This study aims to answer the question, does ICAO’s mitigation policy on climate change based on international agreements reflect global environmental justice? This study adopts a qualitative research design through the process of descriptive analysis. International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) mitigation policies on climate change are one of ICAO’s efforts in achieving global environmental justice. The slogan “No Country Left Behind” is an ICAO initiative to ensure better implementation of SARPs can be harmonized globally so that all countries gain access to socioeconomic benefits resulting from safe and reliable air transportation. However, there is skepticism about ICAO global governance because, throughout the years, the policies introduced by ICAO are considered to be unsuccessful in carrying out The Kyoto Protocol’s mandates. Therefore, it is important to investigate whether the ICAO policy already reflects global environmental justice since its dimensions play an important role in global governance effectiveness. Data were collected by performing literature analysis and interviewing: (1) The ICAO Headquarters representative in Montreal via email; (2) The Indonesian government officer responsible for ICAO environmental policy; and (3) An expert on air and space law. The data were analyzed using the environmental justice dimensions of David Schlosberg, namely the distribution of environmental risks, recognition, and participation. The result shows that ICAO’s mitigation policy on climate change still needs to be improved because it does not fully reflect environmental justice dimensions. The limited features and scope of the CORSIA scheme, the unequal aviation technology advancements, and the supply of sustainable aviation fuels are the three major problems identified when it comes to the related dimensions of environmental risk distribution. The representation of ICAO-CAEP (Committee on Aviation Environmental Protection) membership does not reflect the dimensions of recognition and participation because are more favorable toward developed countries. ICAO was also criticized because the policy-making process and negotiation are more subservient to the interest of the industry.

本研究旨在回答这样一个问题：国际民航组织基于国际协议的气候变化减缓政策是否体现了全球环境正义？本研究采用描述性分析过程的定性研究设计。国际民用航空组织（ICAO）气候变化减缓政策是ICAO为实现全球环境正义所做的努力之一。“不让任何国家掉队”的口号是国际民航组织的一项举措，旨在确保在全球范围内更好地协调标准和建议措施的实施，以便所有国家都能获得安全可靠的航空运输带来的社会经济效益。然而，人们对国际民航组织的全球治理持怀疑态度，因为多年来国际民航组织推出的政策被认为在执行《京都议定书》的任务方面并不成功。因此，调查国际民航组织的政策是否已经体现了全球环境正义非常重要，因为其维度在全球治理有效性中发挥着重要作用。通过文献分析和访谈收集数据： (1) 国际民航组织蒙特利尔总部代表通过电子邮件；(2) 负责国际民航组织环境政策的印度尼西亚政府官员；(三)航空航天法专家。使用 David Schlosberg 的环境正义维度对数据进行分析，即环境风险的分布、认可度和参与度。结果表明，国际民航组织的气候变化减缓政策仍需完善，因为它没有充分体现环境正义维度。CORSIA计划的功能和范围有限、航空技术进步不平等以及可持续航空燃料供应是环境风险分配相关维度的三大问题。ICAO-CAEP（航空环境保护委员会）成员的代表性并不能体现认可和参与的维度，因为它更倾向于发达国家。国际民航组织也受到批评，因为其政策制定过程和谈判更加服从于行业利益。