Skip to main content
Log in

Hydrodynamic analysis of oscillating water column in the presence of seabed undulations

  • Original article
  • Published:
Journal of Marine Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present numerical investigation evaluates the significance of seabed undulations on the efficiency of an oscillating water column (OWC) device. The proposed physical problem is formulated in a two-dimensional Cartesian coordinate system under the framework of linearized potential flow theory. The numerical model based on the dual-boundary integral equation method (DBEM) is employed to solve the boundary value problem (BVP), and the study presents the hydrodynamic coefficients of the OWC device in the presence of a composite wavy seabed. Various effects such as the effect of seabed undulations, OWC configuration, chamber spacing, partial rotation of lip-wall, and lip-wall draft on the system radiation coefficients (i.e., wave energy capturing efficiency, radiation susceptance, and conductance) and wall force coefficient is presented against the relative wave frequency. The numerical results indicate that the efficiency of OWC is a trivariate function, which depends upon incident wave frequency, lip-wall rotation, and chamber spacing. The comparative study between various types of OWC devices (i.e., lip-wall configurations) is reported against relative wave frequency in the presence of bottom undulations. The peak performance of OWC is plausible using the resonance mechanism concept when the chamber spacing is moderate and lip-wall is either seaside horizontal or seaside partially inclined.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Soares CG, Bento AR, Gonçalves M, Silva D, Martinho P (2014) Numerical evaluation of the wave energy resource along the Atlantic European coast. Comput Geosci 71:37–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Falcão AFDO (2010) Wave energy utilization: a review of the technologies. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 14(3):899–918

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Suzuki M, Arakawa C and Takahashi S (2004) Performance of wave power generating system installed in breakwater at Sakata port in Japan. In the Fourteenth International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference. OnePetro. 2004.

  4. Falcão ADO (2000) The shoreline OWC wave power plant at the Azores. In Proceedings of 4th European Wave Energy Conference (pp 42–47)

  5. Heath T, Whittaker TJ and Boake CB (2001) The design, construction and operation of the LIMPET wave energy converter (Islay, Scotland) [Land Installed Marine Powered Energy Transformer]

  6. Falcão AF, Henriques JC (2016) Oscillating-water-column wave energy converters and air turbines: a review. Renew Energy 85:1391–1424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Heath TV (2012) A review of oscillating water columns. Philos Trans R Soc 370(1959):235–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Aderinto T, Li H (2018) Ocean wave energy converters: status and challenges. Energies 11(5):1250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Medina-López E, Bergillos RJ, Moñino A, Clavero M, Ortega-Sánchez M (2017) Effects of seabed morphology on oscillating water column wave energy converters. Energy 135:659–673

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Boccotti P (2003) On a new wave energy absorber. Ocean Eng 30(9):1191–1200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Brito-Melo A, Gato LMC, Sarmento AJNA (2002) Analysis of Wells turbine design parameters by numerical simulation of the OWC performance. Ocean Eng 29(12):1463–1477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Evans DV, Porter R (1995) Hydrodynamic characteristics of an oscillating water column device. Appl Ocean Res 17(3):155–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. He F, Huang Z (2014) Hydrodynamic performance of pile-supported OWC-type structures as breakwaters: an experimental study. Ocean Eng 88:618–626

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Malara G, Arena F (2013) Analytical modelling of an U-Oscillating Water Column and performance in random waves. Renew Energy 60:116–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Deng Z, Ou Z, Ren X, Zhang D, Si Y (2020) Theoretical analysis of an asymmetric offshore-stationary oscillating water column device with bottom plate. J Waterw Port Coast Ocean Eng 146(4):04020013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Howe D, Nader JR, Macfarlane G (2020) Performance analysis of a floating breakwater integrated with multiple oscillating water column wave energy converters in regular and irregular seas. Appl Ocean Res 99:102147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Khan MB, Behera H (2021) Impact of sloping porous seabed on the efficiency of an OWC against oblique waves. Renew Energy 173:1027–1039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Naik N, Zheng S, Behera H (2023) Role of dual breakwaters and trenches on efficiency of an oscillating water column. Phys Fluids 35(4):047115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Deng Z, Wang C, Yao Y, Higuera P (2020) Numerical simulation of an oscillating water column device installed over a submerged breakwater. J Mar Sci Technol 25:258–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Gadelho JFM, Rezanejad K, Xu S, Hinostroza M, Soares CG (2021) Experimental study on the motions of a dual chamber floating oscillating water column device. Renew Energy 170:1257–1274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Haghighi AT, Nikseresht AH, Hayati M (2021) Numerical analysis of hydrodynamic performance of a dual-chamber oscillating water column. Energy 221:119892

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ning D, Zhou Y, Zhang C (2018) Hydrodynamic modeling of a novel dual-chamber OWC wave energy converter. Appl Ocean Res 78:180–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Wang C, Zhang Y, Deng Z (2021) Theoretical analysis on hydrodynamic performance for a dual-chamber oscillating water column device with a pitching front lip-wall. Energy 226:120326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Wang C, Zhang Y (2022) Performance enhancement for a dual-chamber OWC conceived from side wall effects in narrow flumes. Ocean Eng 247:110552

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Wang C, Zhang Y, Deng Z (2021) Semi-analytical study on the wave power extraction of a bottom-seated oscillating water column device with a pitching front lip-wall. J Fluids Struct 105:103350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Konispoliatis DN (2023) Assessment of the hydrodynamic performance of an Oscillating Water Column device in front of a V-shaped vertical wall. J Offshore Mech Arct Eng 145(5):052001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Cui L, Zheng S, Zhang Y, Miles J, Iglesias G (2021) Wave power extraction from a hybrid oscillating water column-oscillating buoy wave energy converter. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 135:110234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Lee KR, Koo W, Kim MH (2013) Fully nonlinear time-domain simulation of a backward bent duct buoy floating wave energy converter using an acceleration potential method. Int J Naval Architect Ocean Eng 5(4):513–528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Rezanejad K, Bhattacharjee J, Soares CG (2013) Stepped sea bottom effects on the efficiency of nearshore oscillating water column device. Ocean Eng 70:25–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Rezanejad K, Bhattacharjee J, Guedes Soares C (2016) Analytical and numerical study of nearshore multiple oscillating water columns. J Offshore Mech Arctic Eng. DOI 10(1115/1):4032303

    Google Scholar 

  31. Ning DZ, Ke S, Mayon R, Zhang C (2019) Numerical investigation on hydrodynamic performance of an OWC wave energy device in the stepped bottom. Front Energy Res 7:152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Ning DZ, Shi J, Zou QP, Teng B (2015) Investigation of hydrodynamic performance of an OWC (oscillating water column) wave energy device using a fully nonlinear HOBEM (higher-order boundary element method). Energy 83:177–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Koley S, Trivedi K (2020) Mathematical modeling of oscillating water column wave energy converter devices over the undulated sea bed. Eng Anal Boundary Elem 117:26–40

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  34. Trivedi K, Koley S (2022) Hydrodynamic performance of the dual-chamber oscillating water column device placed over the undulated sea bed. Energy Rep 8:480–486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Liu Y, Li H-J (2017) Iterative multi-domain bem solution for water wave reflection by perforated caisson breakwaters. Eng Anal Boundary Elem 77:70–80

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  36. Vijay KG, Venkateswarlu V, Karmakar D (2020) Scattering of gravity waves by multiple submerged rubble-mound breakwaters. Arab J Sci Eng 45(10):8529–8550

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Vijay KG, Venkateswarlu V, Sahoo T (2021) Bragg scattering of surface gravity waves by an array of submerged breakwaters and a floating dock. Wave Motion 106:102807

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  38. Yu X, Chwang AT (1994) Water waves above submerged porous plate. J Eng Mech 120(6):1270–1282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Yueh CY, Chuang S-H (2012) A boundary element model for a partially piston-type porous wave energy converter in gravity waves. Eng Anal Boundary Elem 36(5):658–664

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  40. Chen JT, Hong H-K, Chyuan S (1994) Boundary element analysis and design in seepage problems using dual integral formulation. Finite Elem Anal Des 17(1):1–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Chen K-H, Chen J-T, Lin S-Y, Lee Y-T (2004) Dual boundary element analysis of normal incident wave passing a thin submerged breakwater with rigid, absorbing, and permeable boundaries. J Waterw Port Coast Ocean Eng 130(4):179–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Chen J-T, Yueh C-Y, Chang Y-L, Wen C-C (2017) Why dual boundary element method is necessary? Eng Anal Boundary Elem 76:59–68

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  43. Hong HK, Chen JT (1988) Derivations of integral equations of elasticity. J Eng Mech 114(6):1028–1044

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Zhao Y, Liu Y, Li HJ, Chang AT (2020) Iterative dual BEM solution for water wave scattering by breakwaters having perforated thin plates. Eng Anal Boundary Elem 120:95–106

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  45. Yueh CY, Chuang SH, Wen CC (2016) Wave scattering by submerged composite wavy plate breakwaters using a dual BEM. Ocean Eng 124:192–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Vijay KG, Nishad CS, Neelamani S, Sahoo T (2021) Wave interaction with multiple wavy porous barriers using dual boundary element method. Eng Anal Boundary Elem 122:176–189

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  47. Panduranga K, Koley S (2021) Water waves scattering by cylindrical dual porous floating breakwaters connected with a rectangular porous box and floating over an undulated seabed. Meccanica 56(12):3001–3024

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  48. Evans DV (1982) Wave-power absorption by systems of oscillating surface pressure distributions. J Fluid Mech 114:481–499

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  49. Yueh CY, Tsaur DH (1999) Wave scattering by submerged vertical plate-type breakwater using composite BEM. Coast Eng J 41(1):65–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Morris-Thomas MT, Irvin RJ, Thiagarajan KP (2007) An investigation into the hydrodynamic efficiency of an oscillating water column. J Offshore Mech Arctic Eng 129(4):273–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Zhang Y, Zou QP, Greaves D (2012) Air–water two-phase flow modelling of hydrodynamic performance of an oscillating water column device. Renew Energy 41:159–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Panduranga K, Koley S, Sahoo T (2021) Surface gravity wave scattering by multiple slatted screens placed near a caisson porous breakwater in the presence of seabed undulations. Appl Ocean Res 111:102675

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Tan L, Tang GQ, Zhou ZB, Cheng L, Chen X, Lu L (2017) Theoretical and numerical investigations of wave resonance between two floating bodies in close proximity. J Hydrodyn 29(5):805–816

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

KGV acknowledges the support received from the Naval Research Board (NRB), Ministry of Defence, Govt. of India through award No. NRB/512/MAR/23-24.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Srinu: Conceptualization, Methodology, MATLAB coding and Investigation. Venkateswarlu: Data Curation, Original Draft Preparation, and Investigation. Vijay: Conceptualization, Methodology, MATLAB coding, Investigation and Supervision. Atmanand: Investigation and Supervision.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. G. Vijay.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Srinu, D., Venkateswarlu, V., Vijay, K.G. et al. Hydrodynamic analysis of oscillating water column in the presence of seabed undulations. J Mar Sci Technol (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00773-024-00994-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00773-024-00994-5

Keywords

Navigation