe, L. K., Zungeru, A. M., Mangwala, M., Chuma, J. M., & Sigweni, B. (2019). Communication protocols for wireless sensor networks: A survey and comparison. Heliyon, 5(5), 1–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Khediri, S. E., Fakhet, W., Moulahi, T., Khan, R., Thaljaoui, A., & Kachouri, A. (2020). Improved node localization using K-means clustering for wireless sensor networks. Computer Science Review, 37(3), 100284.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Shi, J., & Sha, M. (2019). Parameter self-configuration and self-adaptation in industrial wireless sensor-actuator networks. IEEE INFOCOM 2019-IEEE conference on computer communications, pp 658–666, 10.1109/ INFOCOM.2019.8737467.

  6. Arora, A., & Zhang, H. (2006). LSRP: Local stabilization in shortest path routing. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, 14(3), 520–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lee, H., Ryu, J., Kim, K., & Han, K. (2006). A density based self-configuration scheme in wireless sensor networks. Advanced web and network technologies, and applications, lecture notes in computer science, 3842, 350–359, https://doi.org/10.1007/11610496_47

  8. Wan, J., Chen, W., Xu, X., & Fang, M. (2008). An efficient self-healing scheme for wireless sensor networks. International conference on future generation communication and networking, 1 https://doi.org/10.1109/FGCN. 2008.138

  9. Li, N., Liu, Y., Shi, Q., Wang, S., & Zou, K. (2021). Multi objective particle swarm optimization based on cosine distance mechanism and game strategy. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, 2021, 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Sun, Y., & Gao, Y. (2019). A multi-objective particle swarm optimization algorithm based on gaussian mutation and an improved learning strategy. Mathematics, 7(2), 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Zhou, A., Qu, B. Y., Li, H., Zhao, S. Z., Suganthan, P. N., & Zhang, Q. (2011). Multi objective evolutionary algorithms: A survey of the state of the art. Swarm and Evolutionary Computation, 1(1), 32–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Parsopoulos, K.E., & Vrahatis, M.N. (2002). Particle swarm optimization method in multi objective problems. In: Proceedings of the 2002 ACM symposium on applied computing, pp 603–607.

  13. Zhang, Y., Cheng, S., Shi, Y., Gong, D. W., & Zhao, X. (2019). Cost-sensitive feature selection using two-archive multi-objective artificial bee colony algorithm. Expert System with Applications, 137(4), 46–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lin, J., Ding, X., Li, H., & Zhou, J. (2020). Bilevel programming model and algorithms for flight gate assignment problem. The Aeronautical Journal, 124(1281), 1667–1682.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kolak, O. I., Feyzioglu, O., & Noyan, N. (2018). Bi-level multi-objective traffic network optimisation with sustainability perspective. Expert System with Applications, 104, 294–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. NavinDhinnesh, A. D. C., & Sabapathi, T. (2022). Probabilistic neural network based efficient bandwidth allocation in wireless sensor networks. J Ambient Intell Human Comput., 13, 2001–2012. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-021-02961-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Dhinnesh, A. D. C. N., & Sundareswaran, N. (2022). An efficient self-healing network through quadratic probing optimization mechanism. International Journal of Communication Systems, 35(7), e5098. https://doi.org/10.1002/dac.5098

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Xiwang, G., Zhiwei, Z., Liang, Q., Shixin, L., Ying, T., & Ziyan, Z. (2022). Stochastic hybrid discrete grey wolf optimizer for multi-objective disassembly sequencing and line balancing planning in disassembling multiple products. IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering., 19, 3.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Nur, L. S. A., & Helmi, M. D. R. (2022). Population initialization factor in binary multi-objective grey wolf optimization for features selection. IEEE Access., 10, 114942–114958.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Sayed, M. H., Amir, S., Amir, M. R., & Mahdi, B. (2022). GWO-SA: Gray wolf optimization algorithm for service activation management in fog computing. IEEE Access., 10, 107846–107863.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Muhammad, I. A., Syed, A. A. K., Omar, A., Zafar, A. K., Abdullah, A., & Malik, M. M. (2022). A novel hybrid optimization-based algorithm for the single and multi-objective achievement with optimal dg allocations in distribution Networks. IEEE Power & Energy Society Section. IEEE Access, 10, 25669–25687.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Nima, K., Laith, A., El-Sayed, M.-K., Vaclav, S., & Seyedali, M. (2022). An archive-based multi-objective arithmetic optimization algorithm for solving industrial engineering problems. IEEE Access, 10, 106673–106698.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Asad, A., Farhan, A., Muhammad, F. K., Muazzam, M., & Sangsoon, L. (2023). Harris hawks optimization-based clustering algorithm for vehicular Ad-Hoc networks. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems., 24, 6.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Jannat, U. A. B. W. A., Syed, A. A. K., Abdullah, A., Zafar, A. K., Omar, A., & Muhammad, M. M. (2022). Smart energy management in virtual power plant paradigm with a new improved multilevel optimization based approach. IEEE Access., 10, 50062–50077.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Jeffrey, O. A., Absalom, E. E., & Laith, A. (2023). Gazelle optimization algorithm: A novel nature-inspired metaheuristic optimizer. Neural Computing and Applications, 35, 4099–4131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Gang, H., Yixuan, Z., Laith, A., & Abdelazim, G. H. (2023). DETDO: An adaptive hybrid dandelion optimizer for engineering optimization. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 57, 1–36.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Zare, M., Ghasemi, M., Zahedi, A., et al. (2023). A global best-guided firefly algorithm for engineering problems. Journal of Bionic Engineering., 20, 2359–2388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Laith, A., Serdar, E., Davut, I., & Raed, A. Z. (2023). Modified elite opposition-based artificial hummingbird algorithm for designing FOPID controlled cruise control system. Intelligent Automation and Soft Computing. https://doi.org/10.32604/iasc.2023.040291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Ezugwu, A. E., Agushaka, J. O., Abualigah, L., et al. (2022). Prairie dog optimization algorithm. Neural Computing & Applications., 34, 20017–20065.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Jeffrey, O. A., Absalom, E. E., & Laith, A. (2022). Dwarf mongoose optimization algorithm. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering., 391, 1–38.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  31. Ahmadi, R., Ekbatanifard, G., & Bayat, P. (2021). A modified grey wolf optimizer based data clustering algorithm. Applied Artificial Intelligence, 35(1), 63–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Ojha, A., & Chanak, P. (2021). Multi-objective gray wolf optimization-based data routing scheme for wireless sensor networks. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 9(6), 4615–4623. https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2021.3105425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Albina, K., Sergey, N., Dianwei, Q., & Suk, G. L. (2019). Multi-robot exploration based on multi-objective grey wolf optimizer. Applied Sciences, 9, 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the support and encouragement given by the Management, Principal, Director of Computer Applications, Senior Professor and Head, Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, toward this work

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Computer Applications, Mepco Schlenk Engineering College, Sivakasi, Tamilnadu, India

    A. D. C. Navin Dhinnesh

  2. Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Mepco Schlenk Engineering College, Sivakasi, Tamilnadu, India

    T. Sabapathi

Authors
  1. A. D. C. Navin Dhinnesh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. T. Sabapathi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. D. C. Navin Dhinnesh.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Navin Dhinnesh, A.D.C., Sabapathi, T. Multi-objective Grey Wolf Optimization based self configuring wireless sensor network. Wireless Netw (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-024-03732-2

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-024-03732-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation