Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Effect of immune checkpoint inhibitors at different treatment time periods on prognosis of patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer

  • RESEARCH ARTICLE
  • Published:
Clinical and Translational Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The application of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in treating patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) has brought us new hope, but the real-world outcome is relatively lacking. Our aim was to investigate the clinical use, efficacy, and survival benefit of ICIs in ES-SCLC from real-world data analysis.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of ES-SCLC patients was conducted between 2012 and 2022. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed between groups to evaluate the value of ICIs at different lines of treatment. PFS1 was defined as the duration from initial therapy to disease progression or death. PFS2 was defined as the duration from the first disease progression to the second disease progression or death.

Results

One hundred and eighty patients with ES-SCLC were included. We performed landmark analysis, which showed that compared to the second-line and subsequent-lines ICIs-combined therapy group (2SL-ICIs) and non-ICIs group, the first-line ICIs-combined therapy group (1L-ICIs) prolonged OS and PFS1. There was a trend toward prolonged OS in the 2SL-ICIs group than in the non-ICIs group, but the significance threshold was not met (median OS 11.94 months vs. 11.10 months, P = 0.14). A longer PFS2 was present in the 2SL-ICIs group than in the non-ICIs group (median PFS2 4.13 months vs. 2.60 months, P < 0.001).

Conclusion

First-line ICIs plus chemotherapy should be applied in clinical practice. If patients did not use ICIs plus chemotherapy in first-line therapy, the use of ICIs in the second line or subsequent lines of treatment could prolong PFS2.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All data and materials are real and available.

References

  1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, Bray F. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):209–49.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Oronsky B, Abrouk N, Caroen S, Lybeck M, Guo X, Wang X, et al. A 2022 update on extensive stage small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). J Cancer. 2022;13(9):2945–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Zugazagoitia J, Paz-Ares L. Extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer: first-line and second-line treatment options. J Clin Oncol. 2022;40(6):671–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Li L, Liu T, Liu Q, Mu S, Tao H, Yang X, et al. Rechallenge of immunotherapy beyond progression in patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer. Front Pharmacol. 2022;13: 967559.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Ma X, Wang S, Zhang Y, Wei H, Yu J. Efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (SCLC). J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2021;147(2):593–606.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Iams WT, Porter J, Horn L. Immunotherapeutic approaches for small-cell lung cancer. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2020;17(5):300–12.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Melosky B, Cheema PK, Brade A, McLeod D, Liu G, Price PW, et al. Prolonging survival: the role of immune checkpoint inhibitors in the treatment of extensive-stage small cell lung cancer. Oncologist. 2020;25(11):981–92.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Paz-Ares L, Dvorkin M, Chen Y, Reinmuth N, Hotta K, Trukhin D, et al. Durvalumab plus platinum-etoposide versus platinum-etoposide in first-line treatment of extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (CASPIAN): a randomised, controlled, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2019;394(10212):1929–39.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Horn L, Mansfield AS, Szczesna A, Havel L, Krzakowski M, Hochmair MJ, et al. First-line atezolizumab plus chemotherapy in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2018;379(23):2220–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Wang J, Zhou C, Yao W, Wang Q, Min X, Chen G, et al. Adebrelimab or placebo plus carboplatin and etoposide as first-line treatment for extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (CAPSTONE-1): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2022;23(6):739–47.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Cheng Y, Han L, Wu L, Chen J, Sun H, Wen G, et al. Effect of first-line serplulimab vs placebo added to chemotherapy on survival in patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer: the ASTRUM-005 randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2022;328(12):1223–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Yang Y, Ai X, Xu H, Yang G, Yang L, Hao X, et al. Treatment patterns and outcomes of immunotherapy in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer based on real-world practice. Thorac Cancer. 2022;13(23):3295–303.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Pujol JL, Greillier L, Audigier-Valette C, Moro-Sibilot D, Uwer L, Hureaux J, et al. A randomized non-comparative phase II study of anti-programmed cell death-ligand 1 atezolizumab or chemotherapy as second-line therapy in patients with small cell lung cancer: results from the IFCT-1603 trial. J Thorac Oncol. 2019;14(5):903–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Spigel DR, Vicente D, Ciuleanu TE, Gettinger S, Peters S, Horn L, et al. Second-line nivolumab in relapsed small-cell lung cancer: CheckMate 331(☆). Ann Oncol. 2021;32(5):631–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Rudin CM, Awad MM, Navarro A, Gottfried M, Peters S, Csoszi T, et al. Pembrolizumab or placebo plus etoposide and platinum as first-line therapy for extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer: randomized, double-blind, phase III KEYNOTE-604 study. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38(21):2369–79.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Quinn C, Garrison LP, Pownell AK, Atkins MB, de Pouvourville G, Harrington K, et al. Current challenges for assessing the long-term clinical benefit of cancer immunotherapy: a multi-stakeholder perspective. J Immunother Cancer. 2020;8(2):e000648.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Michielin O, Lalani AK, Robert C, Sharma P, Peters S. Defining unique clinical hallmarks for immune checkpoint inhibitor-based therapies. J Immunother Cancer. 2022;10(1):e003024.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Borghaei H, Gettinger S, Vokes EE, Chow LQM, Burgio MA, de Castro CJ, et al. Five-year outcomes from the randomized, phase III trials CheckMate 017 and 057: nivolumab versus docetaxel in previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2021;39(7):723–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Motzer RJ, Escudier B, McDermott DF, Arén Frontera O, Melichar B, Powles T, et al. Survival outcomes and independent response assessment with nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus sunitinib in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma: 42-month follow-up of a randomized phase 3 clinical trial. J Immunother Cancer. 2020;8(2):e000891

  20. Regan MM, Jegede OA, Mantia CM, Powles T, Werner L, Motzer RJ, et al. Treatment-free survival after immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy versus targeted therapy for advanced renal cell carcinoma: 42-month results of the checkmate 214 trial. Clin Cancer Res. 2021;27(24):6687–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Mishra MV, Louie AV, Gondi V, Slotman B. The evolving role of radiotherapy in the management of small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Dis. 2018;10(Suppl 21):S2545–54.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Sun A, Durocher-Allen LD, Ellis PM, Ung YC, Goffin JR, Ramchandar K, Darling G. Guideline for the initial management of small cell lung cancer (limited and extensive stage) and the role of thoracic radiotherapy and first-line chemotherapy. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2018;30(10):658–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Lahiri A, Maji A, Potdar PD, Singh N, Parikh P, Bisht B, et al. Lung cancer immunotherapy: progress, pitfalls, and promises. Mol Cancer. 2023;22(1):40.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Maddison P, Newsom-Davis J, Mills KR, Souhami RL. Favourable prognosis in Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome and small-cell lung carcinoma. Lancet. 1999;353(9147):117–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Reck M, Bondarenko I, Luft A, Serwatowski P, Barlesi F, Chacko R, et al. Ipilimumab in combination with paclitaxel and carboplatin as first-line therapy in extensive-disease-small-cell lung cancer: results from a randomized, double-blind, multicenter phase 2 trial. Ann Oncol. 2013;24(1):75–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Wu J, Waxman DJ. Immunogenic chemotherapy: Dose and schedule dependence and combination with immunotherapy. Cancer Lett. 2018;419:210–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Slotman BJ, van Tinteren H, Praag JO, Knegjens JL, El Sharouni SY, Hatton M, et al. Use of thoracic radiotherapy for extensive stage small-cell lung cancer: a phase 3 randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2015;385(9962):36–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors also appreciate the Ethics Committee of Shandong Provincial Qianfoshan Hospital, Shandong University (No. 2022-S607).

Funding

This research was funded by Shandong Natural Science Foundation (ZR202108070028 and ZR2022MH103).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors are involved in the creation of manuscripts by making specific contributions.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Pingping Hu or Jiandong Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

There are no conflicts of interest to report.

Ethical approval and consent to participate

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki (as revised in 2013). The retrospective study was approved by the Evaluation Committee of Shandong Provincial Qianfoshan Hospital prior to being performed (No. 2022-S607). Individual consent for this retrospective analysis was waived. Participating hospitals notified and agreed to carry out research.

Consent to publish

Individual consent for this retrospective analysis was waived. Participating hospitals notified and agreed to carry out research.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (PDF 501 KB)

Supplementary file2 (PDF 50 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mi, S., Yang, Y., Liu, X. et al. Effect of immune checkpoint inhibitors at different treatment time periods on prognosis of patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer. Clin Transl Oncol (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12094-024-03471-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12094-024-03471-y

Keywords

Navigation