Skip to main content
Log in

Efficacy and safety analysis of immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer patients with MET alterations

  • RESEARCH ARTICLE
  • Published:
Clinical and Translational Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Mesenchymal epithelial transition factor (MET) is a rare oncologic driver gene, and information on immunotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with this driver gene is limited. Here we evaluate the efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) under different therapeutic regimen for NSCLC patients with MET alterations.

Methods

From June 2019 to December 2023, we assessed the efficacy and toxicity of ICIs in 42 NSCLC patients with MET alterations. Survival curves were plotted using the Kaplan–Meier method and the Cox proportional hazards model applied for univariate and multivariate analyses. We assessed the size of target lesion according to RECIST v1.1, and objective response rate (ORR) was defined as the sum of complete response (CR) and partial response (PR), disease control rate (DCR) as the sum of CR, PR, and disease stable.

Results

A total of 42 NSCLC patients with MET alterations were included in this retrospective study, 10 was MET 14 skipping mutation and 32 was MET amplification. The ORR for ICI treatment was 30.95% and the DCR was 71.43%. Median progression-free survival (mPFS) and median overall survival (OS) were 4.40 and 13.97 months, respectively. There exists statistical differences between the mPFS of ICI monotherapy and combine ICI therapy (2.8 vs 7.8 months, p = 0.022). The incidence of drug-related adverse reactions was 47.62%, mainly bone marrow suppression (14.28%), immune-related pneumonia (7.14%), and liver function impairment (7.14%), and six patients (14.28%) experiencing grade 3 or above adverse events.

Conclusion

NSCLC patients with MET alterations can benefit from immunotherapy, especially the patients treated by combined ICI therapy. However, special attention should be paid to the occurrence of grade 3/4 adverse reactions while using the combined ICI therapy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Xia C, Dong X, Li H, Cao M, Sun D, He S, et al. Cancer statistics in China and United States, 2022: profiles, trends, and determinants. Chin Med J (Engl). 2022;135(5):584–90. https://doi.org/10.1097/CM9.0000000000002108.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Zeng H, Chen W, Zheng R, Zhang S, Ji JS, Zou X, et al. Changing cancer survival in China during 2003-15: a pooled analysis of 17 population-based cancer registries. Lancet Global Health. 2018;6(5):e555–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30127-X.

  3. Sholl LM, Aisner DL, Varella-Garcia M, Berry LD, Dias-Santagata D, Wistuba II, et al. Multi-institutional oncogenic driver mutation analysis in lung adenocarcinoma: the lung cancer mutation consortium experience. J Thorac Oncol. 2015;10(5):768–77. https://doi.org/10.1097/JTO.0000000000000516.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Miller KD, Nogueira L, Mariotto AB, Rowland JH, Yabroff KR, Alfano CM, et al. Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2019. CA Cancer J Clin. 2019;69(5):363–85. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21565.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Wen S, Dai L, Wang L, Wang W, Wu D, Wang K, et al. Genomic signature of driver genes identified by target next-generation sequencing in Chinese non-small cell lung cancer. Oncologist. 2019;24(11):e1070–81. https://doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.2018-0572.

  6. Favoni RE, Alama A. Preclinical strategies targeted at non-small-cell lung cancer signalling pathways with striking translational fallout. Drug Discov Today. 2013;18(1–2):11–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Engelman J. C-MET, a marker of resistance to EGFR inhibitors in NSCLC. Ann Oncol. 2008;19:22. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/295962404_C-Met_a_marker_of_resistance_to_EGFR_inhibitors_in_NSCLC.

  8. Camidge DR, Doebele RC, Kerr KM. Comparing and contrasting predictive biomarkers for immunotherapy and targeted therapy of NSCLC. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2019;16:341–55. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41571-019-0173-9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Dantoing E, Piton N, Salaün M, Thiberville L, Guisier F. Anti-PD1/PD-L1 immunotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer with actionable oncogenic driver mutations. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(12):6288. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22126288.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Vuong HG, Ho ATN, Altibi AMA, Nakazawa T, Katoh R, Kondo T. Clinicopathological implications of MET exon 14 mutations in non-small cell lung cancer—a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lung Cancer. 2018;123:76–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lungcan.2018.07.006.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Schrock AB, Frampton GM, Suh J, Chalmers ZR, Rosenzweig M, Erlich RL, et al. Characterization of 298 patients with lung cancer harboring MET exon 14 skipping alterations. J Thorac Oncol. 2016;11(9):1493–502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtho.2016.06.004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Robinson KW, Sandler AB. The role of MET receptor tyrosine kinase in non-small cell lung cancer and clinical development of targeted anti-MET agents. Oncologist. 2013;18:115–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Wolf J, Seto T, Han JY, Reguart N, Garon EB, Groen HJM, et al. Capmatinib in MET exon 14-mutated or MET-amplified non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2020;383(10):944–57. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2002787.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Yang JJ, Fang J, Shu YQ, Chang JH, Chen GY, He JX, et al. A phase Ib study of the highly selective MET-TKI savolitinib plus gefitinib in patients with EGFR-mutated, MET-amplified advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Invest New Drugs. 2021;39(2):477–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10637-020-01010-4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Camidge DR, Otterson GA, Clark JW, Ignatius Ou SH, Weiss J, Ades S, et al. Crizotinib in patients with MET-amplified NSCLC. J Thorac Oncol. 2021;16(6):1017–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtho.2021.02.010.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Seto T, Ohashi K, Sugawara S, Nishio M, Takeda M, Aoe K, et al. Capmatinib in Japanese patients with MET exon 14 skipping-mutated or MET-amplified advanced NSCLC: GEOMETRY mono-1 study. Cancer Sci. 2021;112(4):1556–66. https://doi.org/10.1111/cas.14826.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Dagogo-Jack I, Moonsamy P, Gainor JF, Lennerz JK, Piotrowska Z, Lin JJ, et al. A phase 2 study of capmatinib in patients with MET-altered lung cancer previously treated with a MET inhibitor. J Thorac Oncol. 2021;16(5):850–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtho.2021.01.1605.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Li J, Wang Y, Zhang B, Xu J, Cao S, Zhong H. Characteristics and response to crizotinib in lung cancer patients with MET amplification detected by next-generation sequencing. Lung Cancer. 2020;149:17–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lungcan.2020.08.021.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Yu Y, Zhou J, Li X, Goto K, Min X, Nishino K, et al. Gumarontinib in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer harbouring MET exon 14 skipping mutations: a multicentre, single-arm, open-label, phase 1b/2 trial. EClinicalMedicine. 2023;6(59): 101952. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.101952.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Drilon A, Clark JW, Weiss J, Ou SI, Camidge DR, Solomon BJ, et al. Antitumor activity of crizotinib in lung cancers harboring a MET exon 14 alteration. Nat Med. 2020;26(1):47–51. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-019-0716-8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Landi L, Chiari R, Tiseo M, D’Incà F, Dazzi C, Chella A, et al. Crizotinib in MET-deregulated or ROS1-rearranged pretreated non-small cell lung cancer (METROS): a phase II, prospective, multicenter, two-arms trial. Clin Cancer Res. 2019;25(24):7312–9. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-19-0994.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Le X, Sakai H, Felip E, Veillon R, Garassino MC, Raskin J, et al. Tepotinib efficacy and safety in patients with MET exon 14 skipping NSCLC: outcomes in patient subgroups from the VISION study with relevance for clinical practice. Clin Cancer Res. 2022;28(6):1117–26. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-21-2733.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Schuler M, Berardi R, Lim WT, de Jonge M, Bauer TM, Azaro A, et al. Molecular correlates of response to capmatinib in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: clinical and biomarker results from a phase I trial. Ann Oncol. 2020;31(6):789–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annonc.2020.03.293.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Lu S, Fang J, Li X, Cao L, Zhou J, Guo Q, et al. Once-daily savolitinib in Chinese patients with pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinomas and other non-small-cell lung cancers harbouring MET exon 14 skipping alterations: a multicentre, single-arm, open-label, phase 2 study. Lancet Respir Med. 2021;9(10):1154–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-2600(21)00084-9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Guisier F, Dubos-Arvis C, Viñas F. Efficacy and safety of anti-PD-1 immunotherapy in patients with advanced NSCLC with BRAF, HER2, or MET mutations or RET translocation: GFPC 01-2018. J Thorac Oncol. 2020;15:628–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtho.2019.12.129.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Sabari JK, Leonardi GC, Shu CA, Umeton R, Montecalvo J, Ni A, et al. PD-L1 expression, tumor mutational burden, and response to immunotherapy in patients with MET exon 14 altered lung cancers. Ann Oncol. 2018;29(10):2085–91. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdy334.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Mazieres J, Drilon A, Lusque A, Mhanna L, Cortot AB, Mezquita L, et al. Immune checkpoint inhibitors for patients with advanced lung cancer and oncogenic driver alterations: results from the IMMUNOTARGET registry. Ann Oncol. 2019;30:1321–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Zhang Y, Yang Q, Zeng X, Wang M, Dong S, Yang B, et al. MET amplification attenuates lung tumor response to immunotherapy by inhibiting STING. Cancer Discov. 2021;11(11):2726–37. https://doi.org/10.1158/2159-8290.CD-20-1500.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Chen B, Wang J, Pu X, Li J, Wang Q, Liu L, et al. The efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors combined with chemotherapy or anti-angiogenic therapy as a second-line or later treatment option for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a retrospective comparative cohort study. Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2022;11(10):2111–24. https://doi.org/10.21037/tlcr-22-697.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Schoenfeld AJ, Rizvi H, Bandlamudi C, Sauter JL, Travis WD, Rekhtman N, et al. Clinical and molecular correlates of PD-L1 expression in patients with lung adenocarcinomas. Ann Oncol. 2020;31:599–608.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Xu C, Chen YP, Du XJ, Liu JQ, Huang CL, Chen L, et al. Comparative safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors in cancer: systematic review and network meta-analysis. BMJ. 2018;363:4226. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.k4226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Almutairi AR, McBride A, Slack M, Erstad BL, Abraham I. Potential immune-related adverse events associated with monotherapy and combination therapy of ipilimumab, nivolumab, and pembrolizumab for advanced melanoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Oncol. 2020;10:91. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.00091.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to appreciate all patients and their families for their cooperation and participation. Additionally, we are thankful to all research staff and co-investigators involved in this research.

Funding

The study was supported by the Medical Scientific Research Foundation of Zhejiang Province (No. 2022KY653), and sponsored by Zhejiang provincial program for the Cultivation of High-Level Innovative Health Talents (to Zhengbo Song).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

ZS and YH designed and supervised the research. YW, JW, MX, JX and KS conducted the follow-up, data collection, and correlative analysis. YW, MX and YH provided support in data analysis and use of software. YW, JW, MX and KS provided data analysis. YW, MX and YH were involved in manuscript preparation and all the authors approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Yue Hao or Zhengbo Song.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Approval of the study protocol was obtained from Zhejiang Cancer Hospital Institutional Review Board Committee (approval number: IRB-2022-396). Individual consent for this retrospective analysis was waived.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Consent to participate and publish

Individual consent for analysis was waived.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendices

Appendix 1

See Fig.

Fig. 4
figure 4

The swimmer’s plot showing the PFS and OS for all NSCLC patients with PD-L1 positive. a The PFS for all NSCLC patients with PD-L1 positive; b the OS for all NSCLC patients with PD-L1 positive

4.

Appendix 2

See Fig.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Kaplan–Meier estimates of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). a PFS of three type patients with MET alterations (MET exon 14 skipping vs primary amplification vs secondary amplification: 9.2 vs 7.8 vs 3.4 months, p  = 0.645); b OS of three type patients with MET alterations (MET exon 14 skipping vs primary amplification vs secondary amplification: 16.7 vs 15.1 vs 10.8 months, p  = 0.493)

5.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, Y., Wei, J., Xu, M. et al. Efficacy and safety analysis of immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer patients with MET alterations. Clin Transl Oncol (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12094-024-03455-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12094-024-03455-y

Keywords

Navigation