Abstract
Background
Osteoporosis (OP) is characterized by bone mass decrease and bone tissue microarchitectural deterioration in bone tissue. This study identified potential biomarkers for early diagnosis of OP and elucidated the mechanism of OP.
Methods
Gene expression profiles were downloaded from Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) for the GSE56814 dataset. A gene co-expression network was constructed using weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) to identify key modules associated with healthy and OP samples. Functional enrichment analysis was conducted using the R clusterProfiler package for modules to construct the transcriptional regulatory factor networks. We used the “ggpubr” package in R to screen for differentially expressed genes between the two samples. Gene set variation analysis (GSVA) was employed to further validate hub gene expression levels between normal and OP samples using RT-PCR and immunofluorescence to evaluate the potential biological changes in various samples.
Results
There was a distinction between the normal and OP conditions based on the preserved significant module. A total of 100 genes with the highest MM scores were considered key genes. Functional enrichment analysis suggested that the top 10 biological processes, cellular component and molecular functions were enriched. The Toll-like receptor signaling pathway, TNF signaling pathway, PI3K-Akt signaling pathway, osteoclast differentiation, JAK-STAT signaling pathway, and chemokine signaling pathway were identified by Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes pathway analysis. SIRT1 and ZNF350 were identified by Wilcoxon algorithm as hub differentially expressed transcriptional regulatory factors that promote OP progression by affecting oxidative phosphorylation, apoptosis, PI3K-Akt-mTOR signaling, and p53 pathway. According to RT-PCR and immunostaining results, SIRT1 and ZNF350 levels were significantly higher in OP samples than in normal samples.
Conclusion
SIRT1 and ZNF350 are important transcriptional regulatory factors for the pathogenesis of OP and may be novel biomarkers for OP treatment.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
All the raw data used in this study are available in the public GEO database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/). All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article. The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Abbreviations
- BP:
-
Biological processes
- CC:
-
Cellular components
- FC:
-
Fold change
- FGF23:
-
Fibroblast growth factor 23
- GEO:
-
Gene Expression Omnibus
- Gly:
-
Glycyrrhizic acid
- GO:
-
Gene Ontology
- GSVA:
-
Gene set variation analysis
- IL-6:
-
Interleukin 6
- KEGG:
-
Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes
- ME:
-
Module eigengene
- MF:
-
Molecular function
- MM:
-
Modular association
- OP:
-
Osteoporosis
- RANK:
-
Receptor activator of nuclear factor (NF)-κB
- RT-qPCR:
-
Reverse-transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction
- SIRT1:
-
Silent mating type information regulation 2 homolog- 1
- TNFR:
-
Tumor necrosis factor receptor
- TOM:
-
Topological overlap matrix
- WGCNA:
-
Weighted gene co-expression network analysis
- ZNF350:
-
Zinc-finger 350
References
Srivastava M, Deal C (2002) Osteoporosis in elderly: prevention and treatment. Clin Geriatr Med 18:529–555. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0749-0690(02)00022-8
Link TM, Majumdar S (2003) Osteoporosis imaging. Radiol Clin North Am 41:813–839. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0033-8389(03)00059-9
Straka M, Straka-Trapezanlidis M, Deglovic J, Varga I (2015) Periodontitis and osteoporosis. Neuro Endocrinol Lett 36:401–406
Bijelic R, Milicevic S, Balaban J (2017) Risk factors for osteoporosis in Postmenopausal Women. Med Arch 71:25–28. https://doi.org/10.5455/medarh.2017.71.25-28
Feng Y, Wan P, Yin L, Lou X (2020) The inhibition of MicroRNA-139-5p promoted osteoporosis of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells by targeting Wnt/Beta-Catenin signaling pathway by NOTCH1. J Microbiol Biotechnol 30:448–458. https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.1908.08036
Wang CG, Hu YH, Su SL, Zhong D (2020) LncRNA DANCR and miR-320a suppressed osteogenic differentiation in osteoporosis by directly inhibiting the Wnt/beta-catenin signaling pathway. Exp Mol Med 52:1310–1325. https://doi.org/10.1038/s12276-020-0475-0
Xu L, Zhang L, Zhang H et al (2018) The participation of fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF23) in the progression of osteoporosis via JAK/STAT pathway. J Cell Biochem 119:3819–3828. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcb.26332
Damerau A, Gaber T, Ohrndorf S, Hoff P (2020) JAK/STAT activation: a general mechanism for Bone Development, Homeostasis, and regeneration. Int J Mol Sci 21. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21239004
Wang XL, Liu YM, Zhang ZD et al (2020) Utilizing benchmarked dataset and gene regulatory network to investigate hub genes in postmenopausal osteoporosis. J Cancer Res Ther 16:867–873. https://doi.org/10.4103/0973-1482.204842
Yang Z, Zi Q, Xu K et al (2021) Development of a macrophages-related 4-gene signature and nomogram for the overall survival prediction of hepatocellular carcinoma based on WGCNA and LASSO algorithm. Int Immunopharmacol 90:107238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intimp.2020.107238
Tian Z, He W, Tang J et al (2020) Identification of important modules and biomarkers in breast Cancer based on WGCNA. Onco Targets Ther 13:6805–6817. https://doi.org/10.2147/OTT.S258439
Feng T, Li K, Zheng P et al (2019) Weighted Gene Coexpression Network Analysis Identified MicroRNA Coexpression Modules and Related Pathways in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Oxid Med Cell Longev 2019:9567641. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/9567641
Rangaraju S, Dammer EB, Raza SA et al (2018) Identification and therapeutic modulation of a pro-inflammatory subset of disease-associated-microglia in Alzheimer’s disease. Mol Neurodegener 13:24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13024-018-0254-8
Tang Y, Ke ZP, Peng YG, Cai PT (2018) Co-expression analysis reveals key gene modules and pathway of human coronary heart disease. J Cell Biochem 119:2102–2109. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcb.26372
Xia B, Li Y, Zhou J et al (2017) Identification of potential pathogenic genes associated with osteoporosis. Bone Joint Res 6:640–648. https://doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.612.BJR-2017-0102.R1
Langfelder P, Horvath S (2008) WGCNA: an R package for weighted correlation network analysis. BMC Bioinformatics 9:559. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-9-559
Zhou RH, Chen C, Jin SH et al (2020) Co-expression gene modules involved in cisplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy according to sensitivity, status, and severity. J Peripher Nerv Syst 25:366–376. https://doi.org/10.1111/jns.12407
Han H, Shim H, Shin D et al (2015) TRRUST: a reference database of human transcriptional regulatory interactions. Sci Rep 5:11432. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep11432
Han H, Cho JW, Lee S et al (2018) TRRUST v2: an expanded reference database of human and mouse transcriptional regulatory interactions. Nucleic Acids Res 46:D380–D386. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkx1013
Yu G, Wang LG, Han Y, He QY (2012) clusterProfiler: an R package for comparing biological themes among gene clusters. OMICS 16:284–287. https://doi.org/10.1089/omi.2011.0118
Hänzelmann S, Castelo R, Guinney J (2013) GSVA: gene set variation analysis for microarray and RNA-seq data. BMC Bioinformatics 14:7. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-14-7
Wang Z, Wang D, Liu Y et al (2021) Mesenchymal stem cell in mice uterine and its therapeutic effect on osteoporosis. Rejuvenation Res 24:139–150. https://doi.org/10.1089/rej.2019.2262
Miller PD (2016) Management of severe osteoporosis. Expert Opin Pharmacother 17:473–488. https://doi.org/10.1517/14656566.2016.1124856
Kaliman P, Vinals F, Testar X et al (1996) Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase inhibitors block differentiation of skeletal muscle cells. J Biol Chem 271:19146–19151. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.271.32.19146
Sakaue H, Ogawa W, Matsumoto M et al (1998) Posttranscriptional control of adipocyte differentiation through activation of phosphoinositide 3-kinase. J Biol Chem 273:28945–28952. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.273.44.28945
Ghosh-Choudhury N, Abboud SL, Nishimura R et al (2002) Requirement of BMP-2-induced phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase and akt serine/threonine kinase in osteoblast differentiation and smad-dependent BMP-2 gene transcription. J Biol Chem 277:33361–33368. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M205053200
Xi JC, Zang HY, Guo LX et al (2015) The PI3K/AKT cell signaling pathway is involved in regulation of osteoporosis. J Recept Signal Transduct Res 35:640–645. https://doi.org/10.3109/10799893.2015.1041647
Asagiri M, Takayanagi H (2007) The molecular understanding of osteoclast differentiation. Bone 40:251–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2006.09.023
Cao B, Dai X, Wang W (2019) Knockdown of TRPV4 suppresses osteoclast differentiation and osteoporosis by inhibiting autophagy through ca(2+) -calcineurin-NFATc1 pathway. J Cell Physiol 234:6831–6841. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcp.27432
Yin Z, Zhu W, Wu Q et al (2019) Glycyrrhizic acid suppresses osteoclast differentiation and postmenopausal osteoporosis by modulating the NF-kappaB, ERK, and JNK signaling pathways. Eur J Pharmacol 859:172550. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejphar.2019.172550
Zi Z, Cho KH, Sung MH et al (2005) In silico identification of the key components and steps in IFN-gamma induced JAK-STAT signaling pathway. FEBS Lett 579:1101–1108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.febslet.2005.01.009
Carafa V, Nebbioso A, Altucci L (2012) Sirtuins and disease: the road ahead. Front Pharmacol 3:4. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2012.00004
Godfrin-Valnet M, Khan KA, Guillot X et al (2014) Sirtuin 1 activity in peripheral blood mononuclear cells of patients with osteoporosis. Med Sci Monit Basic Res 20:142–145. https://doi.org/10.12659/MSMBR.891372
Simic P, Zainabadi K, Bell E et al (2013) SIRT1 regulates differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells by deacetylating beta-catenin. EMBO Mol Med 5:430–440. https://doi.org/10.1002/emmm.201201606
Edwards JR, Perrien DS, Fleming N et al (2013) Silent information regulator (Sir)T1 inhibits NF-kappaB signaling to maintain normal skeletal remodeling. J Bone Min Res 28:960–969. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.1824
Mercken EM, Mitchell SJ, Martin-Montalvo A et al (2014) SRT2104 extends survival of male mice on a standard diet and preserves bone and muscle mass. Aging Cell 13:787–796. https://doi.org/10.1111/acel.12220
Louvet L, Leterme D, Delplace S et al (2020) Sirtuin 1 deficiency decreases bone mass and increases bone marrow adiposity in a mouse model of chronic energy deficiency. Bone 136:115361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2020.115361
Ke L, Li Q, Song J et al (2021) The mitochondrial biogenesis signaling pathway is a potential therapeutic target for myasthenia gravis via energy metabolism (review). Exp Ther Med 22:702. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2021.10134
Lu C, Zhao H, Liu Y et al (2023) Novel role of the SIRT1 in endocrine and metabolic diseases. Int J Biol Sci 19:484–501. https://doi.org/10.7150/ijbs.78654
Toorie AM, Cyr NE, Steger JS et al (2016) The nutrient and energy sensor Sirt1 regulates the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) Axis by altering the production of the Prohormone Convertase 2 (PC2) essential in the maturation of corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) from its prohormone in male rats. J Biol Chem 291:5844–5859. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M115.675264
Wang X, Chen L, Peng W (2017) Protective effects of resveratrol on osteoporosis via activation of the SIRT1-NF-κB signaling pathway in rats. Exp Ther Med 14:5032–5038. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2017.5147
Tozzi R, Cipriani F, Masi D et al (2022) Ketone bodies and SIRT1, Synergic Epigenetic Regulators for Metabolic Health: a narrative review. Nutrients 14:3145. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14153145
Nakagawa T, Guarente L (2011) Sirtuins at a glance. J Cell Sci 124:833–838. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.081067
Cohen-Kfir E, Artsi H, Levin A et al (2011) Sirt1 is a regulator of bone mass and a repressor of Sost encoding for sclerostin, a bone formation inhibitor. Endocrinology 152:4514–4524. https://doi.org/2020071613282569900
Garcia V, Dominguez G, Garcia JM et al (2004) Altered expression of the ZBRK1 gene in human breast carcinomas. J Pathol 202:224–232. https://doi.org/10.1002/path.1513
Garcia V, Garcia JM, Pena C et al (2005) The GADD45, ZBRK1 and BRCA1 pathway: quantitative analysis of mRNA expression in colon carcinomas. J Pathol 206:92–99. https://doi.org/10.1002/path.1751
Lin LF, Chuang CH, Li CF et al (2010) ZBRK1 acts as a metastatic suppressor by directly regulating MMP9 in cervical cancer. Cancer Res 70:192–201. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-2641
Patnaik S, George SP, Pham E et al (2016) By moonlighting in the nucleus, villin regulates epithelial plasticity. Mol Biol Cell 27:535–548. https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E15-06-0453
Zhang Y, Zhang J, Feng D et al (2022) IRF1/ZNF350/GPX4-mediated ferroptosis of renal tubular epithelial cells promote chronic renal allograft interstitial fibrosis. Free Radic Biol Med 193:579–594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2022.11.002
Lin Y, Gong H, Liu J et al (2023) HECW1 induces NCOA4-regulated ferroptosis in glioma through the ubiquitination and degradation of ZNF350. Cell Death Dis 14:794. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41419-023-06322-w
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Editage (www.editage.com) for English language editing.
Funding
This work was supported by the Medical Science Research Project Program of Hebei Provincial Health Commission (No. 20210121) ;Hebei Natural Science Foundation (H2022406038). National Natural Science Foundation of China (82305055).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
[Xu, Wei] and [Liguo, Zhu] contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by [Jingyi, Hou], [Jingyuan, Si], [Bin Chen]. The experimental validation was performed by [Ning, Yang]. The first draft of the manuscript was written by [Naiqiang, Zhu] and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
Three osteoporotic bone tissues were obtained from patients with osteoporotic fracture surgery. Three normal bone tissues were obtained from patients with traumatic amputation. This study was performed in line with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Approval was granted by the Ethics Committee of The Affiliated Hospital of Chengde Medical University (2022.06.16/ No. CYFYLL2020240).
Consent to participate
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Consent to publish
The authors affirm that human research participants provided informed consent for publication of the images in this article.
Conflicts of interest
This study does not increase the medical costs and suffering of the subjects, and research materials and research results are used for scientific purposes without a conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Supplementary Fig. 1
. Clustering dendrogram of samples based on their Euclidean distance. (A) OP samples; (B) normal samples
Supplementary Fig. 2
. The optimal soft threshold power of the WGCNA was determined by calculating the scale-free topological fit index and the average connectivity. (A) OP samples; (B) normal samples
Supplementary table 1
. The detailed information of patients with OP and normal samples
Supplementary table 2
. Prime sequences for the hub genes
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Zhu, N., Hou, J., Si, J. et al. SIRT1 and ZNF350 as novel biomarkers for osteoporosis: a bioinformatics analysis and experimental validation. Mol Biol Rep 51, 530 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-024-09406-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-024-09406-8