Abstract
This critique provides a critical analysis of the outcomes following occipito-cervical fusion in patients with Ehlers-Danlos syndromes (EDS) and craniocervical instability. The study examines the efficacy of the surgical intervention and evaluates its impact on patient outcomes. While the article offers valuable insights into the management of EDS-related craniocervical instability, several limitations and areas for improvement are identified, including sample size constraints, the absence of a control group, and the need for long-term follow-up data. Future research efforts should focus on addressing these concerns to optimize treatment outcomes for individuals with EDS.
We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.
Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.
Dear Editor,
Upon reading the article published in your esteemed journal with great enthusiasm, we would like to extend our heartfelt gratitude to the authors for their unwavering commitment to their research endeavours. I am writing to offer a critique of the recent publication titled “Craniocervical instability in patients with Ehlers‑Danlos syndromes: outcomes analysis following occipito‑cervical fusion .”Undoubtedly, their work presents an exceptional basis for future research. However, there are several inquiries and reservations that motivated us to write this letter. We firmly believe that addressing these concerns would strengthen the study’s overall influence and its contribution to the field of.
knowledge [1].
The letter to the editor regarding craniocervical instability in patients with Ehlers-Danlos syndromes offers a comprehensive analysis of outcomes following occipito-cervical fusion. One positive aspect of the article is its thorough examination of a relatively under-researched area within the context of Ehlers-Danlos syndromes (EDS). By addressing the impact of craniocervical instability and evaluating the efficacy of occipito-cervical fusion, the article contributes valuable insights to the medical community [2]. Additionally, the article’s methodology appears robust, utilizing a combination of clinical assessments and patient-reported outcomes to evaluate the effectiveness of the surgical intervention.
However, despite these strengths, several limitations and negative impacts are evident within the letter. Firstly, the sample size of the study may be insufficient to draw definitive conclusions, potentially limiting the generalizability of the findings. Moreover, the absence of a control group makes it challenging to ascertain the specific impact of occipito-cervical fusion compared to alternative treatment modalities or natural disease progression. Furthermore, while the article acknowledges the complexity of EDS and its varied clinical manifestations, there may be additional factors influencing outcomes that have not been adequately addressed, such as comorbidities or variations in surgical technique [3].
Furthermore, the article could benefit from a more nuanced discussion of potential complications associated with occipito-cervical fusion, as well as long-term follow-up data to assess the durability of surgical outcomes over time. Additionally, considerations regarding patient selection criteria and preoperative screening protocols are crucial aspects that warrant further exploration to optimize treatment outcomes and minimize risks for individuals with EDS [4].
In summary, while the letter to the editor provides valuable insights into the management of craniocervical instability in patients with Ehlers-Danlos syndromes, there are notable limitations and areas for improvement. Future research endeavors should aim to address these concerns through larger-scale studies with longer follow-up periods, incorporating comprehensive assessments of both surgical outcomes and patient-reported experiences to enhance our understanding and management of this complex condition.
Data availability
No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.
References
Craniocervical instability in (2024) Patients with Ehlers–Danlos syndromes: outcomes analysis following occipito–cervical fusion. Neurosurg Rev 47:27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-023-02249-0
Batzdorf U, Henderson FC, Rigamonte D et al (2015) Consensus Statement. In: Batzdorf U, Henderson FC, Rigamonte D (eds) CSF colloquium on co-morbidities that complicate the treatment and outcomes of Chiari Malformation. Chiari and Syringomyelia Foundation Inc, NY, New York, pp 126–134
Grahame R, Malik I, Hakim A, Koby M, Henderson F, Sr (2020) Comment on quantitative measures of tissue mechanics to detect hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos syndrome and hypermobility syndrome disorders: a systematic review. Clin Rheumatol 39(8):2481–2482
Zhao DY, Rock MB, Sandhu FA (2022) Craniocervical stabilization after failed Chiari decompression: a case series of a population with high prevalence of Ehlers-Danlos syndrome. World Neurosurg 161:e546–e552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2022.02.068
Acknowledgements
None to declare.
Funding
The authors received no extramural funding for the study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
The conceptualization was done by ZUNM. The literature and drafting of the manuscript were conducted by ZUNM and AM. The editing and supervision were performed by AM and ZUNM and injunction. All authors have read and agreed to the final version of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare no potential conflicts of interest concerning the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mughal¹, Z.U.N., Malik¹, A. Craniocervical instability in patients with Ehlers‑Danlos syndromes: outcomes analysis following occipito‑cervical fusion of published cases. Neurosurg Rev 47, 158 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-024-02395-z
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-024-02395-z