Skip to main content
Log in

Structure and Dynamics for Graphs of Interplanetary Magnetic Field Vectors

  • Published:
Cosmic Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper applies the methods of information theory to the study of the interplanetary magnetic field and its variations as a result of solar activity. The statistical regularities of the projections of the vectors of the interplanetary magnetic field and the speed of the flow of solar wind particles do not carry information about the order of realization for the available states of the studied physical system. At the same time, such characteristics can be obtained from phase diagrams or phase portraits created on the basis of experimental samples in subspaces of the phase space, which display both the values of vector quantities and the sequence order in a particular time series. The paper proposes a method for synthesizing vector graphs in the phase subspace of the interplanetary magnetic field (IMF). Results are considered of the reconstruction and analysis of implemented graphs based on the time series of satellite monitoring of the state of the IMF, provided by the database of the NASA Goddard Space Flight Center since the beginning of 2023. The graph is constructed on the basis of experimental samples for projections of magnetic field vectors. Field vectors converge and diverge at the nodes of the graph, the edges of the graph allow one to control the analyzed trajectory of the system in the phase subspace and restore the transition tree for a particular vector field. The concept of a spherical reference surface of a vector graph is introduced, which allows one to bring the compared implementations of graphs to a single linear scale and a single curvature of the reference surface. Examples are considered under the action of various external factors associated with the solar magnetic field and coronal mass ejections.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 7.
Fig. 8.
Fig. 9.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Birkeland, K., Are the solar corpuscular rays that penetrate the Earth’s atmosphere negative or positive rays?, I. Mat.-Naturv. Klasse. Videnskapsselskapets Skrifter, 1916, no. 1, pp. 1–27.

  2. Biermann, L.F., Solar corpuscular radiation and the interplanetary gas, in A Source Book in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 1900–1975, Harvard University Press, 1979, pp. 147–148.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Parker, E.N., Dynamics of the interplanetary gas and magnetic fields, Astrophys. J., 1958, vol. 128, p. 664. https://doi.org/10.1086/146579

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Parker, E., Dynamical theory of the solar wind, Space Sci. Rev., 1965, vol. 4, nos. 5–6, pp. 666–708.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Réville, V., Velli, M., Panasenco, O., et al., The role of Alfvén wave dynamics on the large-scale properties of the solar wind: Comparing an MHD simulation with Parker Solar Probe E1 data, Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser., 2020, vol. 246, no. 2, p. 24. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4365/ac532e

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Svirzhevsky, N., Bazilevskaya, G., Kalinin, M., et al., Heliospheric magnetic field and the parker model, Geomagn. Aeron., 2021, vol. 61, pp. 299–311. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0016793221030154

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Adhikari, L., Khabarova, O., Zank, G.P., et al., The role of magnetic reconnection-associated processes in local particle acceleration in the solar wind, Astrophys. J., 2019, vol. 873, no. 1, p. 72. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ab05c6

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Bale, S., Badman, S., Bonnell, J., et al., Highly structured slow solar wind emerging from an equatorial coronal hole, Nature, 2019, vol. 576, pp. 237–242. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1818-7

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Alberti, T., Consolini, G., Carbone, V., et al., Multifractal and chaotic properties of solar wind at MHD and kinetic domains: An empirical mode decomposition approach, Entropy, 2019, vol. 21, no. 3, p. 320. https://doi.org/10.3390/e21030320

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Prasad, P.K., Gowrisankar, A., Saha, A., et al., Dynamical properties and fractal patterns of nonlinear waves in solar wind plasma, Phys. Scr., 2020, vol. 95, no. 6, p. 065603. https://doi.org/10.1088/1402-4896/ab833c

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Godsil, C. and Royle, G.F., Algebraic graph theory, in Graduate Texts in Mathematics Series, vol. 207, Springer Science & Business Media, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kalofolias, V., How to learn a graph from smooth signals, in Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, PMLR, 2016, pp. 920–929.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Pal, M., Samanta, S., and Ghorai, G., Modern Trends in Fuzzy Graph Theory, Springer, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-8803-7

    Book  Google Scholar 

  14. Cheng, S.-W., Cheong, O., Lee, T., et al., Fitting a graph to one-dimensional data, Theor. Comput. Sci., 2021, vol. 867, pp. 40–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcs.2021.03.020

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Daitch, S.I., Kelner, J.A., and Spielman, D.A., Fitting a graph to vector data, in Proc. 26th Annual International Conference on Machine Learning, Montreal, Canada, 2009, pp. 201–208. https://doi.org/10.1145/1553374.1553400

  16. Shugay, Y., Slemzin, V., and Veselovsky, I., Magnetic field sector structure and origins of solar wind streams in 2012, J. Space Weather Space Clim., 2014, vol. 4, p. A24.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. Svec, A., Global Differential Geometry of Surfaces, Springer Science & Business Media, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Abbena, E., Salamon, S., and Gray, A., Modern Differential Geometry of Curves and Surfaces with Mathematica, CRC Press, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315276038

    Book  Google Scholar 

  19. Lovett, S., Differential Geometry of Curves and Surfaces, CRC Press, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003295341

    Book  Google Scholar 

  20. Myagkova, I., Shiroky, V., and Dolenko, S., Prediction of geomagnetic indexes with the help of artificial neural networks, E3S Web of Conferences, 2017, vol. 20, p. 02011. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20172002011

  21. Myagkova, I., Shirokii, V., Vladimirov, R., et al., Comparative efficiency of prediction of relativistic electron flux in the near-Earth space using various machine learning methods, Advances in Neural Computation, Machine Learning, and Cognitive Research IV, Springer, 2021, pp. 222–227. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60577-3_25

    Book  Google Scholar 

  22. Bogomolov, A.V., Bogomolov, V.V., Iyudin, A.F., et al., Space weather effects from observations by Moscow University cubesat constellation, Universe, 2022, vol. 8, no. 5, p. 282. https://doi.org/10.3390/universe8050282

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. Shugay, Y.S. and Kaportseva, K., Forecast of the quasi-stationary and transient solar wind streams based on solar observations in 2010, Geomagn. Aeron., 2021, vol. 61, no. 2, pp. 158–168. https://doi.org/10.1134/S001679322102016X

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. Bhowmik, P., Jiang, J., Upton, L., et al., Physical models for solar cycle predictions, Space Sci. Rev., 2023, vol. 219, no. 5, p. 40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-023-00983-x

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. Vidotto, A.A., The evolution of the solar wind, Liv. Rev. Sol. Phys., 2021, vol. 18, no. 1, p. 3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41116-021-00029-w

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Viall, N.M. and Borovsky, J.E., Nine outstanding questions of solar wind physics, J. Geophys. Res.: Space Phys., 2020, vol. 125, no. 7, p. e2018JA026005. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JA026005

  27. Sadovnikov, B., Inozemtseva, N., and Perepelkin, E., Generalized phase space and conservative systems, Dokl. Math., 2013, vol. 88, pp. 457–459. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064562413040285

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  28. Perepelkin, E., Sadovnikov, B., Inozemtseva, N., et al., Universal density matrix for the phase space, 2019. arXiv- preprint arXiv:1904.04950.

  29. Perepelkin, E., Sadovnikov, B., Inozemtseva, N., et al., Exact time-dependent solution of the Schroedinger equation, its generalization to the phase space and relation to the Gibbs distribution, Phys. Scr., 2022, vol. 98, no. 1, p. 015221. https://doi.org/10.1088/1402-4896/acab39

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  30. Perepelkin, E., Sadovnikov, B., Inozemtseva, N., et al., Dispersion chain of quantum mechanics equations, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor., 2023, vol. 56, no. 14, p. 145202.

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The work was carried out within the framework of the state orders “Research of the Sun, Monitoring and Modeling of the Radiation Environment and Plasma processes in the Heliosphere and near-Earth Space” (TsITIS no. 122071200023-6) and “Wave Beams and Pulses in Randomly Inhomogeneous and Stratified Media” (TsITIS no. 117121890022-8).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to N. A. Suhareva.

Ethics declarations

The authors of this work declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note.

Pleiades Publishing remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Antonov, J.A., Zakharov, V.I., Myagkova, I.N. et al. Structure and Dynamics for Graphs of Interplanetary Magnetic Field Vectors. Cosmic Res 62, 147–161 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0010952523600336

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0010952523600336

Navigation