Abstract
The phenomenon of two-dimensional localization of the upper hybrid (UH) wave in a magnetic island was discovered. It was studied how this phenomenon affects the threshold and saturation level of the absolute parametric decay instability of the extraordinary wave, as a result of which a couple of two-dimensionally localized UH waves are excited.
REFERENCES
R. Z. Sagdeev and A. A. Galeev, Nonlinear Plasma Theory, Ed. by T. M. O’Neil and D. L. Book (Benjamin, New York, 1969).
R. C. Davidson, Methods in Nonlinear Plasma Theory (Academic, New York, 1972).
A. Hasegawa, Plasma Instabilities and Nonlinear Effects (Springer, New York, 1975).
V. P. Silin, Sov. Phys. JETP 20, 1510 (1965).
L. M. Gorbunov and V. P. Silin, Sov. Phys. JETP 22, 1347 (1966).
E. A. Jackson, Phys. Rev. 153, 235 (1967).
A. Bers, D. J. Kaup, and A. Reiman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 37, 182 (1976).
D. J. Kaup, A. Reiman, and A. Bers, Rev. Mod. Phys. 51, 275 (1979).
V. P. Silin, Sov. Phys. JETP 24, 1242 (1967).
W. Horton, Rev. Mod. Phys. 71, 735 (1999).
A. D. Piliya, in Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Phenomena in Ionized Gases, Oxford, 1971, p. 320.
A. D. Piliya, Sov. Phys. JETP 37, 629 (1973).
M. N. Rosenbluth, Phys. Rev. Lett. 29, 565 (1972).
A. Reiman, Rev. Mod. Phys. 51, 331 (1979).
A. Bers, in Basic Plasma Physics II (Handbook of Plasma Physics), Ed. by A. A. Galeev and R. N. Sudan (Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, 1984).
E. Z. Gusakov and V. I. Fedorov, Sov. J. Plasma Phys. 5, 463 (1979).
A. Yu. Popov and E. Z. Gusakov, Plasma Phys. Controlled Fusion 57, 025022 (2015).
A. Yu. Popov and E. Z. Gusakov, Europhys. Lett. 116, 45002 (2016).
A. Yu. Popov and E. Z. Gusakov, JETP Lett. 105, 78 (2017).
E. Z. Gusakov and A. Yu. Popov, Phys.—Usp. 63, 365 (2020).
S. K. Hansen, S. K. Nielsen, J. Stober, J. Rasmussen, M. Stejner, M. Hoelzl, T. Jensen, and the ASDEX Upgrade team, Nucl. Fusion 60, 106008 (2020).
S. K. Hansen, A. S. Jacobsen, M. Willensdorfer, S. K. Nielsen, J. Stober, K. Höfler, M. Maraschek, R. Fischer, M. Dunne, the EUROfusion MST1 team, and the USDEX Upgrade team, Plasma Phys. Controlled Fusion 63, 095002 (2021).
A. Tancetti, S. K. Nielsen, J. Rasmussen, E. Z. Gusakov, A. Y. Popov, D. Moseev, T. Stange, M. G. Senstius, C. Killer, M. Vecséi, T. Jensen, M. Zanini, I. Abramovic, M. Stejner, G. Anda, et al., Nucl. Fusion 62, 074003 (2022).
A. Tancetti, S. K. Nielsen, J. Rasmussen, D. Moseev, T. Stange, S. Marsen, M. Vecséi, C. Killer, G. A. Wurden, T. Jensen, M. Stejner, G. Anda, D. Dunai, S. Zoletnik, K. Rahbarnia, et al., Plasma Phys. Controlled Fusion 65, 015001 (2023).
E. Z. Gusakov and A. Yu. Popov, Phys. Plasmas 23, 082503 (2016).
E. Z. Gusakov and A. Yu. Popov, Plasma Phys. Rep. 49, 194 (2023).
E. Z. Gusakov and A. Yu. Popov, Plasma Phys. Rep. 49, 936 (2023).
E. Westerhof, S. K. Nielsen, J. W. Oosterbeek, M. Salewski, M. R. de Baar, W. A. Bongers, A. Bürger, B. A. Hennen, S. B. Korsholm, F. Leipold, D. Moseev, M. Stejner, and D. J. Thoen (the TEXTOR Team), Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 125001 (2009).
S. K. Nielsen, M. Salewski, E. Westerhof, W. Bongers, S. B. Korsholm, F. Leipold, J. W. Oosterbeek, D. Moseev, M. Stejner, and the TEXTOR Team, Plasma Phys. Controlled Fusion 55, 115003 (2013).
E. Z. Gusakov, A. Yu. Popov, and P. V. Tretinnikov, Nucl. Fusion 59, 106040 (2019).
E. Z. Gusakov and A. Yu. Popov, Plasma Phys. Controlled Fusion 62, 025028 (2020).
E. Z. Gusakov and A. Yu. Popov, Nucl. Fusion 60, 076018 (2020).
A. B. Altukhov, V. I. Arkhipenko, A. D. Gurchenko, E. Z. Gusakov, A. Yu. Popov, L. V. Simonchik, and M. S. Usachonak, Europhys. Lett. 126, 15002 (2019).
A. I. Meshcheryakov, I. Yu. Vafin, and I. A. Grishina, Plasma Phys. Rep. 46, 1144 (2021).
Yu. N. Dnestrovskij, A. V. Danilov, A. Yu. Dnestrovskij, S. E. Lysenko, A. V. Melnikov, A. R. Nemets, M. R. Nurgaliev, G. F. Subbotin, N. A. Solovev, D. Yu. Sychugov, and S. V. Cherkasov, Plasma Phys. Controlled Fusion 63, 055012 (2021).
S. S. Abdullaev, K. H. Finken, M. W. Jakubowski, S. V. Kasilov, M. Kobayashi, D. Reiser, D. Reiter, A. M. Runov, and R. Wolf, Nucl. Fusion 43, 299 (2003).
H. R. Koslowski, E. Westerhof, M. de Bock, I. Classen, R. Jaspers, Y. Kikuchi, A. Krämer-Flecken, A. Lazaros, Y. Liang, K. Löwenbrück, S. Varshney, M. von Hellermann, R. Wolf, O. Zimmermann, and the TEXTOR team, Plasma Phys. Controlled Fusion 48, B53 (2006).
G. Bateman, MHD Instabilities (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1978).
M. Yu. Kantor, A. J. H. Donné, R. Jaspers, H. van der Meiden, and TEXTOR Team, Plasma Phys. Controlled Fusion 51, 055002 (2009).
M. Y. Kantor, G. Bertschinger, P. Bohm, A. Buerger, A. J. H. Donné, R. Jaspers, A. Krämer-Flecken, S. Mann, S. Soldatov, and Q. Zang, in Proceedings of the 36th EPS Conference on Plasma Physics, Sofia, 2009, ECA 33E, P-1.184 (2009).
A. I. Akhiezer, I. A. Akhiezer, R. V. Polovin, A. G. Sitenko, and K. N. Stepanov, Plasma Electrodynamics (Nauka, Moscow, 1974; Pergamon, Oxford, 1975).
E. Z. Gusakov, A. Yu. Popov, and A. N. Saveliev, Plasma Phys. Controlled Fusion 56, 015010 (2014).
V. V. Pustovalov and V. P. Silin, Theory of Plasmas, Ed. by D. V. Skobeltsyn, The Lebedev Physics Institute Series, Vol. 61 (Consultants Bureau, New York, 1975).
J. Larsson, J. Plasma Phys. 40, 385 (1988).
E. Z. Gusakov, A. Yu. Popov, and P. V. Tretinnikov, Plasma Phys. Controlled Fusion 61, 085008 (2019).
B. I. Cohen, R. H. Cohen, W. McCay Nevins, and T. D. Rognlien, Rev. Mod. Phys. 63, 949 (1991).
E. Z. Gusakov and A. Yu. Popov, JETP Lett. 116, 36 (2022).
V. I. Petviashvili, JETP Lett. 23, 627 (1976).
A. K. Nekrasov, Sov. J. Plasma Phys. 12, 557 (1986).
Funding
Analytical research was supported by the Russian Science Foundation (project no. 22-12-00010); numerical simulations were supported by Ioffe Institute under the State Contract no. 0040-2019-0023, and the development of the computer code for simulating the PDI saturation was supported by Ioffe Institute under the State Contract no. 0034-2021-0003.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
The authors of this work declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Additional information
Translated by I. Grishina
Publisher’s Note.
Pleiades Publishing remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
APPENDIX
APPENDIX
The set of equations describing the decay of the primary UH wave, \({{\varphi }_{n}} \propto \exp \left( { - i{{\omega }_{n}}t} \right)\), into the secondary IB wave, \({{\varphi }_{{{\text{IB}}}}} \propto \exp \left( { - i\left( {{{\omega }_{l}} - {{\omega }_{n}}} \right)t} \right)\), and the secondary UH wave, \({{\varphi }_{l}} \propto \exp \left( {i{{\omega }_{l}}t} \right)\), is as follows:
In weakly inhomogeneous plasma, the \({{\hat {D}}_{{{\text{UH,IB}}}}}\) ope-rators in the left-hand side of Eqs. (A1), acting on arbitrary function F, can be represented in the follo-wing form: \({{\hat {D}}_{{{\text{UH,IB}}}}}F\) = \(\frac{1}{{{{{(2\pi )}}^{3}}}}\int_{ - \infty }^\infty {F\left( {{\mathbf{r}}{\kern 1pt} '} \right)} \) × \(\left( {\int_{ - \infty }^\infty {{{D}_{{{\text{UH,IB}}}}}\left( {{\mathbf{q}},\frac{{{\mathbf{r}} + {\mathbf{r}}{\kern 1pt} '}}{2}} \right)\exp \left( {i{\mathbf{q}}({\mathbf{r}} - {\mathbf{r}}{\kern 1pt} ')} \right)d{\mathbf{q}}} } \right)d{\mathbf{r}}{\kern 1pt} '\), where the kernel of integral operator \({{D}_{{{\text{UH}}}}} = 0\) is determined by Eq. (3), \({{D}_{{{\text{IB}}}}} = {{q}^{2}} + \chi = 0\) is the dispersion equation of the IB wave,
is the linear plasma susceptibility, and \(Z\left( \xi \right)\) = \(2\exp \left( { - {{\xi }^{2}}} \right)\int_0^\xi {\exp \left( {{{t}^{2}}} \right)dt} \) – \(i\sqrt \pi \exp \left( { - {{\xi }^{2}}} \right)\) is the plasma dispersion function. The operators in the right-hand side of Eqs. (A1), acting on the product of two functions U and V, have the following form:
In homogeneous plasma, \(\hat {\chi }_{e}^{{nl}}\) is the second-order nonlinear susceptibility of plasma [43–45]. Let us analyze Eqs. (A1) using the approach of perturbation theory. In the first stage of perturbation procedure, we neglect the nonlinear coupling of the waves. In this case, the unperturbed solutions corresponding to the two-dimensionally localized UH waves can be determined in the same way, as in Eq. (10). The potential of the IB wave propagating mainly along the direction of plasma inhomogeneity has the following form:
where the envelope amplitude obeys the following reduced equation:
In Eq. (A3), we omit the terms describing the negligible effect of IB wave diffraction in the \(\zeta \times \xi \) plane. After integrating Eq. (A3), we obtain
We substitute formula (A4) into the right-hand sides of the first two equations in set of Eqs. (A1) and multiply these equations by \(\phi _{{{{n}_{1}}}}^{*}\left( x \right) \cdot \phi _{{{{n}_{2}}}}^{*}\left( \zeta \right)\) and \(\phi _{{{{l}_{1}}}}^{*}\left( x \right) \cdot \phi _{{{{l}_{2}}}}^{*}\left( \zeta \right)\), respectively. Then we perform integration with respect to \(x\) and \(\zeta \) that results in the following equations:
where \({{u}_{{n,l}}} = \left\langle {{{{\left| {\partial {{D}_{{{\text{UH}}}}}\left( x \right){\text{/}}\partial {{q}_{\xi }}} \right|}}_{{{{\omega }_{{n,l}}}}}}} \right\rangle {\text{/}}\left\langle {{{{\left| {\partial {{D}_{{{\text{UH}}}}}\left( x \right){\text{/}}\partial \omega } \right|}}_{{{{\omega }_{{n,l}}}}}}} \right\rangle \) are the group velocities of UH waves acquired due to the finite value of the parallel wave number, and
is the coefficient describing the secondary instability. The procedure for averaging the W arbitrary function over the modes localization region is defined as follows:
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Popov, A.Y., Gusakov, E.Z. & Teplova, N.V. Effect of Two-Dimensional Plasma Inhomogeneity in Magnetic Island on Threshold of Parametric Excitation of Trapped Upper Hybrid Waves and Level of Anomalous Absorption in ECRH Experiments. Plasma Phys. Rep. 50, 35–46 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063780X23601608
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063780X23601608