This study aimed to investigate the relationships between symptoms of study addiction and their relationships with dimensions of study engagement. We used two samples in which study addiction was measured with the Bergen Study Addiction Scale and study engagement was measured with the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale for Students. The samples comprised Norwegian (n = 1107) and Polish (n = 776) students. The networks featured three clusters of nodes (two clusters of the study addiction symptoms and one cluster of the study engagement dimensions). Study addiction clusters were connected with study engagement cluster through positive edges between absorption and study addiction symptoms, negative edges which vigor shared with conflict and problems, and negative edge between dedication and mood modification. Among the symptoms of study addiction, problems, conflict, and withdrawal were the most central and salience, tolerance, and mood modification were the least central. Moreover, conflict was the most predictable and relapse was the least predictable symptom of study addiction. The results from the present study are similar to those of previous studies on work addiction and support the notion that study addiction may be a precursor to work addiction. Although based on cross-sectional data, the nuanced differences between work addiction and study addiction networks are discussed as they lay a foundation for further investigation of the potential differences in transition mechanisms from healthy engagement to compulsive behavior.

本研究旨在调查学习成瘾症状之间的关系及其与学习参与维度的关系。我们使用了两个样本，其中学习成瘾是用卑尔根学习成瘾量表测量的，学习参与度是用乌得勒支学生工作投入量表测量的。样本包括挪威 ( n = 1107) 和波兰 ( n = 776) 学生。该网络具有三簇节点（两簇学习成瘾症状和一簇研究参与维度）。学习成瘾集群与学习参与集群通过吸收和学习成瘾症状之间的正向边缘、活力与冲突和问题共享的负向边缘以及奉献和情绪调节之间的负向连接。在学习成瘾的症状中，问题、冲突和退缩是最重要的，而显着性、宽容和情绪调节是最不重要的。此外，冲突是最可预测的，而复发是最不可预测的学习成瘾症状。本研究的结果与之前关于工作成瘾的研究结果相似，并支持学习成瘾可能是工作成瘾的先兆的观点。尽管基于横截面数据，但仍讨论了工作成瘾和学习成瘾网络之间的细微差别，因为它们为进一步研究从健康参与到强迫行为的过渡机制的潜在差异奠定了基础。