Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluating landslide susceptibility: an AHP method-based approach enhanced with optimized random forest modeling

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Natural Hazards Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Understanding the extent of landslide damage is important for reducing the impact of landslides, which can cause great losses of life and property. Although numerous studies have been done on landslide disaster susceptibility, they have been limited by an unreasonable negative sample selection strategy or the absence of subjective environmental information of the study area in a single machine learning evaluation model. To evaluate landslide susceptibility based on sample optimization, we propose an analytic hierarchy process (AHP) method weighted by an improved random forest (RF) model. Based on the density analysis of landslide data, this method employs the certainty factor (CF) method to generate negative sample data. Correspondingly, ADB_RF, an enhanced RF model based on adaptive boosting (AdaBoost) is proposed to obtain objective weights, which are then combined with subjective weights obtained by the AHP (CF-combination). Additionally, a case study on the evaluation of landslide disasters was conducted in the Chuxiong Autonomous Prefecture of Yunnan, China. The results show the following: (1) the proposed landslide susceptibility evaluation method could objectively reflect the area prone to landslides with a high degree of accuracy and efficacy. (2) The area under the curve (AUC) of the CF-combination model reached 96.1%, indicating a high degree of accuracy. (3) In the northwestern region of Chuxiong Prefecture, more extremely high-risk areas were found than in the southeast; therefore, it has a high likelihood of experiencing another landslide disaster, which requires special attention. Accordingly, the research findings have significant reference value for preventing disasters and mitigating losses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments and recommendations for this manuscript. We are also grateful to LetPub for the English revision of this manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Beijing Key Laboratory of Urban Spatial Information Engineering (NO. 20230101) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 41871367).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection, and analysis were performed by HX, XZ, and ZX. The first draft of the manuscript was written by HX, XZ, ZL, and BC, and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Haoyun Xie.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, X., Xie, H., Xu, Z. et al. Evaluating landslide susceptibility: an AHP method-based approach enhanced with optimized random forest modeling. Nat Hazards (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-023-06306-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-023-06306-1

Keywords

Navigation