Skip to main content
Log in

Parametric study of under-reamed piled ring foundation in soft clay

  • Published:
Sādhanā Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A numerical analysis of the under-reamed piled ring foundation was performed to comprehend the effect of randomly distributed fibre-reinforced sand (RDFS cushion) overlying the soft clay and the influence of providing the under-reams on the pile stem. The study has been carried out with respect to load sharing ratio, differential settlement, load improvement factor (QIF) and settlement reduction ratio (SRR). Analysis of the results indicated that for the piled ring foundation, QIF and load sharing ratio increases, and differential settlement decreases with an increase in the number of under-reams on the pile stem and a decrease in the spacing between piles. Whereas, RDFS cushion underneath the ring foundation in the under-reamed piled ring foundation further increases QIF and decreases differential settlement and changes the behaviour of the under-reamed piled ring foundation towards the circular piled ring foundation. The differential settlement was reduced more for the pile arrangement patterns that had some piles near the ring foundation’s inner edge than that of the pile arrangement patterns with piles along the centerline of the ring foundation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11
Figure 12
Figure 13
Figure 14
Figure 15
Figure 16
Figure 17
Figure 18
Figure 19
Figure 20
Figure 21
Figure 22
Figure 23
Figure 24

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

RDFSC:

Randomly distributed fibre reinforced sand cushion

QIF :

Load improvement factor

SRR :

Settlement reduction ration

PRF:

Piled ring foundation

UPRF:

Under-reamed piled ring foundation

L:

Length of pile

D:

Diameter of the pile

Du :

Diamter of the under-ream

Di :

Inner diameter of the ring foundation

Do :

Outer diameter of the ring foundation

H:

Thickness of the RDFSC

b:

Width of the ring foundation strip

d:

Depth of the first under-ream from the base of the ring foundation

Spc :

Center to the center spacing between piles provided at the ring foundation’s the centerline

Spi :

Center to the center spacing between piles provided near the ring foundation’s inner edge

Spo :

Center to the center spacing between piles provided near the ring foundation’s the outer edge

Spio :

Center to center spacing between piles provided near the ring foundation’s inner and outer edge

Spic :

Center to center spacing between piles provided near the ring foundation’s inner edge and at the center

Spoc :

Center to center spacing between piles provided near the ring foundation’s outer edge and at the center

N:

Number of piles

u:

Upheaval of soil from the opening of the ring foundation

s:

Settlement of the ring foundation/PRF/UPRF

θ:

Angle of distortion

GPRF :

Load sharing ratio

References

  1. Gray D H and Maher M H 1989 Admixture of stabilization of sand with discrete, randomly distributed fibre. In: Proceedings of 12th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Rio de Janeiro, pp. 1363–1366

  2. Bhartiya P, Chakraborty T and Basu D 2021 Load-settlement response of piled raft foundations in sand. Geomech. Geoeng. Int. J. 17: 1260–1283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. El-Garhy B M 2013 Behaviour of raft on settlement reducing piles: experimental model study. J. Rock Mech. Geotech. Eng. 5: 389–399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Horikoshi K, Matsumoto T, Hashizume Y, Watanabe T and Fukuyama H 2003 Performance of piled raft foundations subjected to static horizontal loads. Int. J. Phys. Modell. Geotech. 3: 37–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Fattah M Y, Al-Mosawi M J and Al-Zayadi A A 2013 Time dependent behavior of piled raft foundation in clayey soil. Geomech. Eng. 5: 17–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kim K N, Lee S H, Kim S K, Chung C K, Kim M M and Lee H S 2011 Optimal pile arrangement for minimizing differential settlements in piled raft foundations. Comput. Geotech. 28: 235–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Nguyen D D C, Kim D S and Jo S B 2014 Parametric study for optimal design of large piled raft foundations on sand. Comput. Geotechn. 55: 14–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Rabiei M and Choobbasti A J 2016 Piled raft design strategies for high rise buildings. Geotechn. Geol. Eng. 34: 75–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Sawant V A, Pawar S V and Ladhane K B 2012 Parametric study of piled raft for three load-patterns. Coupled Syst. Mech. 1: 115–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Small J C and Zhang H H 2002 Behavior of piled raft foundations under lateral and vertical loading. Int. J. Geomech. 1: 29–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Alnuaim A M, El Naggar M H and Naggar H 2018 Performance of micropiled rafts in clay: numerical investigation. Comput. Geotech. 99: 42–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lee J, Kim Y and Jeong S 2010 Three-dimensional analysis of bearing behavior of piled raft on soft clay. Comput. Geotech. 37: 103–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Mali S and Singh B 2018 Behavior of large piled-raft foundation on clay soil. Ocean Eng. 149: 205–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sinha A and Hanna A M 2017 3D numerical model for piled raft foundation. Int. J. Geomech. 17: 1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Poulos H G 2001 Piled raft foundations: design and applications. Géotechnique 51: 95–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ata A, Badraw E and Nabil M 2015 Numerical analysis of unconnected piled raft with cushion. Ain Shams Eng. J. 6: 421–428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Chen L Z, Liang F Y, Yan P and Shi X G 2004 Experimental study on behaviour of rigid-flexible pile raft foundation with cushion. J. Build. Struct. 25: 125–129

    Google Scholar 

  18. Liu K, Xie X, Shi S and Zhu X 2009 Numerical analysis on the performance of a cushioned foundation with a mixture of both rigid and flexible piles. In: US-China Workshop on Ground Improvement Technologies Advances in Ground Improvement. Orland, USA

  19. Zhu X J 2017 Analysis of the load sharing behaviour and cushion failure mode for a disconnected piled raft. Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2017: 1–14

    Google Scholar 

  20. Dash B K and Pise P J 2003 Effect of compressive load on uplift capacity of model piles. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 129: 987–992

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Chae D, Cho W and Na H Y 2012 Uplift capacity of belled pile in weathered sandstones. Int. J. Offshore Polar Eng. 22: 297–305

    Google Scholar 

  22. Cooke R W and Whitaker T 1961 Experiments on model piles with enlarged bases. Geotechnique. 11: 1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Gao G, Gao M, Chen Q and Yang J 2019 Field load testing study of vertical bearing behavior of a large diameter belled cast-in-place pile. KSCE J. Civ. Eng. 23: 2009–2016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kong G, Yang Q, Liu H L and Liang R Y 2013 Numerical study of a new belled wedge pile type under different loading modes. Eur. J. Environ. Civ. Eng. 17: 65–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ling Z, Wang W and Wu J 2018 Full-scale loading test on prebored precast pile with enlarged base in Shanghai. In: Proceedings of the GeoShansghai International Conference: Advances in Soil Dynamics and Foundation Engineering Springer, Singapore, pp. 637–645

  26. Majumder M and Chakraborty D 2021 Bearing and uplift capacities of under-reamed piles in soft clay underlaid by stiff clay using lower-bound finite element limit analysis. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng. 15: 537–551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Meyerhof G G and Adams J I 1968 The ultimate uplift capacity of foundations. Can. Geotech. J. 5: 225–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Nazir R, Moayedi H, Pratikso A and Mosallanezhad M 2014 The uplift load capacity of an enlarged base pier embedded in dry sand. Arab. J. Geosci. 8: 7285–7296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Peter A, Lakshmanan J N and Manoharan P D 2016 Investigations on the static behavior of self-compacting concrete under-reamed piles. J. Mater. Civ. Eng. ASCE. 18: 408–414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Shanker K, Basudhar P K and Patra N R 2007 Uplift capacity of single piles: predictions and performance. Geotech. Geol. Eng. 25: 151–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Vali R, Khotbehsara E, Saberian M, Li J, Mehrinejad M and Jahandari S 2017 A three-dimensional numerical comparison of bearing capacity and settlement of tapered and under-reamed piles. Int. J. Geotech. Eng. 2017: 1–13

    Google Scholar 

  32. Wang W D, Wu B J and Wang X J 2016 Ultimate load tests on bearing and deformation behavior of uplift piles with enlarged base. Chin. J. Geotech. Eng. 38: 1330–1337

    Google Scholar 

  33. George B E and Hari G 2016 Numerical investigations of under-reamed piles. In: Proceedings of Indian Geotechnical Conference, IIT Madras, Chennai, India

  34. Sandhu P K D S and Kumar A 2022 Experimental and numerical analysis of the under-reamed piled ring foundation. Marine Georesour. Geotechnol. 41: 339–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Singh P K D and Kumar A 2021 Experimental study on piled ring foundation resting on RDFS cushion overlying soft clay. Marine Georesour. Geotechnol. 40: 795–812

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. IS 2911 Part III 1980 Indian standard of practice for design and construction of pile foundations, part III under-reamed piles. Bureau of Indian Standard, New Delhi

  37. Gandhi S R and Maharaj D K 1996 Analysis of piled raft foundation. In: Proceedings of Sixth International Conference on Piling and Deep Foundations, Bombay, India

  38. Akbas S O, Kulhawy M and Kulhawy F H 2009 Axial compression of footings in cohesionless soils. I: load-settlement behavior. J. Geotechn. Geoenviron. Eng. 135: 1562–1574

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Cho J, Lee J H, Jeong S and Le J 2012 The settlement behavior of piled raft in clay soils. Ocean Eng. 53: 153–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Prince Karandeep Singh.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Singh, P.K., Kumar, A. Parametric study of under-reamed piled ring foundation in soft clay. Sādhanā 49, 147 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-024-02510-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-024-02510-2

Keywords

Navigation