Skip to main content
Log in

Estimation of Economic Losses in Trammel Nets Fisheries Using the Length–weight Relationship

  • Research
  • Published:
Thalassas: An International Journal of Marine Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

Trammel nets are used with nearly five days of soaking time to increase the catching efficiency of demersal fish under the control of commercial fishers in the Marmara Sea, Türkiye. The long soaking times can be deteriorate or damage individuals of fish species and economic losses. In this situation, the length and weight of fresh individuals can be measured, but damaged individuals can not be measured in length and weight or both. These losses can be revealed by relating of the length–weight relationship. The current study aimed to determine economic losses by estimating the length–weight relationships of known length and weight of fresh individuals, and by calculating the weight of damaged individuals depending on the length–weight relationships. The catching operations with different soaking times were conducted firstly from December 2020 to December 2021 and secondly from the winter and spring seasons of 2022 in the Marmara Sea, Türkiye. A total of 654 individuals of all species were caught and 185 of them were determined to be damaged. This shows that 30% of those caught were damaged individuals. The total weight of the damaged individuals was calculated to be 91.3 kg. The damaged fish were caught with a total of 2000 m trammel nets and it was determined that they caused an economic loss of 355.3 USD. When we consider the decline and overexploitation of fish stocks, these economic losses and damaged individuals with long soaking times for trammel nets are significant. So, the negative effects of long soaking times on catchable stocks should be evaluated by fisheries managers, and the long soaking times of trammel nets should be regulated for sustainable fisheries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The data that support this paper are not available elsewhere. There are no shared data.

References

  • Akyol O, Metin G (2001) An investigation on determination of some morphological characteristics of Cephalopods in Izmir Bay (Aegean Sea). EgeJFAS 18(3):357–365

    Google Scholar 

  • Alverson DL, Dunlop K (1998) Status of world marine fish stocks. University of Washington Seattle, Washington, Fisheries Research Institute School of Fisheries

    Google Scholar 

  • Benoît HP, Plante S, Kroiz M, Hurlbut T (2013) A comparative analysis of marine fish species susceptibilities to discard mortality: effects of environmental factors, individual traits and phylogeny. ICES J Mar Sci 70(1):99–113. https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fss132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bilecenoğlu M, Kaya M, Cihangir B, Çiçek E (2014) An updated checklist of the marine fishes of Turkey. Turk J Zool 38(6):901–929. https://doi.org/10.3906/zoo-1405-60a

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bök TD, Göktürk D, Kahraman AE, Alicli TZ, Acun T, Ates C (2011) Length-weight relationships of 34 fish species from the Sea of Marmara, Turkey. J Adv Vet Anim Res 10(23):3037–3042

    Google Scholar 

  • Brinkhof I, Herrmann B, Larsen RB, Brinkhof J, Grimaldo E, Vollstad J (2023) Effect of gillnet twine thickness on capture pattern and efficiency in the Northeast-Arctic cod (Gadusmorhua) fishery. Mar Pollut Bull 191:114927. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2023.114927

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chopin FS, Arimoto T (1995) The condition of fish escaping from fishing gears—a review. Fish Res 21(3–4):315–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-7836(94)00301-C

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coelho R, Infante P, Santos MN (2013) Application of generalized linear models and generalized estimation equations to model at-haulback mortality of blue sharks captured in a pelagic longline fishery in the Atlantic Ocean. Fish Res 145:66–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2013.02.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Czudaj S, Möllmann C, Fock HO (2022) Length–weight relationships of 55 mesopelagic fishes from the eastern tropical North Atlantic: Across-and within-species variation (body shape, growth stanza, condition factor). J Fish Biol 101(1):26–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfb.15068

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Daban İB, Arslanİhsanoğlu M, İşmen A, İnceoğlu H (2020) Length-weight relationships of 17 teleost fishes in the Marmara Sea, Turkey. KSU J Agric Nat 23(5):1245–1256. https://doi.org/10.18016/ksutarimdoga.vi.682467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daban İB, İhsanoğlu MA, İşmen A, Yığın CÇ (2021) Age, growth, and reproduction of common sole, Solea solea (Linnaeus, 1758) in the Sea of Marmara, Turkey. Acta Aquat Turc 17(3):395–408. https://doi.org/10.22392/actaquatr.866428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis MV (2002) Key principles for understanding fish bycatch discard mortality. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 59:1834–1843. https://doi.org/10.1139/f02-139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demirel N, Dalkara EM (2012) Weight-length relationships of 28 fish species in the Sea of Marmara. Turk J Zool 36(6):785–791. https://doi.org/10.3906/zoo-1111-29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dulvy NK, Simpfendorfer CA, Davidson LN, Fordham SV, Bräutigam A, Sant G, Welch DJ (2017) Challenges and priorities in shark and ray conservation. Curr Biol 27(11):565–572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2017.04.038

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Duysak Ö, Sendão J, Borges T, Erdem Ü (2008) Cephalopod distribution in Iskenderun Bay (Eastern Mediterranean-Turkey). J FisheriesSciences.com 2:118–125. https://doi.org/10.3153/jfscom.2008013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis J (2016) Raja clavata. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2016: e.T39399A103110667. https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2016-3.RLTS.T39399A103110667.en. Accessed 14 Mar 2024

  • Eryilmaz L, Meriç N (2005) Some biological characteristics of the tub gurnard, Chelidonichthyslucernus (Linnaeus, 1758) in the Sea of Marmara. Turkish J Vet Anim Sci 29(2):367–374

    Google Scholar 

  • Erzini K, Goncalves JMS, Bentes L, Moutopoulos DK, Casal JAH, Soriguer MC, Puente E, Errazkin LA, Stergiou KI (2006) Size selectivity of trammel nets in southern European small-scale fisheries. Fish Res 79(1–2):183–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fabi G, Sbrana M, Biagi F, Grati F, Leonori I, Sartor P (2002) Trammel net and gill net selectivity for Lithognathusmormyrus (L., 1758), Diplodusannularis (L., 1758) and Mullus barbatus (L., 1758) in the Adriatic and Ligurian seas. Fish Res 54:375–388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falsone F, Geraci ML, Scannella D, Gancitano V, Di Maio F, Sardo G, Quattrocchi F, Vitale S (2022) Length-weight relationships of 52 species from the south of Sicily (Central Mediterranean Sea). Fishes 7(2):92. https://doi.org/10.3390/fishes7020092

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finucci B, Chartrain E, Derrick D, Dossa J, Pacoureau N, VanderWright WJ, Williams AB (2021) Torpedo marmorata. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2021: e.T161328A124466265. https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2021-2.RLTS.T161328A124466265.en. Accessed - 14 March 2024-

  • Froese R (2006) Cube law, condition factor and weight-length relationships: History, meta-analysis and recommendations. J Appl Ichthyol 11:241–253. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0426.2006.00805.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GDFA (2020) Notification 5/1 regulating (2020/20) commercial fishing for 2020–2024. The Republic of Turkey, Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, General Directorate of Fisheries and Aquaculture, Ankara, Turkey: 69 pp

  • Hayes DB, Brodziak JKT, O’Gorman JB (1995) Efficiency and bias of estimators and sampling designs for determining length–weight relationships of fish. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 52:84–92. https://doi.org/10.1139/f95-008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hilborn R, Amoroso RO, Anderson CM, Baum JK, Branch TA, Costello C et al (2020) Effective fisheries management instrumental in improving fish stock status. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 117(4):2218–2224. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1909726116

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmayer ER, Hendon JM, Parsons GR (2012) Seasonal modulation in the secondary stress response of a carcharhinid shark, Rhizoprionodon terraenovae. Comp Biochem Physiol A 162:81–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpa.2011.05.002

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Holden MJ, Raitt DFS (1974) Manual of fisheries science. Part2. Method of resource investigation and their application. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper. Vol. 115, Rev. 1, Rome, Italy, p 214

  • Humborstad OB, Løkkeborg S, Hareide NR, Furevik DM (2003) Catches of Greenland halibut (Reinhardtiushippoglossoides) in deepwater ghost-fishing gillnets on the Norwegian continental slope. Fish Res 64(2–3):163–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-7836(03)00215-

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ismen A (2003) Age, growth, reproduction and food of common stingray (Dasyatispastinaca L., 1758) in Iskenderun Bay, the eastern Mediterranean. Fish Res 60(1):169–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-7836(02)00058-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ismen A, Ozen O, Altinagac U, Ozekinci U, Ayaz A (2007) Weight–length relationships of 63 fish species in Saros Bay, Turkey. J Appl Ichthyol 23:707–708. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0426.2007.00872.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Işmen A, Yığın CÇ, İhsanoğlu MA, Daban İB (2018a) Length-weight relationships for three elasmobranch species from the Sea of Marmara. J Black Sea/medit Environ 24:65–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Işmen A, İnceoğlu H, İhsanoğlu MA, Yığın CÇ, Çardak M, Daban İB, Kocabaş E, Özer Z, Kara A, Şirin M, Öktener A (2018b) Length-weight relationships and abundance distribution of triglidae species caught by beam-trawl in The Sea of Marmara. COMU-JMSF 1(1):13–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Jabado RW, Chartrain E, De Bruyne G, Derrick D, Dia M, Diop M, Doherty P, Leurs GHL, et al (2021) Dasyatis pastinaca. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species: e.T161453A124488102. https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2021-2.RLTS.T161453A124488102.en. Accessed 27 Feb 2024

  • Karadurmuş U (2022) Length–weight relationship and condition factor of sixteen demersal fish species from the Southern part of the Marmara Sea, Turkey. J Ichthyol 62(4):543–551. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0032945222040105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karlsen L, Bjarnason BA (1987) Small-scale fishing with driftnets. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper. No. 284, Rome, Italy, p 64

  • Keskin Ç, Gaygusuz Ö (2010) Length-weight relationships of fishes in shallow waters of Erdek Bay (Sea of Marmara, Turkey). Eur J Biol 69(2):87–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitahara T (1971) On selectivity curve of gill-net. Bull Japan Soc Sci Fis 37(4):289–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kraak SBM, Velasco A, Frose U, Krumme U (2019) Prediction of delayed mortality using vitality scores and reflexes, as well as catch, processing, and post-release conditions: evidence from discarded flatfish in the Western Baltic trawl fishery. ICES J Mar Sci 76:330–341. https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsy129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le Cren ED (1951) The length-weight relationship and seasonal cycle in gonad weight and condition in the perch (Percafluviatilis). J Animal Ecol 20(2):201–219. https://doi.org/10.2307/1540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucchetti A, Virgili M, Petetta A, Sartor P (2020) An overview of gill net and trammel net size selectivity in the Mediterranean Sea. Fish Res 230:105677. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2020.105677

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mendes B, Fonseca P, Campos A (2004) Weight-length relationships for 46 fish species of the Portuguese west coast. J Appl Ichthyol 20:355–361. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0426.2004.00559.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Millner RS (1985) The Use of Anchored Gill and Tangle Nets in the Sea Fisheries of England and Wales. Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Directorate of Fisheries Research, Laboratory Leaflet No. 57, Lowesoft

  • Mommsen TP (1998) growth and metabolism. In: Evans DH (ed) The physiology of fishes. CRC Press, New York, pp 65–97

    Google Scholar 

  • Moutopoulos DK, Stergiou KI (2002) Length-weight and length-length relationships of fish species from the Aegean Sea (Greece). J Appl Ichthyol 18:200–203. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0426.2002.00281.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mülayim A, Ateş AS, Şen Y, Özekinci U, Acar S (2022) Occurrence of the scavenger crustaceans Natatolananeglecta (Hansen, 1890)(Isopoda: Cirolanidae) and Scopelocheirushopei (Costa in Hope, 1851)(Amphipoda: Scopelocheiridae) on bento-pelagic fish species in the Turkish Straits System. Acta Zool Bulg 74(4):529–534

    Google Scholar 

  • Nuhu MB, Yaro I (2005) Selection of efficient hanging ratio of gill net on fish catch in Lake Kainji as a means of alleviating poverty among artisanal fisherman in Nigeria. In: Araoye PA (eds) Proceedings of the 19th Annual Conference to Tropical Fisheries Society of Nigeria(FISON):64–72

  • Okwuosa OB, Eyo JE, Omovwohwovıe EE, Amadııbıam CO (2018) A review on fishing gear technology of the world and its application. Iconic Res Eng J 2(5):177–196

    Google Scholar 

  • Perissi I, Bardi U, El Asmar T, Lavacchi A (2017) Dynamic patterns of overexploitation in fisheries. Ecol Modell 359:285–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2017.06.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petrakis G, Stergiou KI (1995) Weight-length relationships for 33 fish species in Greek waters. Fish Res 21:465–469. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-7836(94)00294-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poisson F, Séret B, Vernet AL, Goujon M, Dagorn L (2014) Collaborative research: development of a manual on elasmobranch handling and release best practices in tropical tuna purse-seine fisheries. Mar Policy 44:312–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2013.09.025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rameshkumar G, Ravichandran S (2014) Problems caused by isopod parasites in commercial fishes. J Parasit Dis 38:138–141. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12639-012-0210-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ricker WE (1975) Computation and interpretation of biological statistics of fish populations. Fish Res Board Can Bull 191:1–382

    Google Scholar 

  • Safran P (1992) Theoretical analysis of the weight-length relationship in fish juveniles. Mar Bio 112:545–551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Şen Y, Özekinci U (2022a) The Technical and operational characteristics of marya nets used in Kemer Region of Çanakkale. COMU-JMSF 5(spec is):22–32. https://doi.org/10.46384/jmsf.1138224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Şen Y, Özekinci U (2022b) Some morphometric measurements of the critically endangered angular rough shark (Oxynotus centrina (Linnaeus, 1758) caught by trammel nets in the Sea of Marmara. Marmara JEPS 34(1):141–146. https://doi.org/10.7240/jeps.1053889

  • Sinovcic G, Franicevic M, Zorica B, Ciles-Kec V (2004) Length-weight and length-length relationships for 10 pelagic fish species from the Adriatic Sea (Crotia). J Appl Ichthyol 20:156–158. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0426.2003.00519.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sparre P, Ursin E, Venema SC (1989) Introduction to tropical fish stock assessment. Part I. Manual, FAO Fisheries Technical Paper, Vol. 306, Rome, Italy

  • Taylan B, Bayhan B, Sağlam C, Babaoğlu AÖ, Kara A (2022) The length-weight characteristics of five elasmobranch species (Pisces: Chondrichthyes) from Izmir Bay (Aegean Sea coast of Turkey): Spring 2018. Turkish JAF Sci Tech 10(2):368–373. https://doi.org/10.24925/turjaf.v10i2.368-373.4613

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torres MA, Ramos F, Sobrino I (2012) Length–weight relationships of 76 fish species from the Gulf of Cadiz (SW Spain). Fish Res 127:171–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2012.02.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsagarakis K, Palialexis A, Vassilopoulou V (2014) Mediterranean fishery discards: review of the existing knowledge. ICES J Mar Sci 71(5):1219–1234. https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fst074

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vasilakopoulos P, Maravelias CD, Tserpes G (2014) The alarming decline of Mediterranean fish stocks. Curr Biol 24(14):1643–1648. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2014.05.070

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead PJP, Bauchot ML, Hureau JC, Nielsen J, Tortonese E (1986) Fishes of the North-eastern Atlantic and the Mediterranean. Paris, UNESCO, Volume I, II, III, pp 1-1473

  • WoRMS (2023) World Register of Marine Species. https://www.marinespecies.org/. Accessed 13 Oct 2023

  • Yığın CÇ, İşmen A, Önal U, İhsanoğlu MA (2016) Elasmobranchs of the Sea of Marmara: Catch, biodiversity and conservation. In: Özsoy E, Çağatay MN, Balkıs N, Balkıs N, Özturk B (eds) The Sea of Marine Biodiversity Fisheries, Conservation abd Governance 42:644

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was prepared by The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkiye (Project no: 121Y077) and Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University Scientific Research Project of Turkiye (Project no: FDK-2020-3411).

Funding

The author did not receive support from any organization for the submitted paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Yusuf Şen: Investigation, methodology, project administration, resources, software, visualization, writing original draft. Uğur Özekinci: Conceptualization, data curation, project administration, validation, supervision, validation, writing, review, editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yusuf Şen.

Ethics declarations

Ethical Approval and Consent to Participate

Not applicable.

Human and Animal Ethics

Not applicable. There is no ethical issue concerning this article.

Consent for Publication

All authors have approved the manuscript and agree with its submission and publication to Thalassas: An International Journal of Marine Sciences.

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Şen, Y., Özekinci, U. Estimation of Economic Losses in Trammel Nets Fisheries Using the Length–weight Relationship. Thalassas (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41208-024-00703-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41208-024-00703-4

Keywords

Navigation