Abstract
Backgrounds
Relay intercropping maize yields are comparable to sole cropping maize yields, but mechanism explanations and studies based on plant morphology, source-sink relationships and leaf photosynthesis physiological perspectives are unclear.
Methods
The experiments was conducted in a two-factor randomized block design, including two different maize varieties (A1: RongYu 1210 (RY1210), A2: ZhongWangYu 18(ZWY18)) and two plant pattern (B1: Relay intercropping (RI), B2: sole cropping (SC)).
Results
The net photosynthetic rate (Pn) of A1B1 wide row (WR) was increased by 6.95% and 10.78% compared to A1B2, respectively. Chlb and Chl(a + b) of A1B1 WR were no significant difference from A1B2. Average dry matter accumulation in ear of A1B1 was significantly lower than that of A1B2 by 9.77%. When 13CO2 labeling the WR of ear leaves, the abundance of 13CO2 in the ear of A1B1 WR was significantly increased by 0.75% and 150% compared to A2B1 WR in the ear and ear leaves, respectively. Silking stage, the thickness of upper and lower epidermis and leaf thickness of A1B1 significantly increased by 10.70%, 5.82% and 1.77% compared to A2B1. The average yield of A1B1 was 8344.13 kg ha−1, which was no significant difference compared to A1B2.
Conclusions
It was attributed mainly to increase the Pn of WR maize, which increased the 13CO2 abundance of WR ear leaves, leaf epidermal thickness and photosynthetic leaf area, and facilitated the transfer of photosynthetic assimilated products to the seeds, which guaranteed stable yields of A1B1.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The datasets generated during and /or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Abbreviations
- RY 1210:
-
RongYu 1210
- ZWY 18:
-
ZhongWangYu 18
- NR:
-
Narrow Rows
- WR:
-
Wide Rows
- Pn :
-
Net photosynthetic rate
- Gs :
-
Stomatal conductivity
- Ci :
-
Intercellular CO2 concentrations
- Tr :
-
Transpiration rate
- RI:
-
Relay intercropping
References
Abeledo LG, Savin R, Slafer GA (2020) Maize senescence under contrasting source-sink ratios during the grain filling period. Environ Exp Bot 180:104263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2020.104263
Allen JF, Forsberg J (2001) Molecular recognition in thylakoid structure and function. Trends in plant sci 6:317–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1360-1385(01)02010-6
Amanullah (2015) Specific leaf area and specific leaf weight in small grain crops wheat, rye, barley, and oats differ at various growth stages and NPK source. J Plant Nutrition 38:1694–1708. https://doi.org/10.1080/01904167.2015.1017051
Ayre BG (2011) Membrane-transport systems for sucrose in relation to whole-plant carbon partitioning. Mol Plant 4:377–394. https://doi.org/10.1093/mp/ssr014
Bernhard BJ, Below FE (2020) Plant population and row spacing effects on corn: phenotypic traits of positive yield-responsive hybrids. Agron J 112:1589–1600. https://doi.org/10.1002/agj2.20206
Chen G, Chen H, Shi K, Raza MA, Bawa G, Sun X, Pu T, Yong T, Liu W, Liu J, Du JB, Yang F, Yang WY, Wang XC (2020) Heterogeneous light conditions reduce the assimilate translocation towards maize ears. Plants 9:987. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9080987
Chen G, Liu M, Zhao X, Bawa G, Liang B, Feng L, Pu T, Yong TW, Liu WG, Liu J, Du JB, Yang F, Wu YS, Liu CY, Wang XC, Yang WY (2023) Improved photosynthetic performance under unilateral weak light conditions in a wide–narrow-row intercropping system is associated with altered sugar transport. J Exp Bot 2023:erad370. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erad370
Farooq M, Hussain M, Ul-Allah S, Siddique KH (2019) Physiological and agronomic approaches for improving water-use efficiency in crop plants. Agric Water Manag 219:95–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2019.04.010
Feng LY, Raza MA, Chen YK, Khalid MHB, Meraj TA, Ahsan F, Fan YF, Du JB, Wu XL, Song C, Liu CY, Bawa G, Zhang ZW, Yuan S, Yang F, Yang WY (2019) Narrow-wide row planting pattern improves the light environment and seed yields of intercrop species in relay intercropping system. PLoS One 14:e0212885. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0212885
Feng LY, Raza MA, Shi J, Ansar M, Titriku JK, Meraj TA, Shah GA, Ahmed Z, Saleem A, Liu WG, Wang XC, Yong TW, Yuan S, Yang F, Yang WY (2020) Delayed maize leaf senescence increases the land equivalent ratio of maize soybean relay intercropping system. Eur J Agron 118:126092. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2020.126092
Feng L, Tang HY, Pu T, Chen GP, Liang B, Yang WY, Wang XC (2022a) Maize–soybean intercropping: a bibliometric analysis of 30 years of research publications. Agron J 114:3377–3388. https://doi.org/10.1002/agj2.21186
Feng L, Yang WT, Tang HY, Huang GQ, Wang SB (2022b) Bandwidth row ratio configuration affect interspecific effects and land productivity in maize–soybean intercropping system. Agronomy 12:3095. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12123095
Feng YQ, Li YJ, Zhao YY, Shi HZ (2023) Physiological, transcriptome and co-expression network analysis of chlorophyll-deficient mutants in flue-cured tobacco. BMC Plant Bio 23:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-023-04169-z
Filartiga AL, Klimeš A, Altman J, Nobis MP, Crivellaro A, Schweingruber F, Doležal J (2022) Comparative anatomy of leaf petioles in temperate trees and shrubs: the role of plant size, environment and phylogeny. Annals Bot 129:567–582. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcac014
Jobe TO, Zenzen I, Rahimzadeh Karvansara P, Kopriva S (2019) Integration of sulfate assimilation with carbon and nitrogen metabolism in transition from C3 to C4 photosynthesis. J Exp Bot 70:4211–4221. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erz250
LaPlante G, Andrekovic S, Young RG, Kelly JM, Bennett N, Currie EJ, Hanner RH (2021) Canadian greenhouse operations and their potential to enhance domestic food security. Agronomy 11:1229. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11061229
Lemaire G, Van Oosterom E, Sheehy J, Jeuffroy MH, Massignam A, Rossato L (2007) Is crop N demand more closely related to dry matter accumulation or leaf area expansion during vegetative growth? Field Crop Res 100:91–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2006.05.009
Li L, Sun J, Zhang FS, Li XL, Yang SC, Rengel Z (2001) Wheat/maize or wheat/soybean strip intercropping: I. Yield advantage and interspecific interactions on nutrients. Field Crop Res 71:123–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4290(01)00156-3
Li YJ, Ma LS, Wu PT, Zhao XN, Chen XL, Gao XD (2022) Impacts of interspecific interactions on crop growth and yield in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)/maize (Zea mays L.) strip intercropping under different water and nitrogen levels. Agronomy 12:951. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12040951
Liang B, Ma Y, Shi K, Chen G, Chen H, Hu Y, Chen P, Pu T, Wu YS, Sun X, Yong TW, Liu WG, Liu J, Du JB, Yang F, Wang XC, Yang WY (2023) Appropriate bandwidth achieves a high yield by reducing maize intraspecific competition in additive maize–soybean strip intercropping. Eur J Agron 142:126658. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2022.126658
Liu X, Rahman T, Song C, Su B, Yang F, Yong T, Wu YS, Zhang CY, Yang WY (2017) Changes in light environment, morphology, growth and yield of soybean in maize-soybean intercropping systems. Field Crop Res 200:38–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2016.10.003
Liu X, Rahman T, Song C, Yang F, Su B, Cui L, Bu WZ, Yang WY (2018) Relationships among light distribution, radiation use efficiency and land equivalent ratio in maize-soybean strip intercropping. Field Crop Res 224:91–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2018.05.010
Liu G, Yang YS, Liu WM, Guo XX, Xie RZ, Ming B, Xue J, Zhang GQ, Li RF, Wang KR, Hou P, Li SK (2022a) Optimized canopy structure improves maize grain yield and resource use efficiency. Food and Energy Security 11:e375. https://doi.org/10.1002/fes3.375
Liu GZ, Yang YS, Guo XX, Liu WM, Xie RZ, Ming B, Xue J, Wang K, Li SK, Hou P (2022b) Coordinating maize source and sink relationship to achieve yield potential of 22.5 mg ha−1. Field Crop Res 283:108544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2022.108544
Luo N, Meng Q, Feng P, Qu Z, Yu Y, Liu DL, Müller C, Wang P (2023) China can be self-sufficient in maize production by 2030 with optimal crop management. Nat Commun 14:2637. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-38355-2
Ma L, Zhang X, Lei QY, Liu F (2021) Effects of drip irrigation nitrogen coupling on dry matter accumulation and yield of summer maize in arid areas of China. Field Crop Res 274:108321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2021.108321
MacNeill GJ, Mehrpouyan S, Minow MA, Patterson JA, Tetlow IJ, Emes MJ (2017) Starch as a source, starch as a sink: the bifunctional role of starch in carbon allocation. J Exp Bot 68(16):4433–4453. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erx291
Niu YN, Chen TX, Zhao CC, Zhou MX (2021) Improving crop lodging resistance by adjusting plant height and stem strength. Agronomy 11:2421. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11122421
Raza MA, Feng LY, Werf VDW, Iqbal N, Khan I, Hassan MJ, Ansar M, Chen YK, Zeng JX, Shi JY, Ahmed M, Yang F, Yang WY (2019) Optimum leaf defoliation: a new agronomic approach for increasing nutrient uptake and land equivalent ratio of maize soybean relay intercropping system. Field Crop Res 244:107647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2019.107647
Raza MA, Feng LY, Werf VD, Iqbal N, Khalid MHB, Chen YK, Wasaya A, Ahmed S, Din AMU, Khan A, Ahmed S, Yang F, Yang WY (2019a) Maize leaf-removal: a new agronomic approach to increase dry matter, flower number and seed-yield of soybean in maize soybean relay intercropping system. Sci Reports 9:13453. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-49858-8
Raza MA, Cui L, Khan I, Din AMU, Chen G, Ansar M, Ahmed M, Ahmad S, Manaf A, Titriku JK, Shah GA, Yang F, Yang WY (2021) Compact maize canopy improves radiation use efficiency and grain yield of maize/soybean relay intercropping system. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28:41135–41148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-13541-1
Ren BZ, Zhang JW, Dong ST, Liu P, Zhao B (2016) Effects of waterlogging on leaf mesophyll cell ultrastructure and photosynthetic characteristics of summer maize. PLoS One 11:e0161424. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0161424
Rivera-Amado C, Trujillo-Negrellos E, Molero G, Reynolds MP, Sylvester-Bradley R, Foulkes MJ (2019) Optimizing dry-matter partitioning for increased spike growth, grain number and harvest index in spring wheat. Field Crop Res 240:154–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2019.04.016
Simkin AJ, Kapoor L, Doss CGP, Hofmann TA, Lawson T, Ramamoorthy S (2022) The role of photosynthesis related pigments in light harvesting, photoprotection and enhancement of photosynthetic yield in planta. Photosynthesis Res 152:23–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11120-021-00892-6
Stewart DW, Costa C, Dwyer LM, Smith DL, Hamilton RI, Ma BL (2003) Canopy structure, light interception, and photosynthesis in maize. Agron J 95:1465–1474. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2003.1465
Tian BJ, Zhu JC, Liu XW, Huang SB, Wang P (2020) Interacting leaf dynamics and environment to optimize maize sowing date in North China plain. J Integr Agric 19:1227–1240. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2095-3119(19)62831-5
Wang XL, Zhang SQ, Wang SQ, Wang ZL (2012) The dynamic variation of maize (Zea mays L.) population growth characteristics under cultivars-intercropped on the loess plateau. Acta Eco Sinical 32:7383–7390. https://doi.org/10.5846/stxb201111111716
Wang GH, Sheng LC, Zhao D, Sheng JD, Wang XR, Liao H (2016) Allocation of nitrogen and carbon is regulated by nodulation and mycorrhizal networks in soybean/maize intercropping system. Front Plant Sci 7:1901. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.01901
Wu HY, Tang HK, Liu LA, Shi L, Zhang WF, Jiang CD (2021) Local weak light induces the improvement of photosynthesis in adjacent illuminated leaves in maize seedlings. Physiol Plantarum 171:125–136. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppl.13220
Wu YS, Gong WZ, Yang F, Wang XC, Yong TW, Liu J, Pu T, Yan YH, Yang WY (2022) Dynamic of recovery growth of intercropped soybean after maize harvest in maize–soybean relay strip intercropping system. Food and Energy Security 11:e350. https://doi.org/10.1002/fes3.350
Xu J, Wang JJ, Xue HW, Zhang GH (2021) Leaf direction: Lamina joint development and environmental responses. Plant Cell Environ 44:2441–2454. https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.14065
Xue J, Gou L, Shi ZG, Zhao YS, Zhang WF (2017) Effect of leaf removal on photosynthetically active radiation distribution in maize canopy and stalk strength. J Integr Agric 16:85–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2095-3119(16)61394-1
Yang F, Wang XC, Liao DP, Lu FZ, Gao RC, Liu WG, Yong TW, Wu XL, Du JB, Liu J, Yang WY (2015) Yield response to different planting geometries in maize–soybean relay strip intercropping systems. Agron J 107(1):296–304. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj14.0263
Yang F, Feng L, Liu Q, Wu X, Fan YF, Raza MA, Yang WY (2018) Effect of interactions between light intensity and red-to-far-red ratio on the photosynthesis of soybean leaves under shade condition. Environ Exp Bot 150:79–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2018.03.008
Yang YS, Guo XX, Liu GZ, Liu WM, Xue J, Ming B, Xie RZ, Wang KR, Hou P, Li SK (2021) Solar radiation effects on dry matter accumulations and transfer in maize. Fron Plant Sci 12:727134. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.727134
Yao YC, Wang SH, Yun K (2007) Characteristics of photosynthesis machinism in different peach species under low light intensity. Sci Agric Sin 40:4
Yu W, Liu Y, Song LL, Jacobs DF, Du XH, Ying YQ, Shao QS, Wu JS (2017) Effect of differential light quality on morphology, photosynthesis, and antioxidant enzyme activity in Camptotheca acuminata seedlings. J Plant Growth Regulation 36:148–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00344-016-9625-y
Zhang P, Gu S, Wang Y, Xu C, Zhao Y, Liu XL, Wang P, Huang SB (2023) The relationships between maize (Zea mays L.) lodging resistance and yield formation depend on dry matter allocation to ear and stem. Crop J 11:258–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cj.2022.04.020
Zhao YT, Zhang S, Lv YJ, Ning FF, Cao YB, Liao SH, Huang SB (2022) Optimizing ear-plant height ratio to improve kernel number and lodging resistance in maize (Zea mays L.). Field Crop Res 276:108376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2021.108376
Zhou T, Wang L, Sun X, Wang XC, Pu T, Yang H, Rengel Z, Liu WG, Yang WY (2021) Improved post-silking light interception increases yield and P-use efficiency of maize in maize/soybean relay strip intercropping. Field Crop Res 262:108054. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2020.108054
Funding
This study was supported by the following funding sources: Annual water and fertilizer efficient utilization and regulation technology research (2022YFD2300902–02); Key cultivation technology innovation and application of new maize varieties (2021YFYZ0005); Soybean maize strip mixed intercropping planting technology and application in Tianfu New Area (XZY1–03); Soybean green increase production and efficiency technology integration and demonstration in Meigu County (2022YFD1100203).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Writing - original draft, L.F., T.P., G.P. C.; Data curation, B.L. and X.L., Methodology, Y.S.W., W.Y.Y., F.Y., T.W.Y., Review and editing, X.C.W., Funding acquisition X.C.W.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Rui-Peng Yu.
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Feng, L., Chen, G., Pu, T. et al. Analyzing the stable yield mechanism of maize-soybean intercropping based on the perspective of assimilation product distribution, leaf photosynthetic physiology and leaf anatomical structure. Plant Soil (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-024-06634-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-024-06634-6