Abstract
A common difficulty in introducing reading instruction involves teaching students to blend letter sounds to form words. Often, this difficulty can occur with and without textual stimuli. In 2 experiments, we tested the effects of behavioral momentum blending on acquisition of textual and spelling responses with 11 preschool students. The 3- and 4-year-old participants presented with language and social delays and were selected due to their explicit difficulty in blending as beginning readers. Prior to intervention, we taught participants to rapidly respond to mastered words with up to 5 phoneme–grapheme correspondences. During intervention, textual responses to mastered words were followed by the presentation of a novel word. Participants heard vocal models of component phonemes prior to requiring a blended textual response; models and the behavioral momentum antecedents were faded within sessions. Dependent measures consisted of novel textual and spelling responses and vocally blended responses. In Experiment 2, we added a response-to-extinction measure to compare the reinforcing value of observing text prior to and following intervention. Increases in textual and spelling responses occurred for all participants as well as a shift in reinforcement value in Experiment 2. Results highlight the educational significance of blending when establishing textual responding.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Albers, A. E., & Greer, R. D. (1991). Is the three-term contingency trial a predictor of effective instruction? Journal of Behavioral Education, 1, 337–354. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00947188
Bai, J. Y., Jonas Chan, C. K., Elliffe, D., & Podlesnik, C. A. (2016). Stimulus-reinforcer relations established during training determine resistance to extinction and relapse via reinstatement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 106(3), 225–241. https://doi.org/10.1002/jeab.227
Ball, E. W. (1993). Phonological awareness: What’s important and to whom? Reading and Writing, 5, 141–159. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01027481
Banda, D. R., & Kubina, R. M. (2006). The effects of a high-probability request sequencing technique in enhancing transition behaviors. Education and Treatment of Children, 29(3), 507–516.
Bradley, R. L., & Noell, G. H. (2018). The effectiveness of supplemental phonics instruction employing constant time delay instruction for struggling readers. Psychology in the Schools, 55(7), 880–892. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22148
Brady, S., Fowler, A., Stone, B., & Windbury, N. (1994). Training phonological awareness: A study with inner-city kindergarten children. Annals of Dyslexia, 44, 26–59. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02648154
Buckingham, J. (2020). Systematic phonics instruction belongs in evidence-based reading programs: A response to Bowers. The Educational and Developmental Psychologist, 37(2), 105–113. https://doi.org/10.1017/edp.2020.12
Burns, M. K., Ardoin, S. P., Parker, D. C., Hodgson, J., Klingbeil, D. A., & Scholin, S. E. (2009). Interspersal technique and behavioral momentum for reading word lists. School Psychology Review, 38, 428–434. https://doi.org/10.1080/02796015.2009.12087825
Burns, M. K., Duke, N. K., & Cartwright, K. B. (2023). Evaluating components of the active view of reading as intervention targets: Implications for social justice. School Psychology, 38(1), 30–41. https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000519
Byrne, B., & Fielding-Barnsley, R. (1989). Phonemic awareness and letter knowledge in the child’s acquisition of the alphabetic principle. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(3), 313–321. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.81.3.313
Daly, E. J., Chafouleas, S. M., Persampieri, M., Bonfiglio, C. M., & LaFleur, K. (2004). Teaching phoneme segmenting and blending as critical early literacy skills: An experimental analysis of minimal textual repertoires. Journal of Behavioral Education, 13(3), 165–178. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOBE.0000037627.51167.ea
Davis, C. A., Reichle, J. E., Southard, K. L., & Johnston, S. (1998). Teaching children with severe disabilities to utilize nonobligatory conversational opportunities: An application of high-probability requests. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 23, 57–68. https://doi.org/10.2511/rpsd.23.1.57
Ehri, L. C., Nunes, S. R., Stahl, S. A., & Willows, D. M. (2001). Systematic phonics instruction helps students learn to read: Evidence from the National Reading Panel’s meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 71(3), 393–447. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543071003393
Elleman, A. M., & Oslund, E. L. (2019). Reading comprehension research: Implications for practice and policy. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 6(1), 3–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/237273221881633
Engelmann, S. E., & Carnine, D. W. (1991). Theory of instruction: Principles and applications (Rev). Association for Direct Instruction.
Engelmann, S., Haddox, P., & Bruner, E. (1986). Teach your child to read in 100 easy lessons. Simon & Schuster.
Esch, K., & Fryling, M. T. (2013). A comparison of two variations of the high-probability instructional sequence with a child with autism. Education and Treatment of Children, 36(1), 61–72. https://doi.org/10.1353/etc.2013.0008
Fletcher, J. M., Savage, R., & Vaughn, S. (2021). A commentary on Bowers (2020) and the role of phonics instruction in reading. Educational Psychology Review, 33(3), 1249–1274. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09580-8
Fredrick, L. D., Davis, D. H., Alberto, P. A., & Waugh, R. E. (2013). From initial phonics to functional phonics: Teaching word-analysis skills to students with moderate intellectual disability. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 48(1), 49–66.
Greer, R. D., & Du, L. (2015). Identification and establishment of reinforcers that make the development of complex social language possible. International Journal of Behavior Analysis and Autism Disorders, 1(1), 13–34.
Greer, R. D., Speckman, J., Dudek, J., Cahill, C., Weber, J., Du, L., & Longano, J. (2019). Early learner curriculum and achievement record (ELCAR): A CABAS® developmental inventory. https://www.scienceofteaching.org/product-page/elcar-early-learner-curriculum-and-achievement-record
Greer, R. D., Stolfi, L., Chavez-Brown, M., & Rivera-Valdes, C. (2005). The emergence of the listener to speaker component of naming in children as a function of multiple exemplar instruction. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 21(1), 123–134. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03393014
Greer, R. D., & Ross, D. E. (2008). Verbal behavior analysis: Inducing and expanding verbal capabilities in children with language delays. Pearson Education Inc.
Hempenstall, K. (2020). Teaching reading through Direct Instruction: A role for educational psychologists? The Educational and Developmental Psychologist, 37(2), 133–139. https://doi.org/10.1017/edp.2020.13
Horner, R. D., & Baer, D. M. (1978). Multiple-probe technique: A variation of the multiple baseline. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11, 189–196. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1978.11-189
Hutchinson, J. M., & Belfiore, P. J. (1998). Adding a sequence of high-preference mathematics problems to increase low-preference mathematics problems performance. Proven Practice, 1, 12–16. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2012.45-223
Kern, L., & Clemens, N. H. (2007). Antecedent strategies to promote appropriate classroom behavior. Psychology in the Schools, 44(1), 65–75. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20206
Keohane, D., Luke, N., & Greer, R. D. (2008). The things we care to see: The effects of the rotated protocol immersion on the emergence of early observing responses. Journal of Early and Intensive Behavioral Interventions, 5(1), 23–39. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0100408
Killu, K., Sainato, D. M., Davis, C. A., Ospelt, H., & Paul, J. N. (1998). Effects of high-probability request sequences on preschoolers’ compliance and disruptive behavior. Journal of Behavioral Education, 8(3), 347–368. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022875331474
Kleinert-Ventresca, K., Greer, R. D., & Baldonado, L. (2023). More complex incidental bidirectional naming results from exposure alone. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 119(3), 461–475. https://doi.org/10.1002/jeab.847
LAZEL, Inc., (2023). Reading A-Z. https://www.readinga-z.com/
Lee, D. L. (2006). Facilitating transitions between and within academic tasks: An application of behavioral momentum. Remedial and Special Education, 27(5), 312–317. https://doi.org/10.1177/07419325060270050601
Lee, D. L., & Laspe, A. K. (2003). Using high-probability request sequences to increase journal writing. Journal of Behavioral Education, 12(4), 261–273. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025944923494
Lyons, L. (2014). The effects of the mastery of auditory matching of component sounds to words on the rate of accuracy of textual and spelling responses [Doctoral dissertation, Columbia University]. Columbia Academic Commons. https://academiccommons.columbia.edu/doi/10.7916/D8542KRM
Martens, B. K., Werder, C. S., Hier, B. O., & Koenig, E. A. (2013). Fluency training in phoneme blending: A preliminary study of generalized effects. Journal of Behavioral Education, 22, 16–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-012-9159-8
McGuinness, D. (2004). Early reading instruction: What science really tells us about how to teach reading. MIT Press.
McGuinness, D. (2005). Language development and learning to read: The scientific study of how language development affects reading skill. MIT Press.
Mellon, L., & Greer, R. D. (2023). Effects of a vocal phoneme segmentation intervention on remediating reading difficulties in kindergarten students. Behavior and Social Issues. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42822-023-00152-3
Mellon, L., & Loomis, K. (2024a). Establishing fluent textual responses as a reader and writer. In D. Ross & R. Douglas Greer (Eds.), When text speaks: Learning to read and reading to learn. Sloan Publishing.
Mellon, L., & Loomis, K. (2024b). Idiosyncratic problems in learning to textually respond. In D. Ross & R. Douglas Greer (Eds.), When text speaks: Learning to read and reading to learn. Sloan Publishing.
Moats, L. C. (2020). Teaching reading “is” rocket science: What expert teachers of reading should know and be able to do. American Educator, 44(2), 4–9.
National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. National Institute of Health.
Nevin, J. A. (1996). The momentum of compliance. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 29(4), 535–547. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1996.29-535
Parker, D. C., Klingeil, D. A., Hanrahan, A. R., Schramm, A. L., Copek, R. A., & Willenbrink, J. B. (2022). Effects of a multi-component decoding intervention for at-risk first graders. Journal of Behavioral Education, 31(2), 326–349. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-020-09400-7
Ross, D., & Greer, R. D. (2003). Generalized imitation and the mand: Inducing first instances of speech in young children with autism. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 24, 58–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0891-4222(02)00167-1
Ross-Page, D., & Greer, R. D. (2024). Introduction. In D. Ross & R. Douglas Greer (Eds.), When text speaks: Learning to read and reading to learn. Sloan Publishing.
Schroeder, S. R., & Holland, J. G. (1968). Operant control of eye movements. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1(2), 161–166. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1968.1-161
Skinner, B. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. Prentice Hall.
Stein, M., Carnine, D., & Dixon, R. (1998). Direct Instruction: Integrating curriculum design and effective teaching practice. Intervention in School and Clinic, 33(4), 195–256. https://doi.org/10.1177/105345129803300405
Stockard, J. (2021). Building a more effective, equitable, and compassionate educational system: The role of Direct Instruction. Perspectives on Behavior Science, 44(2–3), 147–167. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40614-021-00287-x
Stockard, J., Wood, T. W., Coughlin, C., & Rasplica Khoury, C. (2018). The effectiveness of Direct Instruction curricula: A meta-analysis on a half century of research. Review of Educational Research, 88(4), 479–507. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654317751919
Tsiouri, I., & Greer, R. D. (2003). Inducing vocal verbal behavior in children with severe language delays through rapid motor imitation responding. Journal of Behavioral Education, 12(3), 185–206. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025508311022
Tsiouri, I., & Greer, R. D. (2007). The role of different social reinforcement contingencies in inducing echoic tacts through motor imitation responding in children with severe language delays. Journal of Early and Intensive Behavior Intervention, 4(4), 629–647. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0100397
Wang, Y., Spychala, H., Harris, R. S., & Oetting, T. L. (2013). The effectiveness of a phonics-based early intervention for deaf and hard of hearing preschool children and its possible impact on reading skills in elementary school: A case study. American Annals of the Deaf, 158(2), 107–120.
Webber, C., Patel, H., Cunningham, A., Fox, A., Vousden, J., Castles, A., & Shapiro, L. (2024). An experimental comparison of additional training in phoneme awareness, letter-sound knowledge and decoding for struggling beginning readers. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 282–305. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12641
Weber, J., Loomis, K., & Mellon, L. (2024). Incorporating reading curricula using the strategic science of teaching. In D. Ross & R. Douglas Greer (Eds.), When text speaks: Learning to read and reading to learn. Sloan Publishing.
Yurick, A. L., Council, M., Telesman, A. O., Musti, S., Garner, R., & Cartledge, G. (2024). On the science of reading: How social justice, behavior analysis, and literacy instruction converge. Behavior and Social Issues. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42822-023-00154-1
Funding
No funding was received for conducting this study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no known conflicts of interest to disclose.
Ethical Approval
The research was approved by the respective school’s Institutional Review Board and each participant’s parents provided consent to participate as well as disseminate the findings.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Loomis, K., Greer, R.D. Establishing Component-to-Composite Textual Responses: A Common Obstacle in Learning to Read. J Behav Educ (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-024-09546-8
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-024-09546-8