Skip to main content
Log in

Experimental study on electrode materials characteristics for dewatering and remediation of copper-contaminated sediment from Tai Lake based on vacuum electro-osmosis

基于铜污染太湖底泥的真空电渗脱水去污电极材料特性试验研究

  • Published:
Journal of Central South University Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The vacuum electro-osmosis method enables integrated treatment of heavy metal-contaminated sediments by simultaneously removing water and pollutants. This study focuses on the dredged sediments from Tai Lake and investigates the performance of five electrode materials (electrokinetic geo-synthetics, graphite, aluminum, iron, and copper) in the vacuum electro-osmotic treatment process through a self-designed test system. Multiple aspects, including drainage volume, settlement, current, effective potential, pollutant removal efficiency, and energy consumption, were analyzed. The results indicate that using copper as an electrode material has the best dewatering effect but poorer copper pollutant removal efficiency. On the other hand, using electrokinetic geo-synthetics as an electrode material demonstrates the best copper pollutant removal efficiency, with dewatering effect second only to copper, highlighting the superiority of electrokinetic geo-synthetics material in integrated dewatering and remediation treatment. When using metal as an electrode material, the anode electrode corrosion is more severe, which significantly affects various parameters of the vacuum electro-osmotic process and the treatment outcomes. The introduction of vacuum pressure alters the conventional trend of continuous decay in effective potential during the traditional electro-osmotic process. It causes a rebound in effective potential during the later stages of treatment, and the magnitude of this rebound is influenced by the electrode material’s ability to accommodate deformation.

摘要

真空电渗法能够实现重金属污染底泥脱水去污一体化处理, 本文通过自制真空电渗一体化室内 模型试验系统, 从排水量、沉降、电流、有效电势、污染物去除率、能耗等方面, 对EKG、石墨、 铝、铁、铜等五种材料作为电极在真空电渗方法处理铜污染太湖底泥过程中的表现进行分析。结果表 明:选用铜作为电极材料具有最好的脱水效果但对铜污染去除效果较差, 而选用EKG作为电极则具有 最好的铜污染去除效果, 且脱水效果仅次于铜, 说明EKG材料在脱水去污一体化处理中的优越性。当 选用金属作为电极材料时, 阳极的电极腐蚀较为严重, 很大程度上影响处理过程中真空电渗各项参数 和处理效果。介入真空压力后, 改变了传统电动修复过程中有效电势持续衰减的趋势, 使有效电势在 处理中后期出现回升, 且回升程度受电极材料变形协调能力的影响。

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. RAJESHKUMAR S, LIU Yang, ZHANG Xiang-yang, et al. Studies on seasonal pollution of heavy metals in water, sediment, fish and oyster from the Meiliang Bay of Taihu Lake in China [J]. Chemosphere, 2018, 191: 626–638. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.10.078.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. LI Yan, ZHOU Sheng-lu, ZHU Qing, et al. One-century sedimentary record of heavy metal pollution in western Taihu Lake, China [J]. Environmental Pollution, 2018, 240: 709–716. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2018.05.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. WU Ya-jun, XU Yang, ZHANG Xu-dong, et al. Experimental study on vacuum preloading consolidation of landfill sludge conditioned by Fenton’s reagent under varying filter pore size [J]. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 2021, 49(1): 109–121. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2020.09.008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. XU Yang, WU Ya-jun, ZHANG Xu-dong, et al. Effects of freeze-thaw and chemical preconditioning on the consolidation properties and microstructure of landfill sludge [J]. Water Research, 2021, 200: 117249. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2021.117249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. MULLIGAN C N, YONG R N, GIBBS B F. An evaluation of technologies for the heavy metal remediation of dredged sediments [J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2001, 85(1–2): 145–163. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0304-3894(01)00226-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. PENG Jie, XIONG Xiong, MAHFOUZ A H, et al. Vacuum preloading combined electroosmotic strengthening of ultrasoft soil [J]. Journal of Central South University, 2013, 20(11): 3282–3295. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-013-1852-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. LIU Han-long, CUI Yun-liang, SHEN Yang, et al. A new method of combination of electroosmosis, vacuum and surcharge preloading for soft ground improvement [J]. China Ocean Engineering, 2014, 28(4): 511–528. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13344-014-0042-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. LI Xiao-bing, ZHAO Ran, FU Hong-tao, et al. Slurry improvement by vacuum preloading and electro-osmosis [J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Geotechnical Engineering, 2019, 172(2): 145–154. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1680/jgeen.17.00181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. ACAR Y B, GALE R J, ALSHAWABKEH A N, et al. Electrokinetic remediation: Basics and technology status [J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 1995, 40(2): 117–137. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3894(94)00066-p.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. WEN Dong-dong, FU Rong-bing, LI Qian. Removal of inorganic contaminants in soil by electrokinetic remediation technologies: A review [J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2021, 401: 123345. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.123345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. KIM D H, RYU B G, PARK S W, et al. Electrokinetic remediation of Zn and Ni-contaminated soil [J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2009, 165(1–3): 501–505. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.10.025.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. XU Hui-chao, ZHANG Chun-peng, ZHANG Hui, et al. Enhanced electrokinetic remediation of heterogeneous aquifer co-contaminated with Cr(VI) and nitrate by rhamnolipids [J]. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 2022, 10(5): 108531. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2022.108531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. SHANG J Q, LO K Y. Electrokinetic dewatering of a phosphate clay [J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 1997, 55(1–3): 117–133. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0304-3894(97)00018-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. SEGALL B A, BRUELL C J. Electroosmotic contaminant-removal processes [J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 1992, 118(1): 84–100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0733-9372(1992)118:1(84).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. XUE Zhi-jia, TANG Xiao-wei, YANG Qing, et al. Comparison of electro-osmosis experiments on marine sludge with different electrode materials [J]. Drying Technology, 2015, 33(8): 986–995. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07373937.2015.1011274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. MOHAMEDELHASSAN E, SHANG J Q. Effects of electrode materials and current intermittence in electroosmosis [J]. Ground Improvement, 2001, 5(1): 3–11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1680/grim.5.1.3.39435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. ZHOU Jian, TAO Yan-li, XU Chang-jie, et al. Electroosmotic strengthening of silts based on selected electrode materials [J]. Soils and Foundations, 2015, 55(5): 1171–1180. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2015.09.017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. PUGH R C. The application of electrokinetic geosynthetic materials to uses in the construction industry [D]. Newcastle University, 2002. http://theses.ncl.ac.uk/jspui/handle/10443/923.

  19. LING Jian-ming, LI Xiang, QIAN Jin-song, et al. Performance comparison of different electrode materials for electro-osmosis treatment on subgrade soil [J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2021, 271: 121590. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121590.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. XIAO Fang, GUO Kang-shi, ZHUANG Yan-feng. Study on electroosmotic consolidation of sludge using EKG [J]. International Journal of Geosynthetics and Ground Engineering, 2021, 7(2): 33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40891-021-00273-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. TAO Yan-li, ZHOU Jian, GONG Xiao-nan. Comparative experimental study on electroosmosis of iron, graphite, copper and aluminum electrodes [J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2013, 32(S2): 3355–3362.

    Google Scholar 

  22. WANG Yu-chen, HAN Zi-jian, LI Ang, et al. Enhanced electrokinetic remediation of heavy metals contaminated soil by biodegradable complexing agents [J]. Environmental Pollution, 2021, 283: 117111. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2021.117111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. TANG Jian, QIU Zhong-ping, TANG Heng-jun, et al. Coupled with EDDS and approaching anode technique enhanced electrokinetic remediation removal heavy metal from sludge [J]. Environmental Pollution, 2021, 272: 115975. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115975.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

The overarching research goals were developed by LI Shao-yu and SHEN Yang. The experiment was carried out by LI Shao-yu, QI Wencheng and CHEN Kai-jia. LI Shao-yu and QI Wencheng calculated the experimental data. LI Shao-yu and SHEN Yang analyzed the experimental data. The initial draft of the manuscript was written by LI Shao-yu, SHEN Yang, QI Wen-cheng, and CHEN Kai-jia. All authors replied to reviewers’ comments and revised the final version.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yang Shen  (沈扬).

Ethics declarations

LI Shao-yu, SHEN Yang, QI Wen-cheng and CHEN Kai-jia declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Foundation item: Project(52278343) supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, Sy., Shen, Y., Qi, Wc. et al. Experimental study on electrode materials characteristics for dewatering and remediation of copper-contaminated sediment from Tai Lake based on vacuum electro-osmosis. J. Cent. South Univ. 31, 827–840 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-024-5589-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-024-5589-4

Key words

关键词

Navigation